Literature DB >> 25225383

Ecological and evolutionary significance of genomic GC content diversity in monocots.

Petr Šmarda1, Petr Bureš2, Lucie Horová2, Ilia J Leitch3, Ladislav Mucina4, Ettore Pacini5, Lubomír Tichý2, Vít Grulich2, Olga Rotreklová2.   

Abstract

Genomic DNA base composition (GC content) is predicted to significantly affect genome functioning and species ecology. Although several hypotheses have been put forward to address the biological impact of GC content variation in microbial and vertebrate organisms, the biological significance of GC content diversity in plants remains unclear because of a lack of sufficiently robust genomic data. Using flow cytometry, we report genomic GC contents for 239 species representing 70 of 78 monocot families and compare them with genomic characters, a suite of life history traits and climatic niche data using phylogeny-based statistics. GC content of monocots varied between 33.6% and 48.9%, with several groups exceeding the GC content known for any other vascular plant group, highlighting their unusual genome architecture and organization. GC content showed a quadratic relationship with genome size, with the decreases in GC content in larger genomes possibly being a consequence of the higher biochemical costs of GC base synthesis. Dramatic decreases in GC content were observed in species with holocentric chromosomes, whereas increased GC content was documented in species able to grow in seasonally cold and/or dry climates, possibly indicating an advantage of GC-rich DNA during cell freezing and desiccation. We also show that genomic adaptations associated with changing GC content might have played a significant role in the evolution of the Earth's contemporary biota, such as the rise of grass-dominated biomes during the mid-Tertiary. One of the major selective advantages of GC-rich DNA is hypothesized to be facilitating more complex gene regulation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Poaceae; genome size evolution; geographical stratification; phylogenetic regression; plant genome

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25225383      PMCID: PMC4191780          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1321152111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  46 in total

1.  Foldable structures and the natural design of pollen grains.

Authors:  Eleni Katifori; Silas Alben; Enrique Cerda; David R Nelson; Jacques Dumais
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-04-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Mechanisms of recent genome size variation in flowering plants.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Bennetzen; Jianxin Ma; Katrien M Devos
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Evidence of selectively driven codon usage in rice: implications for GC content evolution of Gramineae genes.

Authors:  Xingyi Guo; Jiandong Bao; Longjiang Fan
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 4.124

4.  Genome size and GC-percent in vertebrates as determined by flow cytometry: the triangular relationship.

Authors:  A E Vinogradov
Journal:  Cytometry       Date:  1998-02-01

5.  Intrinsic conformational properties of deoxyribonucleosides: implicated role for cytosine in the equilibrium among the A, B, and Z forms of DNA.

Authors:  N Foloppe; A D MacKerell
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Lack of correlation between AT frequency and genome size in higher plants and the effect of nonrandomness of base sequences on dye binding.

Authors:  Martin Barow; Armin Meister
Journal:  Cytometry       Date:  2002-01-01

7.  Comparative complete genome sequence analysis of the amino acid replacements responsible for the thermostability of Corynebacterium efficiens.

Authors:  Yousuke Nishio; Yoji Nakamura; Yutaka Kawarabayasi; Yoshihiro Usuda; Eiichiro Kimura; Shinichi Sugimoto; Kazuhiko Matsui; Akihiko Yamagishi; Hisashi Kikuchi; Kazuho Ikeo; Takashi Gojobori
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  GC3 biology in corn, rice, sorghum and other grasses.

Authors:  Tatiana V Tatarinova; Nickolai N Alexandrov; John B Bouck; Kenneth A Feldmann
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-05-16       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 9.  Water-DNA interactions as studied by X-ray and neutron fibre diffraction.

Authors:  Watson Fuller; Trevor Forsyth; Arumugam Mahendrasingam
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2004-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Base-stacking and base-pairing contributions into thermal stability of the DNA double helix.

Authors:  Peter Yakovchuk; Ekaterina Protozanova; Maxim D Frank-Kamenetskii
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-01-31       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  80 in total

1.  What's in a genome? The C-value enigma and the evolution of eukaryotic genome content.

Authors:  Tyler A Elliott; T Ryan Gregory
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Evolution of genome size and genomic GC content in carnivorous holokinetics (Droseraceae).

Authors:  Adam Veleba; Petr Šmarda; František Zedek; Lucie Horová; Jakub Šmerda; Petr Bureš
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2016-12-26       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Genome-Based Taxonomic Classification of the Phylum Actinobacteria.

Authors:  Imen Nouioui; Lorena Carro; Marina García-López; Jan P Meier-Kolthoff; Tanja Woyke; Nikos C Kyrpides; Rüdiger Pukall; Hans-Peter Klenk; Michael Goodfellow; Markus Göker
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 5.640

4.  Substantial intraspecific genome size variation in golden-brown algae and its phenotypic consequences.

Authors:  Dora Čertnerová; Pavel Škaloud
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Do holocentric chromosomes represent an evolutionary advantage? A study of paired analyses of diversification rates of lineages with holocentric chromosomes and their monocentric closest relatives.

Authors:  José Ignacio Márquez-Corro; Marcial Escudero; Modesto Luceño
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 5.239

6.  Acidophilic green algal genome provides insights into adaptation to an acidic environment.

Authors:  Shunsuke Hirooka; Yuu Hirose; Yu Kanesaki; Sumio Higuchi; Takayuki Fujiwara; Ryo Onuma; Atsuko Era; Ryudo Ohbayashi; Akihiro Uzuka; Hisayoshi Nozaki; Hirofumi Yoshikawa; Shin-Ya Miyagishima
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Environmental pressures on stomatal size may drive plant genome size evolution: evidence from a natural experiment with Cape geophytes.

Authors:  Pavel Veselý; Petr Šmarda; Petr Bureš; Charles Stirton; A Muthama Muasya; Ladislav Mucina; Lucie Horová; Kristýna Veselá; Alexandra Šilerová; Jakub Šmerda; Ondřej Knápek
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 4.357

8.  Identification and characterization of SSR markers of Guadua chacoensis (Rojas) Londoño & P.M. Peterson and transferability to other bamboo species.

Authors:  Márcia D Rossarolla; Tiago C Tomazetti; Leila N Vieira; Miguel P Guerra; Gustavo H F Klabunde; Ramon F Scherer; Rosete Pescador; Rubens O Nodari
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 2.406

9.  Assessment of genetic diversity among four orchids based on ddRAD sequencing data for conservation purposes.

Authors:  Subhas Chandra Roy; Kaushik Moitra; Dilip De Sarker
Journal:  Physiol Mol Biol Plants       Date:  2016-12-29

10.  Reconstructing the genome of the most recent common ancestor of flowering plants.

Authors:  Florent Murat; Alix Armero; Caroline Pont; Christophe Klopp; Jérôme Salse
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 38.330

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.