Literature DB >> 29043597

Do holocentric chromosomes represent an evolutionary advantage? A study of paired analyses of diversification rates of lineages with holocentric chromosomes and their monocentric closest relatives.

José Ignacio Márquez-Corro1, Marcial Escudero2, Modesto Luceño3.   

Abstract

Despite most of the cytogenetic research is focused on monocentric chromosomes, chromosomes with kinetochoric activity localized in a single centromere, several studies have been centered on holocentric chromosomes which have diffuse kinetochoric activity along the chromosomes. The eukaryotic organisms that present this type of chromosomes have been relatively understudied despite they constitute rather diversified species lineages. On the one hand, holocentric chromosomes may present intrinsic benefits (chromosome mutations such as fissions and fusions are potentially neutral in holocentrics). On the other hand, they present restrictions to the spatial separation of the functions of recombination and segregation during meiotic divisions (functions that may interfere), separation that is found in monocentric chromosomes. In this study, we compare the diversification rates of all known holocentric lineages in animals and plants with their most related monocentric lineages in order to elucidate whether holocentric chromosomes constitute an evolutionary advantage in terms of diversification and species richness. The results showed that null hypothesis of equal mean diversification rates cannot be rejected, leading us to surmise that shifts in diversification rates between holocentric and monocentric lineages might be due to other factors, such as the idiosyncrasy of each lineage or the interplay of evolutionary selections with the benefits of having either monocentric or holocentric chromosomes.

Keywords:  Centromere; chromosome; diversification rates; holocentric; phylogeny

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29043597     DOI: 10.1007/s10577-017-9566-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosome Res        ISSN: 0967-3849            Impact factor:   5.239


  52 in total

1.  Selection and inertia in the evolution of holocentric chromosomes in sedges (Carex, Cyperaceae).

Authors:  Marcial Escudero; Andrew L Hipp; Thomas F Hansen; Kjetil L Voje; Modesto Luceño
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 10.151

Review 2.  Neocentrics and holokinetics (holocentrics): chromosomes out of the centromeric rules.

Authors:  M Guerra; G Cabral; M Cuacos; M González-García; M González-Sánchez; J Vega; M J Puertas
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 1.636

3.  Holocentric chromosomes in meiosis. II. The modes of orientation and segregation of a trivalent.

Authors:  S Nokkala; V G Kuznetsova; A Maryanska-Nadachowska; C Nokkala
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 5.239

4.  GEIGER: investigating evolutionary radiations.

Authors:  Luke J Harmon; Jason T Weir; Chad D Brock; Richard E Glor; Wendell Challenger
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Karyotype and male pre-reductional meiosis of the sharpshooter Tapajosa rubromarginata (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae).

Authors:  Graciela R de Bigliardo; Eduardo Gabriel Virla; Sara Caro; Santiago Murillo Dasso
Journal:  Rev Biol Trop       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 0.723

6.  Evolution of genome size and genomic GC content in carnivorous holokinetics (Droseraceae).

Authors:  Adam Veleba; Petr Šmarda; František Zedek; Lucie Horová; Jakub Šmerda; Petr Bureš
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2016-12-26       Impact factor: 4.357

7.  A world checklist of Onychophora (velvet worms), with notes on nomenclature and status of names.

Authors:  Ivo de Sena Oliveira; V Morley St J Read; Georg Mayer
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 1.546

8.  Differential role of CENP-A in the segregation of holocentric C. elegans chromosomes during meiosis and mitosis.

Authors:  Joost Monen; Paul S Maddox; Francie Hyndman; Karen Oegema; Arshad Desai
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2005-11-06       Impact factor: 28.824

9.  Sex-Linked Chromosome Heterozygosity in Males of Tityus confluens (Buthidae): A Clue about the Presence of Sex Chromosomes in Scorpions.

Authors:  Renzo Sebastián Adilardi; Andrés Alejandro Ojanguren-Affilastro; Liliana María Mola
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Spider phylogenomics: untangling the Spider Tree of Life.

Authors:  Nicole L Garrison; Juanita Rodriguez; Ingi Agnarsson; Jonathan A Coddington; Charles E Griswold; Christopher A Hamilton; Marshal Hedin; Kevin M Kocot; Joel M Ledford; Jason E Bond
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 2.984

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Meiosis Progression and Recombination in Holocentric Plants: What Is Known?

Authors:  Paulo G Hofstatter; Gokilavani Thangavel; Marco Castellani; André Marques
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 2.  Epigenetics as an Evolutionary Tool for Centromere Flexibility.

Authors:  Laura Leo; Marcella Marchetti; Simona Giunta; Laura Fanti
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 4.096

3.  Analysis of the small chromosomal Prionium serratum (Cyperid) demonstrates the importance of reliable methods to differentiate between mono- and holocentricity.

Authors:  M Baez; Y T Kuo; Y Dias; T Souza; A Boudichevskaia; J Fuchs; V Schubert; A L L Vanzela; A Pedrosa-Harand; A Houben
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 4.316

4.  Holocentric chromosomes.

Authors:  Mauro Mandrioli; Gian Carlo Manicardi
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 5.  Nematode chromosomes.

Authors:  Peter M Carlton; Richard E Davis; Shawn Ahmed
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 4.402

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.