Pavel Veselý1, Petr Šmarda1, Petr Bureš1, Charles Stirton2, A Muthama Muasya2, Ladislav Mucina3,4, Lucie Horová1, Kristýna Veselá1, Alexandra Šilerová1, Jakub Šmerda1, Ondřej Knápek1. 1. Department of Botany and Zoology, Masaryk University, Kotlářská, Brno, Czech Republic. 2. Bolus Herbarium, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, Cape Town, South Africa. 3. Iluka Chair in Vegetation Science and Biogeography, Harry Butler Institute, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Perth, Australia. 4. Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, Stellenbosch University, Matieland, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The idea that genome (size) evolution in eukaryotes could be driven by environmental factors is still vigorously debated. In extant plants, genome size correlates positively with stomatal size, leading to the idea that conditions enabling the existence of large stomata in fossil plants also supported growth of their genome size. We test this inductive assumption in drought-adapted, prostrate-leaved Cape (South Africa) geophytes where, compared with their upright-leaved geophytic ancestors, stomata develop in a favourably humid microclimate formed underneath their leaves. METHODS: Stomatal parameters (leaf cuticle imprints) and genome size (flow cytometry) were measured in 16 closely related geophytic species pairs from seven plant families. In each pair, representing a different genus, we contrasted a prostrate-leaved species with its upright-leaved phylogenetic relative, the latter whose stomata are exposed to the ambient arid climate. KEY RESULTS: Except for one, all prostrate-leaves species had larger stomata, and in 13 of 16 pairs they also had larger genomes than their upright-leaved relatives. Stomatal density and theoretical maximum conductance were less in prostrate-leaved species with small guard cells (<1 pL) but showed no systematic difference in species pairs with larger guard cells (>1 pL). Giant stomata were observed in the prostrate-leaved Satyrium bicorne (89-137 µm long), despite its relatively small genome (2C = 9 Gbp). CONCLUSIONS: Our results imply that climate, through selection on stomatal size, might be able to drive genome size evolution in plants. The data support the idea that plants from 'greenhouse' geological periods with large stomata might have generally had larger genome sizes when compared with extant plants, though this might not have been solely due to higher atmospheric CO2 in these periods but could also have been due to humid conditions prevailing at fossil deposit sites.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The idea that genome (size) evolution in eukaryotes could be driven by environmental factors is still vigorously debated. In extant plants, genome size correlates positively with stomatal size, leading to the idea that conditions enabling the existence of large stomata in fossil plants also supported growth of their genome size. We test this inductive assumption in drought-adapted, prostrate-leaved Cape (South Africa) geophytes where, compared with their upright-leaved geophytic ancestors, stomata develop in a favourably humid microclimate formed underneath their leaves. METHODS: Stomatal parameters (leaf cuticle imprints) and genome size (flow cytometry) were measured in 16 closely related geophytic species pairs from seven plant families. In each pair, representing a different genus, we contrasted a prostrate-leaved species with its upright-leaved phylogenetic relative, the latter whose stomata are exposed to the ambient arid climate. KEY RESULTS: Except for one, all prostrate-leaves species had larger stomata, and in 13 of 16 pairs they also had larger genomes than their upright-leaved relatives. Stomatal density and theoretical maximum conductance were less in prostrate-leaved species with small guard cells (<1 pL) but showed no systematic difference in species pairs with larger guard cells (>1 pL). Giant stomata were observed in the prostrate-leaved Satyrium bicorne (89-137 µm long), despite its relatively small genome (2C = 9 Gbp). CONCLUSIONS: Our results imply that climate, through selection on stomatal size, might be able to drive genome size evolution in plants. The data support the idea that plants from 'greenhouse' geological periods with large stomata might have generally had larger genome sizes when compared with extant plants, though this might not have been solely due to higher atmospheric CO2 in these periods but could also have been due to humid conditions prevailing at fossil deposit sites.
Authors: G Anthony Verboom; Jenny K Archibald; Freek T Bakker; Dirk U Bellstedt; Ferozah Conrad; Leanne L Dreyer; Félix Forest; Chloé Galley; Peter Goldblatt; Jack F Henning; Klaus Mummenhoff; H Peter Linder; A Muthama Muasya; Kenneth C Oberlander; Vincent Savolainen; Deidre A Snijman; Timotheüs van der Niet; Tracey L Nowell Journal: Mol Phylogenet Evol Date: 2008-03-05 Impact factor: 4.286
Authors: Johannes Schindelin; Ignacio Arganda-Carreras; Erwin Frise; Verena Kaynig; Mark Longair; Tobias Pietzsch; Stephan Preibisch; Curtis Rueden; Stephan Saalfeld; Benjamin Schmid; Jean-Yves Tinevez; Daniel James White; Volker Hartenstein; Kevin Eliceiri; Pavel Tomancak; Albert Cardona Journal: Nat Methods Date: 2012-06-28 Impact factor: 28.547
Authors: T Ryan Gregory; James A Nicol; Heidi Tamm; Bellis Kullman; Kaur Kullman; Ilia J Leitch; Brian G Murray; Donald F Kapraun; Johann Greilhuber; Michael D Bennett Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2006-11-07 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Ana Paula Moraes; Thaissa Brogliato Junqueira Engel; Eliana R Forni-Martins; Fábio de Barros; Leonardo P Felix; Juliano Sarmento Cabral Journal: Ann Bot Date: 2022-07-19 Impact factor: 5.040
Authors: Juan José Domínguez-Delgado; Javier López-Jurado; Enrique Mateos-Naranjo; Francisco Balao Journal: J Exp Bot Date: 2021-07-28 Impact factor: 6.992