Literature DB >> 26318437

Stimulus-response correspondence in go-nogo and choice tasks: Are reactions altered by the presence of an irrelevant salient object?

Mei-Ching Lien1, Logan Pedersen2, Robert W Proctor3.   

Abstract

In 2-choice tasks, responses are faster when stimulus location corresponds to response location, even when stimulus location is irrelevant. Dolk et al. (J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 39:1248-1260, 2013a) found this stimulus-response correspondence effect with a single response location in a go-nogo task when an irrelevant Japanese waving cat was present. They argued that salient objects trigger spatial coding of the response relative to that object. We examined this claim using both behavioral and lateralized readiness potential (LRP) measures. In Experiment 1 participants determined the pitch of a left- or right-positioned tone, whereas in Experiment 2 they determined the color of a dot within a centrally located hand pointing left, right, or straight ahead. In both experiments, participants performed a go-nogo task with the right-index finger and a 2-choice task with both index fingers, with a left-positioned Japanese waving cat present or absent. For the go-nogo task, the cat induced a correspondence effect on response times (RT) to the tones (Experiment 1) but not the visual stimuli (Experiment 2). For the 2-choice task, a correspondence effect was evident in all conditions in both experiments. Cat's presence/absence did not significantly modulate the effect for right and left responses, although there was a trend toward increased RT and LRP for right responses in Experiment 1. The results imply that a salient, irrelevant object could provide a reference frame for response coding when attention is available to process it, as is likely in an auditory task (Experiment 1) but not a visual task (Experiment 2).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26318437     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-015-0699-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  56 in total

1.  A response-discrimination account of the Simon effect.

Authors:  Ulrich Ansorge; Peter Wiihr
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  A common coding framework in self-other interaction: evidence from joint action task.

Authors:  Chia-Chin Tsai; Wen-Jui Kuo; Jung-Tai Jing; Daisy L Hung; Ovid J-L Tzeng
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-06-24       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The auditory-evoked N2 and P3 components in the stop-signal task: indices of inhibition, response-conflict or error-detection?

Authors:  Aneta Dimoska; Stuart J Johnstone; Robert J Barry
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  Do's and don'ts with lateralized event-related brain potentials.

Authors:  Peter Praamstra
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Covert motor activity on NoGo trials in a task sharing paradigm: evidence from the lateralized readiness potential.

Authors:  Antje Holländer; Christina Jung; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-30       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  N2, P3 and the lateralized readiness potential in a nogo task involving selective response priming.

Authors:  B Kopp; U Mattler; R Goertz; F Rist
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-07

7.  Dissociation between behavioral and psychophysiological measures of response preparation.

Authors:  J Miller; M G Coles; S Chakraborty
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1996-11

8.  Visual selective attention: introductory remarks.

Authors:  O Neumann; A H van der Heijden; D A Allport
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1986

9.  Use of partial stimulus information in response processing.

Authors:  R de Jong; M Wierda; G Mulder; L J Mulder
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  How "social" is the social Simon effect?

Authors:  Thomas Dolk; Bernhard Hommel; Lorenza S Colzato; Simone Schütz-Bosbach; Wolfgang Prinz; Roman Liepelt
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-05-06
View more
  6 in total

1.  No evidence of task co-representation in a joint Stroop task.

Authors:  Daniel R Saunders; David Melcher; Wieske van Zoest
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-08-29

2.  The influence of the Japanese waving cat on the joint spatial compatibility effect: A replication and extension of Dolk, Hommel, Prinz, and Liepelt (2013).

Authors:  Lydia Puffe; Kerstin Dittrich; Karl Christoph Klauer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  The effect of grasp compatibility in go/no-go and two-choice tasks.

Authors:  Diane Pecher; Sander Roest; René Zeelenberg
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-08

4.  The Multimodal Go-Nogo Simon Effect: Signifying the Relevance of Stimulus Features in the Go-Nogo Simon Paradigm Impacts Event Representations and Task Performance.

Authors:  Thomas Dolk; Roman Liepelt
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-10-25

5.  Spatial auditory presentation of a partner's presence induces the social Simon effect.

Authors:  Arina Kiridoshi; Makoto Otani; Wataru Teramoto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  When a Social Experimenter Overwrites Effects of Salient Objects in an Individual Go/No-Go Simon Task - An ERP Study.

Authors:  René Michel; Jens Bölte; Roman Liepelt
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-05-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.