Literature DB >> 15292975

Experimental disentangling of spatial-compatibility and interhemispheric-relay effects in simple reaction time (Poffenberger paradigm).

Claude M J Braun1, Caroline Larocque, André Achim.   

Abstract

Spatial-compatibility effects can be obtained in simple reaction time (SRT) provided that spatially distinct responses are frequently required. Since this effect is limited to trials with relatively long reaction times (RTs), Hommel (1996b) proposed that if the response does not occur shortly after stimulus detection, then the spatial code of the stimulus can interfere with that of the response. A series of experiments is reported showing that (a) spatial compatibility in SRT to lateralized stimuli is not an alternative, but rather a complementary, explanation to interhemispheric transfer time (contrary to what Hommel surmised), and (b) the spatial compatibility component is essentially limited to the first trial after shifting response preparation from one-half of the visual fields to the other, suggesting a mechanism akin to an orienting response.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15292975     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-1858-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  26 in total

1.  Pathways of interhemispheric transfer in normals and in a split-brain subject. A positron emission tomography study.

Authors:  C A Marzi; D Perani; G Tassinari; A Colleluori; A Maravita; C Miniussi; E Paulesu; P Scifo; F Fazio
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  CRT screens may give rise to biased estimates of interhemispheric transmission time in the Poffenberger paradigm.

Authors:  E Ratinckx; M Brysbaert; E Vermeulen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Splitting visual space with attention.

Authors:  R Nicoletti; C Umiltá
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Bilateral hemispheric control of foot distal movements: evidence from normal subjects.

Authors:  S Aglioti; R Dall'Agnola; M Girelli; C A Marzi
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.027

Review 5.  Estimation of interhemispheric dynamics from simple unimanual reaction time to extrafoveal stimuli.

Authors:  C M Braun
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 7.444

6.  Interhemispheric neural summation in the absence of the corpus callosum.

Authors:  M C Corballis
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 13.501

7.  Brain-behavior relationships: evidence from practice effects in spatial stimulus-response compatibility.

Authors:  M Iacoboni; R P Woods; J C Mazziotta
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code.

Authors:  R J Wallace
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1971-06

9.  Does so-called interhemispheric transfer time depend on attention?

Authors:  C M Braun; S Daigneault; A Dufresne; S Miljours; I Collin
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1995

10.  Left-right asymmetry of callosal transfer in normal human subjects.

Authors:  P Bisiacchi; C A Marzi; R Nicoletti; G Carena; C Mucignat; F Tomaiuolo
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1994-10-20       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  3 in total

1.  The role of task history in simple reaction time to lateralized light flashes.

Authors:  Eric Mooshagian; Marco Iacoboni; Eran Zaidel
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2007-09-19       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Effects of stimulus pair orientation and hand switching on reaction time estimates of interhemispheric transfer.

Authors:  Yanick Leblanc-Sirois; Claude M J Braun; Jonathan Elie-Fortier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Interhemispheric integration in visual search.

Authors:  Stewart Shipp
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 3.139

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.