Literature DB >> 25223355

Evaluation of ettringite-related swelling mechanisms for treated chromite ore processing residue.

Deok Hyun Moon1, Mahmoud Wazne, Dimitris Dermatas, Adriana M Sanchez, Kyung Hoon Cheong, Jeong-Hun Park.   

Abstract

Accelerated one-dimensional unconfined swell tests were conducted for ferrous sulfate chromite ore processing residue (COPR) field-treated samples. The field-treated samples were subjected to wet and dry cycles over 100 days to accelerate the lithification of the samples. Parallel laboratory experiments were performed to investigate the effects of mineralogy on COPR swell under controlled conditions. The field and laboratory samples were treated with ferrous sulfate at a ferrous-to-Cr(6+) molar stoichiometric ratios of eight (8×) and five (5×). X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM)-energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) analyses were used to investigate the mineralogical changes upon treatment. The swell results indicated that significant COPR swelling was observed in all of the tested samples. The swelling was more pronounced in the 5× treated COPR sample than in the 8× treated COPR sample. Moreover, the laboratory-treated samples showed greater swelling behavior as compared with the field-treated samples, which was most probably due to the high dry density of the COPR, indicating that dry density was a more dominant factor than lithification. XRPD and SEM-EDX results confirmed that significant ettringite formation occurred in all treated samples.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25223355     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-014-3554-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  10 in total

1.  Long-term treatment issues with chromite ore processing residue (COPR): Cr(6+) reduction and heave.

Authors:  Deok Hyun Moon; Mahmoud Wazne; Dimitris Dermatas; Christos Christodoulatos; Adriana M Sanchez; Dennis G Grubb; Maria Chrysochoou; Min Gyu Kim
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 10.588

2.  Assessment of calcium polysulfide for the remediation of hexavalent chromium in chromite ore processing residue (COPR).

Authors:  Mahmoud Wazne; Santhi Chandra Jagupilla; Deok Hyun Moon; Sarath Chandra Jagupilla; Christos Christodoulatos; Min Gyu Kim
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 10.588

3.  Evaluation of ettringite and hydrocalumite formation for heavy metal immobilization: literature review and experimental study.

Authors:  Maria Chrysochoou; Dimitris Dermatas
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 10.588

4.  Peer reviewed: the challenge of remediating chromium-contaminated soil.

Authors:  B R James
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  1996-05-23       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Application of sequential extractions and X-ray absorption spectroscopy to determine the speciation of chromium in Northern New Jersey marsh soils developed in chromite ore processing residue (COPR).

Authors:  Evert J Elzinga; Ashley Cirmo
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 10.588

6.  Chromium speciation and fractionation in ground and surface waters in the vicinity of chromite ore processing residue disposal sites.

Authors:  John G Farmer; Rhodri P Thomas; Margaret C Graham; Jeanine S Geelhoed; David G Lumsdon; Edward Paterson
Journal:  J Environ Monit       Date:  2002-04

7.  Ettringite-induced heave in chromite ore processing residue (COPR) upon ferrous sulfate treatment.

Authors:  Dimitris Dermatas; Maria Chrysochoou; Deok Hyun Moon; Dennis G Grubb; Mahmoud Wazne; Christos Christodoulatos
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Calcium polysulfide remediation of hexavalent chromium contamination from chromite ore processing residue.

Authors:  Margaret C Graham; John G Farmer; Peter Anderson; Edward Paterson; Stephen Hillier; David G Lumsdon; Richard J F Bewley
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2006-01-26       Impact factor: 7.963

9.  Effects of particle size and acid addition on the remediation of chromite ore processing residue using ferrous sulfate.

Authors:  Santhi Chandra Jagupilla; Deok Hyun Moon; Mahmoud Wazne; Christos Christodoulatos; Min Gyu Kim
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 10.588

10.  Chromite ore processing residue in Hudson County, New Jersey.

Authors:  T Burke; J Fagliano; M Goldoft; R E Hazen; R Iglewicz; T McKee
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 9.031

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.