Literature DB >> 17275184

Long-term treatment issues with chromite ore processing residue (COPR): Cr(6+) reduction and heave.

Deok Hyun Moon1, Mahmoud Wazne, Dimitris Dermatas, Christos Christodoulatos, Adriana M Sanchez, Dennis G Grubb, Maria Chrysochoou, Min Gyu Kim.   

Abstract

A pugmill treatability study was conducted to remediate chromite ore processing residue (COPR) using ferrous sulfate heptahydrate (FeSO(4) x 7H(2)O) as a reductant. Two different types of COPR, with respect to particle size and mineralogy, were tested in this study. Two different stoichiometric ratios of FeSO(4) x 7H(2)O to Cr(6+) (5x and 8x) were applied to reduce Cr(6+) to Cr(3+). The effectiveness of FeSO(4).7H(2)O treatment was assessed using the toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) tests and X-ray absorption near edge structure (XANES) analyses. TCLP results obtained from the pugmill treatability study showed that TCLP Cr concentrations were less than the TCLP regulatory limit of 5mg/L upon 8x FeSO(4) x 7H(2)O treatment for up to 420 days but may fail to meet this regulatory limit in the long-term. XANES results obtained from samples cured for 300 days showed that all of the treated samples failed the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) clean up level for Cr(6+) of 240 mg/kg. However, the Cr(6+) concentration from the sample with the smaller particle size approached 240 mg/kg (338 mg/kg), suggesting that particle size reduction prior to the addition of reductant may improve the effectiveness of the treatment. COPR heaving was investigated with unconfined swell tests upon 5x and 8x FeSO(4) x 7H(2)O treatment. The formation of ettringite, an expansive material, was investigated following the swell tests using X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD). Significant heaving (>50 vol%) was observed at curing times of 138 days for the 5x treatment and the ettringite formation was identified by XRPD analyses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17275184     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.01.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hazard Mater        ISSN: 0304-3894            Impact factor:   10.588


  5 in total

1.  Evaluation of ettringite-related swelling mechanisms for treated chromite ore processing residue.

Authors:  Deok Hyun Moon; Mahmoud Wazne; Dimitris Dermatas; Adriana M Sanchez; Kyung Hoon Cheong; Jeong-Hun Park
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Biotreatment of chromite ore processing residue by Pannonibacter phragmitetus BB.

Authors:  Yangyang Wang; Zhihui Yang; Bing Peng; Liyuan Chai; Baolin Wu; Ruiping Wu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Effective treatment of alkaline Cr(VI) contaminated leachate using a novel Pd-bionanocatalyst: Impact of electron donor and aqueous geochemistry.

Authors:  Mathew P Watts; Victoria S Coker; Stephen A Parry; Russell A P Thomas; Robert Kalin; Jonathan R Lloyd
Journal:  Appl Catal B       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 19.503

4.  Biogenic nano-magnetite and nano-zero valent iron treatment of alkaline Cr(VI) leachate and chromite ore processing residue.

Authors:  Mathew P Watts; Victoria S Coker; Stephen A Parry; Richard A D Pattrick; Russell A P Thomas; Robert Kalin; Jonathan R Lloyd
Journal:  Appl Geochem       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.524

5.  Factors Affecting the Detection of Hexavalent Chromium in Cr-Contaminated Soil.

Authors:  Mingtao Huang; Guoyu Ding; Xianghua Yan; Pinhua Rao; Xingrun Wang; Xiaoguang Meng; Qiantao Shi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-07       Impact factor: 4.614

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.