Literature DB >> 16442591

Calcium polysulfide remediation of hexavalent chromium contamination from chromite ore processing residue.

Margaret C Graham1, John G Farmer, Peter Anderson, Edward Paterson, Stephen Hillier, David G Lumsdon, Richard J F Bewley.   

Abstract

Past disposal of high-lime chromite ore processing residue (COPR) from a chemical works in S.E. Glasgow, UK, has led to continuing release of toxic and carcinogenic hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) to groundwaters which are highly contaminated with Cr(VI)O4(2-). Traditional methods of remediating Cr(VI)-contaminated land, e.g. using ferrous sulfate and organic matter, have had limited success in converting Cr(VI) to less harmful and insoluble Cr(III). This paper describes the first application of calcium polysulfide (CaS(x)) to the remediation of contaminated groundwater and high-lime COPR in a series of laboratory experiments, which have demonstrated the effectiveness of the treatment in quantitatively and rapidly reducing Cr(VI) to Cr(III) over the pH range (8-12.5) typically found at the sites. Cr(III)-organic complexes, present in groundwater at one location, were also effectively precipitated upon treatment with CaS(x). The potential for large-scale use of CaS(x) in the remediation of Cr(VI) from COPR is also discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16442591     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.11.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  7 in total

Review 1.  Strategies for improving human health in contaminated situations: a review of past, present and possible future approaches.

Authors:  John G Farmer; Richard Jarvis
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 4.609

2.  Physicochemical and biological quality of soil in hexavalent chromium-contaminated soils as affected by chemical and microbial remediation.

Authors:  Yingping Liao; Xiaobo Min; Zhihui Yang; Liyuan Chai; Shujuan Zhang; Yangyang Wang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Assessing chromite ore processing residue (COPR) waste dump site using electrical resistivity tomography (ERT): a case study from Umaran, Kanpur, India.

Authors:  Utsav Mishra; Athul Chandroth; Aurobindo Kumar Basantaray; Sujit Chel; Animesh Mandal
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Evaluation of ettringite-related swelling mechanisms for treated chromite ore processing residue.

Authors:  Deok Hyun Moon; Mahmoud Wazne; Dimitris Dermatas; Adriana M Sanchez; Kyung Hoon Cheong; Jeong-Hun Park
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Biotreatment of chromite ore processing residue by Pannonibacter phragmitetus BB.

Authors:  Yangyang Wang; Zhihui Yang; Bing Peng; Liyuan Chai; Baolin Wu; Ruiping Wu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Biogenic nano-magnetite and nano-zero valent iron treatment of alkaline Cr(VI) leachate and chromite ore processing residue.

Authors:  Mathew P Watts; Victoria S Coker; Stephen A Parry; Richard A D Pattrick; Russell A P Thomas; Robert Kalin; Jonathan R Lloyd
Journal:  Appl Geochem       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.524

7.  Cyclic drying and wetting tests on combined remediation of chromium-contaminated soil by calcium polysulfide, synthetic zeolite and cement.

Authors:  Xilin Li; Xiaowan Yu; Ling Liu; Jianlin Yang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.