Literature DB >> 17007141

Ettringite-induced heave in chromite ore processing residue (COPR) upon ferrous sulfate treatment.

Dimitris Dermatas1, Maria Chrysochoou, Deok Hyun Moon, Dennis G Grubb, Mahmoud Wazne, Christos Christodoulatos.   

Abstract

A pilot-scale treatment study was implemented at a deposition site of chromite ore processing residue (COPR) in New Jersey. Ferrous sulfate heptahydrate (FeSO4 x 7H2O) was employed to reduce hexavalent chromium in two dosages with three types of soil mixing equipment. XANES analyses of treated samples cured for 240 days indicated that all treatment combinations failed to meet the Cr(VI) regulatory limit of 240 mg/kg. More importantly, the discrepancy between XANES and alkaline digestion results renders the latter unreliable for regulatory purposes when applied to ferrous-treated COPR. Regardless of Cr-(VI), the introduction of reductant containing sulfate, mechanical mixing, water, acidity, and the resulting temperature increase in treated COPR promoted dissolution of brownmillerite (Ca2FeAlO5), releasing alumina and alkalinity. The pH increase caused initially precipitated gypsum (CaSO4 x 2H2O) to progressively convert to ettringite (Ca6Al2(SO4)3 x 32H2O) and its associated volume expansion under both in situ and ex situ conditions, with a maximum of 0.8 m vertical swell within 40 days of curing. While Cr-(VI) treatment remains a challenge, the intentional exhaustion of the heave potential of COPR by transforming all Al sources to ettringite emerges as a possible solution to delayed ettringite formation, which would hamper site redevelopment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17007141     DOI: 10.1021/es0604461

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  5 in total

1.  Physicochemical and biological quality of soil in hexavalent chromium-contaminated soils as affected by chemical and microbial remediation.

Authors:  Yingping Liao; Xiaobo Min; Zhihui Yang; Liyuan Chai; Shujuan Zhang; Yangyang Wang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Evaluation of ettringite-related swelling mechanisms for treated chromite ore processing residue.

Authors:  Deok Hyun Moon; Mahmoud Wazne; Dimitris Dermatas; Adriana M Sanchez; Kyung Hoon Cheong; Jeong-Hun Park
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Biotreatment of chromite ore processing residue by Pannonibacter phragmitetus BB.

Authors:  Yangyang Wang; Zhihui Yang; Bing Peng; Liyuan Chai; Baolin Wu; Ruiping Wu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Biogenic nano-magnetite and nano-zero valent iron treatment of alkaline Cr(VI) leachate and chromite ore processing residue.

Authors:  Mathew P Watts; Victoria S Coker; Stephen A Parry; Richard A D Pattrick; Russell A P Thomas; Robert Kalin; Jonathan R Lloyd
Journal:  Appl Geochem       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.524

5.  Factors Affecting the Detection of Hexavalent Chromium in Cr-Contaminated Soil.

Authors:  Mingtao Huang; Guoyu Ding; Xianghua Yan; Pinhua Rao; Xingrun Wang; Xiaoguang Meng; Qiantao Shi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-07       Impact factor: 4.614

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.