Literature DB >> 2522107

Single-channel vibrotactile supplements to visual perception of intonation and stress.

L E Bernstein1, S P Eberhardt, M E Demorest.   

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to explore the effectiveness of a single vibrotactile stimulator to convey intonation (question versus statement) and contrastive stress (on one of the first three words of four 4- or 5-word sentences). In experiment I, artificially deafened normal-hearing subjects judged stress and intonation in counterbalanced visual-alone and visual-tactile conditions. Six voice fundamental frequency-to-tactile transformations were tested. Two sentence types were voiced throughout, and two contained unvoiced consonants. Benefits to speechreading were significant, but small. No differences among transformations were observed. In experiment II, only the tactile stimuli were presented. Significant differences emerged among the transformations, with larger differences for intonation than for stress judgments. Surprisingly, tactile-alone intonation identification was more accurate than visual-tactile for several transformations.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2522107     DOI: 10.1121/1.397690

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  10 in total

1.  The influence of the lexicon on speech read word recognition: contrasting segmental and lexical distinctiveness.

Authors:  Edward T Auer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-06

2.  Seeing a singer helps comprehension of the song's lyrics.

Authors:  Alexandra Jesse; Dominic W Massaro
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-06

Review 3.  Temporal context in speech processing and attentional stream selection: a behavioral and neural perspective.

Authors:  Elana M Zion Golumbic; David Poeppel; Charles E Schroeder
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2012-01-29       Impact factor: 2.381

Review 4.  Multisensory Integration in Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Ryan A Stevenson; Sterling W Sheffield; Iliza M Butera; René H Gifford; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 5.  Lipreading: A Review of Its Continuing Importance for Speech Recognition With an Acquired Hearing Loss and Possibilities for Effective Training.

Authors:  Lynne E Bernstein; Nicole Jordan; Edward T Auer; Silvio P Eberhardt
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 1.636

6.  Multisensory training can promote or impede visual perceptual learning of speech stimuli: visual-tactile vs. visual-auditory training.

Authors:  Silvio P Eberhardt; Edward T Auer; Lynne E Bernstein
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 7.  Neural pathways for visual speech perception.

Authors:  Lynne E Bernstein; Einat Liebenthal
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Rhythm on Your Lips.

Authors:  Marcela Peña; Alan Langus; César Gutiérrez; Daniela Huepe-Artigas; Marina Nespor
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-11-08

9.  End-to-End Lip-Reading Open Cloud-Based Speech Architecture.

Authors:  Sanghun Jeon; Mun Sang Kim
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  Prosody in the hands of the speaker.

Authors:  Bahia Guellaï; Alan Langus; Marina Nespor
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-07
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.