Literature DB >> 25213917

Factors affecting catheter contact in the human left atrium and their impact on ablation efficacy.

Waqas Ullah1, Ross J Hunter, Victoria Baker, Mehul B Dhinoja, Simon Sporton, Mark J Earley, Richard J Schilling.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Preclinical work suggests factors including catheter orientation and contact consistency during individual radiofrequency ablations influence lesion size. Our aim was to investigate factors affecting catheter contact in the left atrium (LA) and their effects on ablation. METHODS AND
RESULTS: A total of 2,298 8-second static LA mapping points were studied in 30 patients undergoing ablation for AF (16 in AF, 14 sinus rhythm [SR], 18 remote robotic navigation [RRN] procedures) using a contact force (CF) sensing catheter. CF variability (CFV: difference between 20 Hz-sampled CF waveform mean peak and trough) increased with mean CF, Spearman's ρ = 0.6, P < 0.005. Catheter drift correlated weakly with CF (Pearson's correlation -0.06, P = 0.005). CFV was higher in SR than AF and with RRN (P < 0.001). In AF, there was less catheter drift for RRN than manual navigation points but the converse was true in SR. In 747 static 30 second LA ablations, the influence of contact parameters on ablation efficacy was compared by multivariate analysis of impedance drop during ablation: a lesser drop suggesting reduced efficacy. For a given force time integral (FTI), increased CFV (>5 g) and locational drift (>3.5 mm), perpendicular contact, SR and RRN usage were associated with a lesser impedance drop with ablation (P < 0.005 for each), suggesting reduced efficacy.
CONCLUSIONS: Beyond the FTI, the quality of catheter contact influences ablation efficacy, and clinical catheter contact is affected by multiple factors, including the atrial rhythm and catheter navigation mode. Maximal efficacy is provided by parallel contact with CFV ≤5 g, catheter drift ≤3.5 mm, and manual navigation.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  atrial fibrillation; catheter ablation; contact force; contact orientation; contact stability; impedance

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25213917     DOI: 10.1111/jce.12542

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  4 in total

Review 1.  Contact Force and Atrial Fibrillation Ablation.

Authors:  W Ullah; R J Schilling; T Wong
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2016-02-29

2.  Contact forces during hybrid atrial fibrillation ablation: an in vitro evaluation.

Authors:  Pieter W J Lozekoot; Monique M J de Jong; Sandro Gelsomino; Orlando Parise; Francesco Matteucci; Fabiana Lucà; N Kumar; Jan Nijs; Jens Czapla; Paul Kwant; Daniele Bani; Gian Franco Gensini; Laurent Pison; Harry J G M Crijns; Jos G Maessen; Mark La Meir
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  A Pilot Study on Parameter Setting of VisiTag™ Module during Pulmonary Vein Isolation.

Authors:  Yu-Chuan Wang; Bo Huang; Kang Li; Peng-Kang He; Er-Dong Chen; Yu-Long Xia; Jie Jiang; Qin-Hui Sheng; Jing Zhou; Yan-Sheng Ding
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 1.866

4.  Impact of catheter contact angle on lesion formation and durability of pulmonary vein isolation.

Authors:  Masayuki Ohta; Kentaro Hayashi; Hiroyuki Sato; Takahiro Noto; Kandoh Kawahatsu; Masaya Katagiri; Tomohiro Mita; Yoshio Kazuno; Shunsuke Sasaki; Takahiro Doi; Mitsugu Hirokami; Satoshi Yuda
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 1.759

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.