Literature DB >> 25213270

Hybrid simulation using mixed reality for interventional ultrasound imaging training.

C Freschi1, S Parrini, N Dinelli, M Ferrari, V Ferrari.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Ultrasound (US) imaging offers advantages over other imaging modalities and has become the most widespread modality for many diagnostic and interventional procedures. However, traditional 2D US requires a long training period, especially to learn how to manipulate the probe. A hybrid interactive system based on mixed reality was designed, implemented and tested for hand-eye coordination training in diagnostic and interventional US.
METHODS: A hybrid simulator was developed integrating a physical US phantom and a software application with a 3D virtual scene. In this scene, a 3D model of the probe with its relative scan plane is coherently displayed with a 3D representation of the phantom internal structures. An evaluation study of the diagnostic module was performed by recruiting thirty-six novices and four experts. The performances of the hybrid (HG) versus physical (PG) simulator were compared. After the training session, each novice was required to visualize a particular target structure. The four experts completed a 5-point Likert scale questionnaire.
RESULTS: Seventy-eight percentage of the HG novices successfully visualized the target structure, whereas only 45% of the PG reached this goal. The mean scores from the questionnaires were 5.00 for usefulness, 4.25 for ease of use, 4.75 for 3D perception, and 3.25 for phantom realism.
CONCLUSIONS: The hybrid US training simulator provides ease of use and is effective as a hand-eye coordination teaching tool. Mixed reality can improve US probe manipulation training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25213270     DOI: 10.1007/s11548-014-1113-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  17 in total

1.  Simulation in surgical training: educational issues and practical implications.

Authors:  Roger Kneebone
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 6.251

Review 2.  Role of simulation-based education in ultrasound practice training.

Authors:  Harbir S Sidhu; Babajide O Olubaniyi; Gauraang Bhatnagar; Vivien Shuen; Paul Dubbins
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.153

3.  EndoCAS navigator platform: a common platform for computer and robotic assistance in minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Giuseppe Megali; Vincenzo Ferrari; Cinzia Freschi; Bruno Morabito; Filippo Cavallo; Giuseppe Turini; Elena Troia; Carla Cappelli; Andrea Pietrabissa; Oliver Tonet; Alfred Cuschieri; Paolo Dario; Franco Mosca
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.547

4.  Ultrasound guided robotic biopsy using augmented reality and human-robot cooperative control.

Authors:  C Freschi; E Troia; V Ferrari; G Megali; A Pietrabissa; F Mosca
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2009

5.  How to build patient-specific synthetic abdominal anatomies. An innovative approach from physical toward hybrid surgical simulators.

Authors:  S Condino; M Carbone; V Ferrari; L Faggioni; A Peri; M Ferrari; F Mosca
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 2.547

6.  Perk Tutor: an open-source training platform for ultrasound-guided needle insertions.

Authors:  Tamas Ungi; Derek Sargent; Eric Moult; Andras Lasso; Csaba Pinter; Robert C McGraw; Gabor Fichtinger
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  Validation of virtual reality simulation for obstetric ultrasonography: a prospective cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Christy Burden; Jessica Preshaw; Paul White; Timothy J Draycott; Simon Grant; Robert Fox
Journal:  Simul Healthc       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.929

8.  A virtual reality simulator for ultrasound-guided biopsy training.

Authors:  S S M Ho
Journal:  IEEE Comput Graph Appl       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.088

9.  Virtual-reality simulation-based training in ultrasound.

Authors:  L Konge; E Albrecht-Beste; M B Nielsen
Journal:  Ultraschall Med       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 6.548

10.  ImaGiNe Seldinger: first simulator for Seldinger technique and angiography training.

Authors:  V Luboz; Y Zhang; S Johnson; Y Song; C Kilkenny; C Hunt; H Woolnough; S Guediri; J Zhai; T Odetoyinbo; P Littler; A Fisher; C Hughes; N Chalmers; D Kessel; P J Clough; J Ward; R Phillips; T How; A Bulpitt; N W John; F Bello; D Gould
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 5.428

View more
  2 in total

1.  Patient-specific ultrasound liver phantom: materials and fabrication method.

Authors:  Alessia Pacioni; Marina Carbone; Cinzia Freschi; Rosanna Viglialoro; Vincenzo Ferrari; Mauro Ferrari
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Randomized, noninferiority study between video versus hand ultrasound with wet foam dressing materials to simulate B-lines in lung ultrasound: A CONSORT-compliant article.

Authors:  Eun Jung Park; Young Tak Yoon; Chong Kun Hong; Young Rock Ha; Jung Hwan Ahn
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.889

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.