PURPOSE: Quantitative MRI techniques were utilized to study intervertebral disc degeneration. Main focus was to develop a novel approach to quantify disc height loss associated with disc degeneration. Currently there is no universally accepted metric of degeneration based on measurement of disc height. Such quantitative imaging methods would complement qualitative visual assessment methods currently used and offer a valuable diagnostic tool. METHODS: 51 adult participants took part in this MRI study. T2 weighted images were used to obtain disc height index (DHI) and also a semi-quantitative metric based on relative voxel intensities. For DHI, each disc was given a score based on standard deviations from the mean DHI of healthy discs. Diffusion Weighted MRI was used to assess morphological changes in the nucleus pulposus. Conventional Pfirrmann classification was used as the gold standard to assess these quantitative approaches. RESULTS: At deviations of up to 1.5σ below normative disc height, levels of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and normalized T2 intensity were maintained. Once disc compression reached 1.5σ, there was a massive drop in ADC and normalized T2 intensity. Pfirrmann degeneration scores also increased after the 1.5σ mark. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides new, unbiased quantitative imaging tools to assess disc degeneration. We observed that these quantitative MRI measures indicate a threshold beyond which major pathological changes take place concurrently. Combined information from DHI, ADC and T2 images construct a set of novel biomarkers that could be used to identify degenerating discs that are approaching the threshold and possibly intervene before major pathologic changes occur.
PURPOSE: Quantitative MRI techniques were utilized to study intervertebral disc degeneration. Main focus was to develop a novel approach to quantify disc height loss associated with disc degeneration. Currently there is no universally accepted metric of degeneration based on measurement of disc height. Such quantitative imaging methods would complement qualitative visual assessment methods currently used and offer a valuable diagnostic tool. METHODS: 51 adult participants took part in this MRI study. T2 weighted images were used to obtain disc height index (DHI) and also a semi-quantitative metric based on relative voxel intensities. For DHI, each disc was given a score based on standard deviations from the mean DHI of healthy discs. Diffusion Weighted MRI was used to assess morphological changes in the nucleus pulposus. Conventional Pfirrmann classification was used as the gold standard to assess these quantitative approaches. RESULTS: At deviations of up to 1.5σ below normative disc height, levels of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and normalized T2 intensity were maintained. Once disc compression reached 1.5σ, there was a massive drop in ADC and normalized T2 intensity. Pfirrmann degeneration scores also increased after the 1.5σ mark. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides new, unbiased quantitative imaging tools to assess disc degeneration. We observed that these quantitative MRI measures indicate a threshold beyond which major pathological changes take place concurrently. Combined information from DHI, ADC and T2 images construct a set of novel biomarkers that could be used to identify degenerating discs that are approaching the threshold and possibly intervene before major pathologic changes occur.
Authors: L I Kerttula; J P Jauhiainen; O Tervonen; I J Suramo; A Koivula; J T Oikarinen Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2000-08 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Norbert Boos; Sabine Weissbach; Helmut Rohrbach; Christoph Weiler; Kevin F Spratt; Andreas G Nerlich Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2002-12-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Jeffrey S Roh; Andelle L Teng; Jung U Yoo; John Davis; Christopher Furey; Henry H Bohlman Journal: Orthop Clin North Am Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 2.472
Authors: D J Quint; G F Tuite; J D Stern; S E Doran; S M Papadopoulos; J E McGillicuddy; C A Lundquist Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 1997-11 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Seth A Smith; Richard A E Edden; Jonathan A D Farrell; Peter B Barker; Peter C M Van Zijl Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: James F Griffith; Yi-Xiang J Wang; Gregory E Antonio; Kai Chow Choi; Alfred Yu; Anil T Ahuja; Ping Chung Leung Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2007-11-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Apostolos H Fyllos; Dimitrios L Arvanitis; Apostolos H Karantanas; Sokratis E Varitimidis; Michael Hantes; Aristeidis H Zibis Journal: Surg Radiol Anat Date: 2018-06-06 Impact factor: 1.246
Authors: Julio Urrutia; Pablo Besa; Mauricio Campos; Pablo Cikutovic; Mario Cabezon; Marcelo Molina; Juan Pablo Cruz Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2016-02-15 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Olga N Leonova; Elizaveta E Elgaeva; Tatiana S Golubeva; Alexey V Peleganchuk; Aleksandr V Krutko; Yurii S Aulchenko; Yakov A Tsepilov Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-05-13 Impact factor: 3.752