Apostolos H Fyllos1,2, Dimitrios L Arvanitis1, Apostolos H Karantanas3, Sokratis E Varitimidis2, Michael Hantes2, Aristeidis H Zibis4. 1. Department of Anatomy, School of Medicine, University of Thessaly, Panepistimiou 3 (Biopolis), 41110, Larissa, Greece. 2. Department of Orthopedics, University Hospital of Larisa, 41110, Larissa, Greece. 3. Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of Crete, 71110, Heraklion, Greece. 4. Department of Anatomy, School of Medicine, University of Thessaly, Panepistimiou 3 (Biopolis), 41110, Larissa, Greece. ahzibis@gmail.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study aims to: (a) quantify and evaluate normal relationships between neighboring spinal units using MR imaging indices, (b) propose an easy-to-apply-and-reproduce method of estimating the correct amount of distraction when surgically restoring a collapsed intervertebral disc, based on individualized measurements. METHODS: This is a retrospective cross-sectional MR imaging study of 119 adult subjects, aged 18-54, asymptomatic for low back pain. Each of the examinees should demonstrate two or more consecutive intervertebral discs classified as Pfirrmann grade I or II to be included. We measured and studied the relationships of disc height index, Dabbs index, Farfan index, disc convexity index and mean and posterior disc height per spinal level using multiple regression analysis. All measurements were tested for intra- and interobserver agreement by two raters. RESULTS: DHI, Dabbs, Farfan, and mean disc height had a statistically significant correlation with the spinal level and age. Our results were highly reproducible, with excellent inter- and intraobserver agreement and reliability between two raters (ICC = 0.992 and 0.994, respectively). Furthermore, we expressed each intervertebral space as a percentage of its adjacent space, introducing the coefficient α factor for every intervertebral space. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that a normal values' database to refer during preoperative planning of correction of a degenerated intervertebral disc is feasible. Our study offers new anatomical and radiological insight in terms of spinal measurements and their potential correlation with current surgical techniques. A new approach for calculating disc space as an expression of its adjacent disc has been introduced with various potential applications.
PURPOSE: This study aims to: (a) quantify and evaluate normal relationships between neighboring spinal units using MR imaging indices, (b) propose an easy-to-apply-and-reproduce method of estimating the correct amount of distraction when surgically restoring a collapsed intervertebral disc, based on individualized measurements. METHODS: This is a retrospective cross-sectional MR imaging study of 119 adult subjects, aged 18-54, asymptomatic for low back pain. Each of the examinees should demonstrate two or more consecutive intervertebral discs classified as Pfirrmann grade I or II to be included. We measured and studied the relationships of disc height index, Dabbs index, Farfan index, disc convexity index and mean and posterior disc height per spinal level using multiple regression analysis. All measurements were tested for intra- and interobserver agreement by two raters. RESULTS: DHI, Dabbs, Farfan, and mean disc height had a statistically significant correlation with the spinal level and age. Our results were highly reproducible, with excellent inter- and intraobserver agreement and reliability between two raters (ICC = 0.992 and 0.994, respectively). Furthermore, we expressed each intervertebral space as a percentage of its adjacent space, introducing the coefficient α factor for every intervertebral space. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that a normal values' database to refer during preoperative planning of correction of a degenerated intervertebral disc is feasible. Our study offers new anatomical and radiological insight in terms of spinal measurements and their potential correlation with current surgical techniques. A new approach for calculating disc space as an expression of its adjacent disc has been introduced with various potential applications.
Entities:
Keywords:
Anatomy; Intervertebral disc; Magnetic resonance imaging; Spine
Authors: Anne F Mannion; Gunnar Leivseth; Jens-Ivar Brox; Peter Fritzell; Olle Hägg; Jeremy C T Fairbank Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2014-08-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Christoph J Siepe; Wolfgang Hitzl; Peter Meschede; Ajay K Sharma; Mohamed F Khattab; Michael H Mayer Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2009-04-20 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Patrick Strube; Eike K Hoff; Marc Schürings; Hendrik Schmidt; Marcel Dreischarf; Antonius Rohlmann; Michael Putzier Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2013-08-23 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Kai-Uwe LewandrowskI; Narendran Muraleedharan; Steven Allen Eddy; Vikram Sobti; Brian D Reece; Jorge Felipe Ramírez León; Sandeep Shah Journal: Int J Spine Surg Date: 2020-12