Xiaojian Hu1, Mingjian Chen1, Jianjiang Pan1, Liang Liang2, Yue Wang3. 1. Spine Lab, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, 79# Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310003, People's Republic of China. 2. The Wallace H. Coulter, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30313, USA. 3. Spine Lab, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, 79# Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310003, People's Republic of China. wangyuespine@zju.edu.cn.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Even though phenotypes of disc degeneration vary on different sagittal magnetic resonance images (MRI), measurements typically are acquired on the mid-sagittal MRI. This study investigated the appropriateness of using the mid-sagittal MRI to measure various phenotypes of age-related disc degeneration. METHODS: Lumbar spine MRIs of 66 subjects (mean age 50.3 years, standard deviation 16.5 years, range 22-84 years) were studied. An image analysis program Spine Explorer was used to obtain quantitative measurements for disc height, bulging, and signal on para- and mid-sagittal T2-weighted MRIs. Measurements on para- and mid-sagittal MRIs and their associations with age were compared. RESULTS: Measurements of disc height, signal, and posterior disc bulging acquired on the mid-sagittal MRI were greater than those on the para-sagittal MRIs. Disc height measurements were not linearly associated with age. Greater age was correlated with greater anterior (r = 0.45, P < 0.001) and posterior (r = 0.33, P < 0.01) bulging on para-sagittal MRIs, but not posterior disc bulging on the mid-sagittal MRI (r = - 0.10, P > 0.05). Disc signal intensity measurements on the mid-sagittal MRI had stronger correlations with age than those on para-sagittal MRIs. Mean and standard deviation of disc signal intensity acquired on the mid-sagittal MRI had the strongest correlations with age among all measures of disc degeneration studied (r = - 0.50, - 0.67, respectively, P < 0.001 for both). CONCLUSIONS: Disc signal measurements acquired on the mid-sagittal MRI were reliable and had strong correlations with age and thus can be used as an appropriate measure of disc degeneration. Disc bulging had better be measured on para-sagittal MRIs. Although severe disc narrowing clearly is a sign of severe disc degeneration, disc height was not linearly associated with age.
PURPOSE: Even though phenotypes of disc degeneration vary on different sagittal magnetic resonance images (MRI), measurements typically are acquired on the mid-sagittal MRI. This study investigated the appropriateness of using the mid-sagittal MRI to measure various phenotypes of age-related disc degeneration. METHODS: Lumbar spine MRIs of 66 subjects (mean age 50.3 years, standard deviation 16.5 years, range 22-84 years) were studied. An image analysis program Spine Explorer was used to obtain quantitative measurements for disc height, bulging, and signal on para- and mid-sagittal T2-weighted MRIs. Measurements on para- and mid-sagittal MRIs and their associations with age were compared. RESULTS: Measurements of disc height, signal, and posterior disc bulging acquired on the mid-sagittal MRI were greater than those on the para-sagittal MRIs. Disc height measurements were not linearly associated with age. Greater age was correlated with greater anterior (r = 0.45, P < 0.001) and posterior (r = 0.33, P < 0.01) bulging on para-sagittal MRIs, but not posterior disc bulging on the mid-sagittal MRI (r = - 0.10, P > 0.05). Disc signal intensity measurements on the mid-sagittal MRI had stronger correlations with age than those on para-sagittal MRIs. Mean and standard deviation of disc signal intensity acquired on the mid-sagittal MRI had the strongest correlations with age among all measures of disc degeneration studied (r = - 0.50, - 0.67, respectively, P < 0.001 for both). CONCLUSIONS: Disc signal measurements acquired on the mid-sagittal MRI were reliable and had strong correlations with age and thus can be used as an appropriate measure of disc degeneration. Disc bulging had better be measured on para-sagittal MRIs. Although severe disc narrowing clearly is a sign of severe disc degeneration, disc height was not linearly associated with age.
Authors: Norbert Boos; Sabine Weissbach; Helmut Rohrbach; Christoph Weiler; Kevin F Spratt; Andreas G Nerlich Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2002-12-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: K Luoma; H Riihimäki; R Luukkonen; R Raininko; E Viikari-Juntura; A Lamminen Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2000-02-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: James F Griffith; Yi-Xiang J Wang; Gregory E Antonio; Kai Chow Choi; Alfred Yu; Anil T Ahuja; Ping Chung Leung Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2007-11-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Tapio Videman; Michele C Battié; Eric Parent; Laura E Gibbons; Pauli Vainio; Jaakko Kaprio Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2008-06-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Kai-Uwe LewandrowskI; Narendran Muraleedharan; Steven Allen Eddy; Vikram Sobti; Brian D Reece; Jorge Felipe Ramírez León; Sandeep Shah Journal: Int J Spine Surg Date: 2020-12
Authors: Anni Aavikko; Martina Lohman; Leena Ristolainen; Hannu Kautiainen; Kalevi Österman; Dietrich Schlenzka; Teija Lund Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2022-03-25 Impact factor: 2.721
Authors: Daniel L Belavy; Patrick J Owen; Gabriele Armbrecht; Martin Bansmann; Jochen Zange; Yuan Ling; Regina Pohle-Fröhlich; Dieter Felsenberg Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-04-14 Impact factor: 3.240