Literature DB >> 17850387

Outcomes using a fourth-generation lithotripter: a new benchmark for comparison?

Michael S Nomikos1, Steven J Sowter, David A Tolley.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of a fourth-generation lithotripter, the Sonolith Vision (Technomed Medical Systems, Vaulx-en-Velin, France) for treating single previously untreated renal calculi, and to compare the results with the reference standard HM-3 (Dornier MedTech Europe GmbH, Wessling, Germany) in the same population originally studied by the USA Cooperative Study Group in 1986. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Sonolith Vision uses an innovative electroconductive shock-wave generator with an elliptical reflector specially designed to give the maximum concentration of energy on the stone. We reviewed the treatment sessions from our prospectively maintained database of the first 1000 consecutive patients with urinary stone disease who were treated with the Sonolith Vision between September 2004 and March 2006. Patients with previously untreated solitary renal calculi in anatomically normal kidneys were included. The outcome was assessed by plain films for radio-opaque stones, and renal ultrasonography for radiolucent stones, at 1 and 3 months after lithotripsy; the results were analysed according to stone size and location.
RESULTS: Data from 309 patients who had a complete follow-up and with 373 renal calculi that matched the above criteria were analysed. The initial fragmentation rate was 94%. The stone-free rate for stones of <10 mm was 77%, for 11-20 mm was 69% and for >20 mm was 50%. The overall stone-free rate 3 months after lithotripsy was 75%. Within a month of lithotripsy, 221 patients (59%) became stone-free. Additional procedures to render patients stone-free after lithotripsy were needed in only 22 cases (7%). The overall efficiency quotient was 62%. The stone-free rates for lower, upper, middle calyceal and renal pelvic calculi were 74%, 70%, 78.5% and 75%, respectively. There were no serious complications.
CONCLUSIONS: When similar populations of stone formers were assessed the Sonolith Vision achieved a high success rate, comparable with that using the HM-3 machine but with lower analgesia requirements and very low re-treatment rates. This method of comparison belies the commonly held view that newer lithotripters are less effective than the original spark-gap machines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17850387     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07117.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  7 in total

1.  The management of ureteric stones.

Authors:  S Phipps; D A Tolley; J G Young; F X Keeley
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Extracorporeal Shock-wave Lithotripsy Success Rate and Complications: Initial Experience at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital.

Authors:  Mohammed S Al-Marhoon; Omar Shareef; Ismail S Al-Habsi; Ataalrahman S Al Balushi; Josephkunju Mathew; Krishna P Venkiteswaran
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2013-07

3.  The usefulness of stone density and patient stoutness in predicting extracorporeal shock wave efficiency: Results in a North African ethnic group.

Authors:  Hamdoune Abdelaziz; Yassine Elabiad; Ilyas Aderrouj; Abdellatif Janane; Mohamed Ghadouane; Ahmed Ameur; Mohamed Abbar
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Extracorporeal lithotripsy endoscopically controlled by ureterorenoscopy (LECURS): a new concept for the treatment of kidney stones-first clinical experience using digital ureterorenoscopes.

Authors:  Olivier Traxer; Julien Letendre
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-08-03       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Treatment of upper urinary tract stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) Sonolith vision.

Authors:  Kogenta Nakamura; Motoi Tobiume; Masahiro Narushima; Takahiko Yoshizawa; Genya Nishikawa; Yoshiharu Kato; Remi Katsuda; Kenji Zennami; Shigeyuki Aoki; Yoshiaki Yamada; Nobuaki Honda; Makoto Sumitomo
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 2.264

6.  The effect of stone and patient characteristics in predicting extra-corporal shock wave lithotripsy success rate: A cross sectional study.

Authors:  Mohammad Al-Zubi; Ammar Al Sleibi; Basel Mazen Elayan; Subhi Zahi Al-Issawi; Morad Bani-Hani; Adel Alsharei; Jad AlSmadi; Saleh Abualhaj; Ala' Y Ibrahim
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-09-10

7.  Factors Affecting the Outcome of Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy in Urinary Stone Treatment.

Authors:  Sanjay Shinde; Younis Al Balushi; Medhat Hossny; Sachin Jose; Salma Al Busaidy
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2018-05
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.