BACKGROUND: This study assessed attitudes of breast cancer patients toward molecular testing for personalized therapy and research. METHODS: A questionnaire was given to female breast cancer patients presenting to a cancer center. Associations between demographic and clinical variables and attitudes toward molecular testing were evaluated. RESULTS: Three hundred eight patients were approached, and 100 completed the questionnaire (a 32% response rate). Most participants were willing to undergo molecular testing to assist in the selection of approved drugs (81%) and experimental therapy (59%) if testing was covered by insurance. Most participants were white (71%). Even if testing was financially covered, nonwhite participants were less willing to undergo molecular testing for the selection of approved drugs (54% of nonwhites vs 90% of whites, odds ratio [OR] = 0.13, P = .0004) or experimental drugs (35% vs 68%, OR = 0.26, P = .0072). Most participants (75%) were willing to undergo a biopsy to guide therapy, and 46% were willing to undergo research biopsies. Nonwhite participants were less willing to undergo research biopsies (17% vs 55%, OR = 0.17, P = .0033). Most participants wanted to be informed when research results had implications for treatment (91%), new cancer risk (90%), and other preventable/treatable diseases (87%). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients were willing to undergo molecular testing and minimally invasive procedures to guide approved or experimental therapy. There were significant differences in attitudes toward molecular testing between racial groups; nonwhites were less willing to undergo testing even if the results would guide their own therapy. Novel approaches are needed to prevent disparities in the delivery of genomically informed care and to increase minority participation in biomarker-driven trials. Cancer 2015;121:243-50.
BACKGROUND: This study assessed attitudes of breast cancerpatients toward molecular testing for personalized therapy and research. METHODS: A questionnaire was given to female breast cancerpatients presenting to a cancer center. Associations between demographic and clinical variables and attitudes toward molecular testing were evaluated. RESULTS: Three hundred eight patients were approached, and 100 completed the questionnaire (a 32% response rate). Most participants were willing to undergo molecular testing to assist in the selection of approved drugs (81%) and experimental therapy (59%) if testing was covered by insurance. Most participants were white (71%). Even if testing was financially covered, nonwhite participants were less willing to undergo molecular testing for the selection of approved drugs (54% of nonwhites vs 90% of whites, odds ratio [OR] = 0.13, P = .0004) or experimental drugs (35% vs 68%, OR = 0.26, P = .0072). Most participants (75%) were willing to undergo a biopsy to guide therapy, and 46% were willing to undergo research biopsies. Nonwhite participants were less willing to undergo research biopsies (17% vs 55%, OR = 0.17, P = .0033). Most participants wanted to be informed when research results had implications for treatment (91%), new cancer risk (90%), and other preventable/treatable diseases (87%). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients were willing to undergo molecular testing and minimally invasive procedures to guide approved or experimental therapy. There were significant differences in attitudes toward molecular testing between racial groups; nonwhites were less willing to undergo testing even if the results would guide their own therapy. Novel approaches are needed to prevent disparities in the delivery of genomically informed care and to increase minority participation in biomarker-driven trials. Cancer 2015;121:243-50.
Authors: Anjali S Advani; Benjamin Atkeson; Carrie L Brown; Bercedis L Peterson; Laura Fish; Jeffrey L Johnson; Jon P Gockerman; Marc Gautier Journal: Cancer Date: 2003-03-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: David E Nelson; Gary L Kreps; Bradford W Hesse; Robert T Croyle; Gordon Willis; Neeraj K Arora; Barbara K Rimer; K V Viswanath; Neil Weinstein; Sara Alden Journal: J Health Commun Date: 2004 Sep-Oct
Authors: Aaro Tupasela; Sinikka Sihvo; Karolna Snell; Pa Jallinoja; Arja R Aro; Elina Hemminki Journal: Scand J Public Health Date: 2009-11-11 Impact factor: 3.021
Authors: Ann H Partridge; Nadia Hackett; Emily Blood; Rebecca Gelman; Steven Joffe; Susan Bauer-Wu; Katherine Knudsen; Karen Emmons; Deborah Collyar; Richard L Schilsky; Eric P Winer Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2004-04-21 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Margaret M Byrne; Stacey L Tannenbaum; Stefan Glück; Judith Hurley; Michael Antoni Journal: Med Decis Making Date: 2013-07-29 Impact factor: 2.583
Authors: Molly Daniels; Chetna Wathoo; Lauren Brusco; Karen H Lu; Kenna Shaw; Ecaterina E Ileana Dumbrava; Banu Arun; Louise Strong; Jennifer K Litton; Karina Eterovic; Ugur Aytac; John Mendelsohn; Gordon B Mills; Ken Chen; Funda Meric-Bernstam Journal: JCO Precis Oncol Date: 2017-10-31
Authors: Jada G Hamilton; Elyse Shuk; Margaux C Genoff; Vivian M Rodríguez; Jennifer L Hay; Kenneth Offit; Mark E Robson Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2017-06-19 Impact factor: 3.840
Authors: Deevakar Rogith; Rafeek A Yusuf; Shelley R Hovick; Bryan M Fellman; Susan K Peterson; Allison M Burton-Chase; Yisheng Li; Elmer V Bernstam; Funda Meric-Bernstam Journal: Int J Med Inform Date: 2016-01-18 Impact factor: 4.046
Authors: F Meric-Bernstam; L Brusco; M Daniels; C Wathoo; A M Bailey; L Strong; K Shaw; K Lu; Y Qi; H Zhao; H Lara-Guerra; J Litton; B Arun; A K Eterovic; U Aytac; M Routbort; V Subbiah; F Janku; M A Davies; S Kopetz; J Mendelsohn; G B Mills; K Chen Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2016-01-19 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Goldy C George; Adrianna Buford; Kenneth Hess; Sarina A Piha-Paul; Ralph Zinner; Vivek Subbiah; Christina Hinojosa; Charles S Cleeland; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Elmer V Bernstam; David S Hong Journal: JCO Clin Cancer Inform Date: 2018-12
Authors: Usha Menon; Kimlin Ashing; Mei Wei Chang; Shannon M Christy; Katarina Friberg-Felsted; Virginia Gil Rivas; Clement K Gwede; Qian Lu; Cathy D Meade; Jamila Sly; Monica Wang; Betina Yanez; Karen Yeary; Jean C Yi; Kassandra I Alcaraz Journal: Nurs Res Date: 2019 Mar/Apr Impact factor: 2.381
Authors: Ann H Partridge; Karen Sepucha; Anne O'Neill; Kathy D Miller; Emily Baker; Chau T Dang; Donald W Northfelt; George W Sledge; Bryan P Schneider Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2017-06-23 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Jada G Hamilton; Elyse Shuk; Margaux Genoff Garzon; Vivian M Rodríguez; Joy Westerman; Jennifer L Hay; Kenneth Offit; Mark E Robson Journal: JCO Precis Oncol Date: 2017-12-21