Literature DB >> 23897588

Participation in cancer clinical trials: why are patients not participating?

Margaret M Byrne1,2, Stacey L Tannenbaum2, Stefan Glück3, Judith Hurley3, Michael Antoni4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Participation in cancer clinical trials is low, particularly in racial and ethnic minorities in some cases, which has negative consequences for the generalizability for study findings. The objective of this study was to determine what factors are associated with patients' participation or willingness to participate and whether these factors vary by race/ethnicity.
DESIGN: or
METHODS: . White, Hispanic, and black participants were obtained through the Florida cancer registry and who were diagnosed with breast, lung, colorectal, or prostate cancer (N = 1100). Participants were surveyed via telephone to obtain demographic information, past participation, and willingness to participate in clinical trials, as well as barriers and facilitators to participation. Logistic and Poisson regressions were performed.
RESULTS: . Respondents were on average 67.4 years old, 42.7% were male, and 50.1% were married. In this population, 7.7% of respondents had participated in a clinical trial, and 36.5% stated that they would be willing to participate. In multivariate models, blacks and Hispanics were equally likely as whites to be willing to participate in cancer trials, but Hispanics were less likely to have participated, and this was especially more likely in non-English-speaking Hispanics compared with English-speaking Hispanics. Notable barriers across race/ethnicity were mistrust and lack of knowledge of clinical trials. Limitations. Cross-sectional design limits cause-and-effect conclusions.
CONCLUSIONS: . There are racial differences in participation rates but not in willingness to participate. We hypothesize that willingness to participate is not very high because people are uninformed about participating, particularly in non-English-speaking Hispanics. Barriers and facilitators to participation vary by race. Improved understanding of cultural differences that can be addressed by physicians may restore faith, comprehension, and acceptability of clinical trials by all patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cohort studies; patient decision making; population-based studies

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23897588     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X13497264

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  57 in total

1.  African Americans and Clinical Research: Evidence Concerning Barriers and Facilitators to Participation and Recruitment Recommendations.

Authors:  Travonia B Hughes; Vijay R Varma; Corinne Pettigrew; Marilyn S Albert
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2017-04-01

2.  Awareness and Perceptions of Clinical Trials in Cancer Patients and Their Families in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Shouki Bazarbashi; Anees Hassan; Ahmed Mohi Eldin; Hussein Soudy; Fazal Hussain
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Patient and physician factors associated with participation in cervical and uterine cancer trials: an NRG/GOG247 study.

Authors:  Sandra E Brooks; Randy L Carter; Steven C Plaxe; Karen M Basen-Engquist; Michael Rodriguez; James Kauderer; Joan L Walker; Tashanna K N Myers; Janet G Drake; Laura J Havrilesky; Linda Van Le; Lisa M Landrum; Carol L Brown
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  Is religiosity related to attitudes toward clinical trials participation?

Authors:  Svetlana Daverio-Zanetti; Kathryn Schultz; Miguel A Martin del Campo; Vanessa Malcarne; Natasha Riley; Georgia Robins Sadler
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  The Development of a Communication Tool to Facilitate the Cancer Trial Recruitment Process and Increase Research Literacy among Underrepresented Populations.

Authors:  Samantha Torres; Erika E de la Riva; Laura S Tom; Marla L Clayman; Chirisse Taylor; Xinqi Dong; Melissa A Simon
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  Discordant attitudes and beliefs about cancer clinical trial participation between physicians, research staff, and cancer patients.

Authors:  Grace C Hillyer; Melissa Beauchemin; Dawn L Hershman; Moshe Kelsen; Frances L Brogan; Rossy Sandoval; Karen M Schmitt; Andria Reyes; Mary Beth Terry; Andrew B Lassman; Gary K Schwartz
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 2.486

7.  Patient preferences toward an interactive e-consent application for research using electronic health records.

Authors:  Christopher A Harle; Elizabeth H Golembiewski; Kiarash P Rahmanian; Janice L Krieger; Dorothy Hagmajer; Arch G Mainous; Ray E Moseley
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Improving informed consent: Stakeholder views.

Authors:  Emily E Anderson; Susan B Newman; Alicia K Matthews
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2017-08-02

9.  The Influence of Patient Identification and Narrative Transportation on Intentions to Participate in Cancer Research.

Authors:  Jordan M Neil; Aisling Gough; Frank Kee; Thomas J George; Jeffrey Pufahl; Janice L Krieger
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.037

10.  The impact of a community-based clinical trial educational intervention among underrepresented Chinese Americans.

Authors:  Grace X Ma; Yin Tan; Natasha C Blakeney; Brenda F Seals; Xiang S Ma; Shumenghui Zhai; Amy Liu; Yanfei Tai; Margo Michaels
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.