Literature DB >> 17549862

Radiolucency and migration after Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Paul Rea1, Andrew Short, Hemant Pandit, Andrew J Price, Peter Kyberd, David J Beard, Harinderjit S Gill, David W Murray.   

Abstract

Radiolucent lines frequently appear on radiographs around unicompartmental knee arthroplasties. It is unknown why this occurs, although the lines usually appear during the first year following the procedure. Knee arthroplasty implants are also known to migrate during the first year. Considering the similarity in the timing of appearance of radiolucency and implant migration, it seems that they could be related. The aim of this study was to determine whether there is a correlation between presence of radiolucency and the migration of Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty implants.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2007        PMID： 17549862

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN： 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  10 in total

1.  Pulsed lavage improves fixation strength of cemented tibial components.

Authors:  Ulf J Schlegel; Jan Siewe; Karl S Delank; Peer Eysel; Klaus Püschel; Michael M Morlock; Anne Gebert de Uhlenbrock
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-10-16       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Pulsed lavage reduces the incidence of radiolucent lines under the tibial tray of Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: pulsed lavage versus syringe lavage.

Authors:  Michael Clarius; Christian Hauck; Joern B Seeger; Andrew James; David W Murray; Peter R Aldinger
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  The Oxford unicompartmental knee fails at a high rate in a high-volume knee practice.

Authors:  William C Schroer; C Lowry Barnes; Paul Diesfeld; Angela LeMarr; Rachel Ingrassia; Diane J Morton; Mary Reedy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  CORR Insights ®: The Oxford unicompartmental knee fails at a high rate in a high-volume knee practice.

Authors:  John M Clark
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-08-24       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  [Revision after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  G Mohr; J Martin; M Clarius
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  A novel standardized algorithm using SPECT/CT evaluating unhappy patients after unicondylar knee arthroplasty--a combined analysis of tracer uptake distribution and component position.

Authors:  Basil Suter; Enrique Testa; Patrick Stämpfli; Praveen Konala; Helmut Rasch; Niklaus F Friederich; Michael T Hirschmann
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 1.930

7.  Variable bone mineral density reductions post-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mahmut Tuncer; Rajesh Patel; Justin P Cobb; Ulrich N Hansen; Andrew A Amis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-04-27       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  The Survivorship and Clinical Results of Minimally Invasive Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty at 10-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Kyung Tae Kim; Song Lee; Jee Hyoung Kim; Sung Won Hong; Woo Shik Jung; Won Shik Shin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2015-05-18

9.  The learning curve for minimally invasive Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: cumulative summation test for learning curve (LC-CUSUM).

Authors:  Qidong Zhang; Qian Zhang; Wanshou Guo; Zhaohui Liu; Liming Cheng; Debo Yue; Nianfei Zhang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  Femoral component failure in the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a case report.

Authors:  Kirsten D S Argelo; Mick A Burger; Marco J M Hoozemans; Olivier P P Temmerman
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2014-12-11
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.