Ryan K Schmocker1, Linda M Cherney Stafford1, Emily R Winslow2. 1. Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison. 2. Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison. Electronic address: winslow@surgery.wisc.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patient satisfaction is a patient-centered outcome of particular interest. Previous work has suggested that global measures of satisfaction may not adequately evaluate surgical care, therefore the surgery-specific Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey was developed. It remains unclear how traditional outcome measures, such as morbidity, impact patient satisfaction. Our aim was to determine whether National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-defined complications impacted satisfaction with the surgeon as measured by a surgery-specific survey, the surgery-specific Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey. METHODS: All patients undergoing a general surgical operation from June 2013-November 2013 were sent the surgery-specific Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey after discharge. Retrospective chart review was conducted using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program variable definitions, and major complications were defined. Data were analyzed as a function of response to the overall surgeon-rating item, and those surgeons rated as the "best possible" or "topbox" were compared with those rated lower. Univariate and logistic regression were used to determine variable importance. RESULTS: A total of 529 patients responded, and 71.5% (378/529) rated the surgeon as topbox. The overall National Surgical Quality Improvement Program complication rate was 14.2% (75/529), with 26.7% of those (20/75) being major complications. On univariate analysis, patients who rated their surgeon more highly were somewhat older (59 vs 54 years: P < .001), more often underwent elective surgery (81% vs 57%: P < .001), and had an increased rate of operation for malignancy (31% vs 17%). Neither the complication rate (total or major) nor the number of complications were associated with satisfaction scores. CONCLUSIONS: When examined on a patient level with surgery-specific measures and outcomes, the presence of complications after an operation does not appear to be associated with overall patient satisfaction with surgeon care. This finding suggests that satisfaction may be an outcome distinct from traditional measures.
BACKGROUND:Patient satisfaction is a patient-centered outcome of particular interest. Previous work has suggested that global measures of satisfaction may not adequately evaluate surgical care, therefore the surgery-specific Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey was developed. It remains unclear how traditional outcome measures, such as morbidity, impact patient satisfaction. Our aim was to determine whether National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-defined complications impacted satisfaction with the surgeon as measured by a surgery-specific survey, the surgery-specific Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey. METHODS: All patients undergoing a general surgical operation from June 2013-November 2013 were sent the surgery-specific Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey after discharge. Retrospective chart review was conducted using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program variable definitions, and major complications were defined. Data were analyzed as a function of response to the overall surgeon-rating item, and those surgeons rated as the "best possible" or "topbox" were compared with those rated lower. Univariate and logistic regression were used to determine variable importance. RESULTS: A total of 529 patients responded, and 71.5% (378/529) rated the surgeon as topbox. The overall National Surgical Quality Improvement Program complication rate was 14.2% (75/529), with 26.7% of those (20/75) being major complications. On univariate analysis, patients who rated their surgeon more highly were somewhat older (59 vs 54 years: P < .001), more often underwent elective surgery (81% vs 57%: P < .001), and had an increased rate of operation for malignancy (31% vs 17%). Neither the complication rate (total or major) nor the number of complications were associated with satisfaction scores. CONCLUSIONS: When examined on a patient level with surgery-specific measures and outcomes, the presence of complications after an operation does not appear to be associated with overall patient satisfaction with surgeon care. This finding suggests that satisfaction may be an outcome distinct from traditional measures.
Authors: Tejal K Gandhi; E Cook Francis; Ann Louise Puopolo; Helen R Burstin; Jennifer S Haas; Troyen A Brennan Journal: Med Care Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Marc N Elliott; William G Lehrman; Megan K Beckett; Elizabeth Goldstein; Katrin Hambarsoomian; Laura A Giordano Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2012-02-29 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Ryan K Schmocker; Sara E Holden; Xia Vang; Stephanie T Lumpkin; Linda M Cherney Stafford; Glen E Leverson; Emily R Winslow Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2015-12-13 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: Bradford D Winters; Aamir Bharmal; Renee F Wilson; Allen Zhang; Lilly Engineer; Deidre Defoe; Eric B Bass; Sydney Dy; Peter J Pronovost Journal: Med Care Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Daniel S Tawfik; Annette Scheid; Jochen Profit; Tait Shanafelt; Mickey Trockel; Kathryn C Adair; J Bryan Sexton; John P A Ioannidis Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2019-10-08 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Rachel Berkowitz; Joceline Vu; Chad Brummett; Jennifer Waljee; Michael Englesbe; Ryan Howard Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2021-06-01 Impact factor: 13.787