Literature DB >> 2520364

Discriminative ability of total body bone-mineral measured by dual photon absorptiometry.

A Gotfredsen1, J Pødenphant, L Nilas, C Christiansen.   

Abstract

We investigated the discriminative ability of total body bone-mineral expressed as the total body bone-density (TBBD) measured by dual photon absorptiometry (DPA) in 79 healthy premenopausal women, 27 healthy postmenopausal women, and 120 female osteoporotic fracture patients presenting with either Colles' fracture, vertebral fracture or femoral neck-fracture. TBBD was compared to the bone-mineral density of the lumbar spine (BMDspine) also measured by DPA, and to the bone-mineral content of the forearms (BMCforearm) measured by single photon absorptiometry (SPA). TBBD, BMDspine and BMCforearm showed that all the fracture patient groups had significantly reduced bone-mass. Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, we found that TBBD had a tendency towards better discriminative ability than BMDspine or BMCforearm with regard to the discrimination between healthy premenopausal women and the three types of osteoporotic fractures (not significant in spinal fracture patients). BMCforearm had an intermediate position, whereas BMDspine had the smallest discriminative ability. TBBD also discriminated better between healthy postmenopausal women and hip-fracture patients than BMDspine or BMCforearm, whereas there was no significant difference between the three methods regarding the discrimination between the healthy postmenopausal women and the Colles' and spinal fracture patients. We conclude that the TBBD measurement by DPA has a discriminative potential which is better than the local spine or forearm measurements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2520364     DOI: 10.3109/00365518909105410

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest        ISSN: 0036-5513            Impact factor:   1.713


  18 in total

1.  Comparison between metacarpal bone measurements by computarized radiogrammetry and total body DEXA in normal and osteoporotic women.

Authors:  H Rico; M Revilla; L F Villa; J F Martin-Santos; J L Cardenas; E Fraile
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 2.  Measurement of bone mineral density.

Authors:  C Hassager; C Christiansen
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 3.  Investigational protease inhibitors as antiretroviral therapies.

Authors:  Narasimha M Midde; Benjamin J Patters; Pss Rao; Theodore J Cory; Santosh Kumar
Journal:  Expert Opin Investig Drugs       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 6.206

4.  Does a single local absorptiometric bone measurement indicate the overall skeletal status? Implications for osteoporosis and osteoarthritis of the hip.

Authors:  A Gotfredsen; B J Riis; C Christiansen; P Rødbro
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  Effects of age and menopause on bone density of entire skeleton in healthy and osteoporotic women.

Authors:  R Nuti; G Martini
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Bone changes in postmenopausal Spanish women.

Authors:  H Rico; E R Hernández; M Revilla; L F Villa; M Alvarez de Buergo; E Cuende
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Dual-photon and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for the measurement of total-body bone mineral and soft tissue composition.

Authors:  M Fischer
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1993-04

8.  Total and regional bone mineral content and fracture rate in postmenopausal osteoporosis treated with salmon calcitonin: a prospective study.

Authors:  H Rico; M Revilla; E R Hernández; L F Villa; M Alvarez de Buergo
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  The impact of degenerative conditions in the spine on bone mineral density and fracture risk prediction.

Authors:  P von der Recke; M A Hansen; K Overgaard; C Christiansen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  The impact of measurement errors on the diagnostic value of bone mass measurements: theoretical considerations.

Authors:  C Hassager; S B Jensen; A Gotfredsen; C Christiansen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.