Literature DB >> 32605940

Poststroke Impairment and Recovery Are Predicted by Task-Specific Regionalization of Injury.

Matthew S Jeffers1,2, Boris Touvykine3, Allyson Ripley1, Gillian Lahey4, Anthony Carter2, Numa Dancause3, Dale Corbett5,2.   

Abstract

Lesion size and location affect the magnitude of impairment and recovery following stroke, but the precise relationship between these variables and functional outcome is unknown. Herein, we systematically varied the size of strokes in motor cortex and surrounding regions to assess effects on impairment and recovery of function. Female Sprague Dawley rats (N = 64) were evaluated for skilled reaching, spontaneous limb use, and limb placement over a 7 week period after stroke. Exploration and reaching were also tested in a free ranging, more naturalistic, environment. MRI voxel-based analysis of injury volume and its likelihood of including the caudal forelimb area (CFA), rostral forelimb area (RFA), hindlimb (HL) cortex (based on intracranial microstimulation), or their bordering regions were related to both impairment and recovery. Severity of impairment on each task was best predicted by injury in unique regions: impaired reaching, by damage in voxels encompassing CFA/RFA; hindlimb placement, by damage in HL; and spontaneous forelimb use, by damage in CFA. An entirely different set of voxels predicted recovery of function: damage lateral to RFA reduced recovery of reaching, damage medial to HL reduced recovery of hindlimb placing, and damage lateral to CFA reduced recovery of spontaneous limb use. Precise lesion location is an important, but heretofore relatively neglected, prognostic factor in both preclinical and clinical stroke studies, especially those using region-specific therapies, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT By estimating lesion location relative to cortical motor representations, we established the relationship between individualized lesion location, and functional impairment and recovery in reaching/grasping, spontaneous limb use, and hindlimb placement during walking. We confirmed that stroke results in impairments to specific motor domains linked to the damaged cortical subregion and that damage encroaching on adjacent regions reduces the ability to recover from initial lesion-induced impairments. Each motor domain encompasses unique brain regions that are most associated with recovery and likely represent targets where beneficial reorganization is taking place. Future clinical trials should use individualized therapies (e.g., transcranial magnetic stimulation, intracerebral stem/progenitor cells) that consider precise lesion location and the specific functional impairments of each subject since these variables can markedly affect therapeutic efficacy.
Copyright © 2020 the authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomarkers; lesion location; lesion size; motor representations; recovery; stroke

Year:  2020        PMID: 32605940      PMCID: PMC7392502          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0057-20.2020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  60 in total

1.  The proportional recovery rule for stroke revisited.

Authors:  J W Krakauer; R S Marshall
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 10.422

2.  Plasticity of primary somatosensory cortex paralleling sensorimotor skill recovery from stroke in adult monkeys.

Authors:  C Xerri; M M Merzenich; B E Peterson; W Jenkins
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Functional subdivisions of the rat somatic sensorimotor cortex.

Authors:  T M Barth; T A Jones; T Schallert
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1990-06-18       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Characterizing Spontaneous Motor Recovery Following Cortical and Subcortical Stroke in the Rat.

Authors:  Sudhir Karthikeyan; Matthew Strider Jeffers; Anthony Carter; Dale Corbett
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 3.919

5.  Disparity between functional recovery and daily use of the upper and lower extremities during subacute stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  Debbie Rand; Janice J Eng
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 3.919

6.  Waxholm Space atlas of the Sprague Dawley rat brain.

Authors:  Eszter A Papp; Trygve B Leergaard; Evan Calabrese; G Allan Johnson; Jan G Bjaalie
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-04-12       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Physical activity in hospitalised stroke patients.

Authors:  Tanya West; Julie Bernhardt
Journal:  Stroke Res Treat       Date:  2011-09-28

8.  Is more better? Using metadata to explore dose-response relationships in stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  Keith R Lohse; Catherine E Lang; Lara A Boyd
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 10.170

9.  The Effect of Lesion Size on the Organization of the Ipsilesional and Contralesional Motor Cortex.

Authors:  Boris Touvykine; Babak K Mansoori; Loyda Jean-Charles; Joan Deffeyes; Stephan Quessy; Numa Dancause
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 3.919

10.  PREP2: A biomarker-based algorithm for predicting upper limb function after stroke.

Authors:  Cathy M Stinear; Winston D Byblow; Suzanne J Ackerley; Marie-Claire Smith; Victor M Borges; P Alan Barber
Journal:  Ann Clin Transl Neurol       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 4.511

View more
  7 in total

1.  More than motor impairment: A spatiotemporal analysis of cognitive impairment and associated neuropathological changes following cortical photothrombotic stroke.

Authors:  Sonia Sanchez-Bezanilla; Rebecca J Hood; Lyndsey E Collins-Praino; Renée J Turner; Frederick R Walker; Michael Nilsson; Lin Kooi Ong
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2021-03-28       Impact factor: 6.200

2.  Observational Study of Neuroimaging Biomarkers of Severe Upper Limb Impairment After Stroke.

Authors:  Kathryn Hayward; Jennifer K Ferris; Keith R Lohse; Michael R Borich; Alexandra Borstad; Jessica M Cassidy; Steven C Cramer; Sean P Dukelow; Sonja E Findlater; Rachel L Hawe; Sook-Lei Liew; Jason L Neva; Jill C Stewart; Lara A Boyd
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 11.800

3.  High-resolution micro-CT for 3D infarct characterization and segmentation in mice stroke models.

Authors:  Raquel Pinto; Jan Matula; Andrea Lobo; Maria Gomez-Lazaro; Mafalda Sousa; Tomas Zikmund; Jozef Kaiser; João R Gomes
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Developmental and interventional plasticity of motor maps after perinatal stroke.

Authors:  Sarah Y Zhang; Matthew S Jeffers; Diane C Lagace; Adam Kirton; Gergely Silasi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  Progress and challenges in preclinical stroke recovery research.

Authors:  Victoria Lea Wolf; Adviye Ergul
Journal:  Brain Circ       Date:  2021-12-21

Review 6.  Predicting Individual Treatment Response to rTMS for Motor Recovery After Stroke: A Review and the CanStim Perspective.

Authors:  Franziska E Hildesheim; Alexander N Silver; Adan-Ulises Dominguez-Vargas; Justin W Andrushko; Jodi D Edwards; Numa Dancause; Alexander Thiel
Journal:  Front Rehabil Sci       Date:  2022-02-10

7.  Varied Response of EEG Rhythm to Different tDCS Protocols and Lesion Hemispheres in Stroke Subjects with Upper Limb Dysfunction.

Authors:  Chunfang Wang; Yuanyuan Chen; Peiqing Song; Hongli Yu; Jingang Du; Ying Zhang; Changcheng Sun
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 3.144

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.