Literature DB >> 25198974

A prospective study on the risk of glove fingertip contamination during draping in joint replacement surgery.

D Makki1, K Deierl, A Pandit, S Trakru.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this prospective study was to investigate the risk of contamination of surgical gloves during preparation and draping in joint replacement surgery.
METHODS: During 46 hip and knee replacement procedures, the gloves of orthopaedic consultants (n=5) and registrars (n=3) were assessed for contamination immediately after draping by impression of gloved fingers on blood agar. Contamination was evaluated by the surgeon's grade, the type of procedure, the role of the assistant and the dominance of the hand.
RESULTS: A total of 125 pairs of top gloves were examined (79 pairs from registrars and 46 pairs from consultants). Bacterial contamination was isolated on 19 pairs (15.2%) (16 pairs from registrars and 3 pairs from consultants, p=0.04). Coagulase negative staphylococci were the main isolates and contamination was considered low in all cases (1-5 colonies). Contamination was seen more on the dominant hand (16 gloves from dominant hands and 6 from non-dominant hands, p=0.04), on the index finger and thumb. More contaminated gloves were seen in hip arthroplasty procedures (16 pairs from total hip replacements vs 3 pairs from total knee replacements, p=0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: Contamination of glove fingertips during draping in joint replacement procedures is more likely to occur among junior surgeons, in hip rather than knee arthroplasty procedures and on the dominant hand. It is therefore essential that surgeons of different grades replace gloves used in draping to avoid exposing patients to the risk of infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25198974      PMCID: PMC4474194          DOI: 10.1308/003588414X13946184902046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  10 in total

1.  Intraoperative bacterial contamination in operations for joint replacement.

Authors:  N Davis; A Curry; A K Gambhir; H Panigrahi; C R Walker; E G Wilkins; M A Worsley; P R Kay
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1999-09

2.  Glove perforation in orthopaedic and trauma surgery. A comparison between single, double indicator gloving and double gloving with two regular gloves.

Authors:  T Laine; P Aarnio
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-08

3.  Is double-gloving really protective? A comparison between the glove perforation rate among perioperative nurses with single and double gloves during surgery.

Authors:  Yue Ping Guo; Po Ming Wong; Yi Li; Peggy Pui Lai Or
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Exploring the benefits of double gloving during surgery.

Authors:  Denise Korniewicz; Maher El-Masri
Journal:  AORN J       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 0.676

5.  Glove perforation and contamination in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  M Al-Maiyah; A Bajwa; P Mackenney; A Port; P J Gregg; D Hill; P Finn
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-04

6.  Influence of double-gloving on manual dexterity and tactile sensation of surgeons.

Authors:  Donald E Fry; W Edwin Harris; Elizabeth N Kohnke; Carolyn L Twomey
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Contamination of surgeons' glove fingertips during surgical operations.

Authors:  S S Bukhari; R A Harrison; P J Sanderson
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.926

8.  Efficacy of double-gloving as a barrier to microbial contamination during total joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  S F McCue; E W Berg; E A Saunders
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 9.  Double gloving to reduce surgical cross-infection.

Authors:  J Tanner; H Parkinson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-07-19

10.  Surgical glove bacterial contamination and perforation during total hip arthroplasty implantation: when gloves should be changed.

Authors:  J Beldame; B Lagrave; L Lievain; B Lefebvre; N Frebourg; F Dujardin
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 2.256

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  INTRAOPERATIVE EVALUATION AND LEVEL OF CONTAMINATION DURING TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY.

Authors:  Abdulaziz Z Alomar; Saud M Alfayez; Ahmad Binnasser; Fawzi F Aljassir
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 0.683

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.