Literature DB >> 10530856

Intraoperative bacterial contamination in operations for joint replacement.

N Davis1, A Curry, A K Gambhir, H Panigrahi, C R Walker, E G Wilkins, M A Worsley, P R Kay.   

Abstract

All surgical operations have the potential for contamination, and the equipment used can harbour bacteria. We collected samples from 100 elective primary hip and knee arthroplasties. These showed rates of contamination of 11.4% for the sucker tips, 14.5% for light handles, 9.4% for skin blades and 3.2% for the inside blades used during surgery; 28.7% of gloves used for preparation were also contaminated. Of the samples taken from the collection bags used during hip arthroplasty, 20% grew bacteria, which represents a significant microbial reservoir. Also, 17% of theatre gowns were contaminated at the end of the operation. Contamination was found in 10% of the needles used during closure of the fascia. Overall, 76% of the organisms grown were coagulase-negative staphylococcus. A total of 63% of operations showed contamination in the field of operation. Some changes in practice are suggested. Follow-up for a minimum of two years revealed one deep infection but the organism was not identified as a contaminant. These data provide a baseline for studying the bacteriology of the surgery of revision arthroplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10530856     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.81b5.9545

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  45 in total

Review 1.  Calcium Phosphate Bioceramics: A Review of Their History, Structure, Properties, Coating Technologies and Biomedical Applications.

Authors:  Noam Eliaz; Noah Metoki
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 3.623

2.  Higher cefazolin concentrations with intraosseous regional prophylaxis in TKA.

Authors:  Simon W Young; Mei Zhang; Joshua T Freeman; Kelly G Vince; Brendan Coleman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Current concepts in total femoral replacement.

Authors:  Deepak Ramanathan; Marcelo Bp Siqueira; Alison K Klika; Carlos A Higuera; Wael K Barsoum; Michael J Joyce
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-12-18

4.  Supports used for positioning of patients in hip arthroplasty: is there an infection risk?

Authors:  Riaz Ahmad; Ji Tham; Syed Ghufran Ali Naqvi; Umer Butt; John Dixon
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Which regions of the operating gown should be considered most sterile?

Authors:  Jesse E Bible; Debdut Biswas; Peter G Whang; Andrew K Simpson; Jonathan N Grauer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  [Total endoprosthetic replacement of femur, humerus and tibia].

Authors:  U Lenze; C Knebel; F Lenze; S Consalvo; I Lazic; S Breden; H Rechl; R von Eisenhart-Rothe
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  The microbiology of infected hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Imran Rafiq; A K Gambhir; B M Wroblewski; P R Kay
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Outcome following deep wound contamination in cemented arthroplasty.

Authors:  A M Byrne; S Morris; T McCarthy; W Quinlan; J M O'byrne
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-04-04       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  In vitro evaluation of the anti-bacterial effect of two preparations of platelet rich plasma compared with cefazolin and whole blood.

Authors:  Jessica Intravia; Donald A Allen; Thomas Js Durant; Mary Beth R McCarthy; Ryan Russell; Knut Beitzel; Mark P Cote; Feliciano Dias; Augustus D Mazzocca
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2014-05-08

10.  Method of intraoperative tissue sampling for culture has an effect on contamination risk.

Authors:  Antonia F Chen; Meredith Menz; Priscilla K Cavanaugh; Javad Parvizi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.