Literature DB >> 15795210

Glove perforation and contamination in primary total hip arthroplasty.

M Al-Maiyah1, A Bajwa, P Mackenney, A Port, P J Gregg, D Hill, P Finn.   

Abstract

We conducted a randomised, controlled trial to determine whether changing gloves at specified intervals can reduce the incidence of glove perforation and contamination in total hip arthroplasty. A total of 50 patients were included in the study. In the study group (25 patients), gloves were changed at 20-minute intervals or prior to cementation. In the control group (25 patients), gloves were changed prior to cementation. In addition, gloves were changed in both groups whenever there was a visible puncture. Only outer gloves were investigated. Contamination was tested by impression of gloved fingers on blood agar and culture plates were subsequently incubated at 37 degrees C for 48 hours. The number of colonies and types of organisms were recorded. Glove perforation was assessed using the water test. The incidence of perforation and contamination was significantly lower in the study group compared with the control group. Changing gloves at regular intervals is an effective way to decrease the incidence of glove perforation and bacterial contamination during total hip arthroplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15795210     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.87B4.15744

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  19 in total

1.  Which regions of the operating gown should be considered most sterile?

Authors:  Jesse E Bible; Debdut Biswas; Peter G Whang; Andrew K Simpson; Jonathan N Grauer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  A prospective study on the risk of glove fingertip contamination during draping in joint replacement surgery.

Authors:  D Makki; K Deierl; A Pandit; S Trakru
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  CORR Insights®: High Risk of Surgical Glove Perforation From Surgical Rotatory Instruments.

Authors:  Ronald W Lindsey
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Periprosthetic joint infections at a teaching hospital in 1990-2007.

Authors:  Alexandre Renaud; Martin Lavigne; Pascal-André Vendittoli
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.089

5.  Evaluation of two different methods of arch bar application: a comparative prospective study.

Authors:  Naveen Chhabra; Shruti Chhabra; Deepti Thapar
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2014-07-18

6.  Outcome following deep wound contamination in cemented arthroplasty.

Authors:  A M Byrne; S Morris; T McCarthy; W Quinlan; J M O'byrne
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-04-04       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  High Risk of Surgical Glove Perforation From Surgical Rotatory Instruments.

Authors:  Ashton H Goldman; Emanuel Haug; John R Owen; Jennifer S Wayne; Gregory J Golladay
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Primary total knee replacement: is suction a portal of infection?

Authors:  Vijaya M Budnar; Rouin Amirfeyz; Michael Ng; Gordon C Bannister; Ashley W Blom
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  Bacterial migration through punctured surgical gloves under real surgical conditions.

Authors:  Nils-Olaf Hübner; Anna-Maria Goerdt; Natalie Stanislawski; Ojan Assadian; Claus-Dieter Heidecke; Axel Kramer; Lars Ivo Partecke
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 3.090

10.  Reducing surgical site infection in arthroplasty of the lower limb: A multi-disciplinary approach.

Authors:  R Johnson; S S Jameson; R D Sanders; N J Sargant; S D Muller; R M D Meek; M R Reed
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 5.853

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.