Literature DB >> 25197080

Evolution of Drosophila sex comb length illustrates the inextricable interplay between selection and variation.

Juan N Malagón1, Abha Ahuja2, Gabilan Sivapatham3, Julian Hung3, Jiwon Lee3, Sergio A Muñoz-Gómez4, Joel Atallah5, Rama S Singh6, Ellen Larsen1.   

Abstract

In spite of the diversity of possible biological forms observed in nature, a limited range of morphospace is frequently occupied for a given trait. Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain this bias in the distribution of phenotypes including selection, drift, and developmental constraints. Despite extensive work on phenotypic bias, the underlying developmental mechanisms explaining why particular regions of morphological space remain unoccupied are poorly understood. To address this issue, we studied the sex comb, a group of modified bristles used in courtship that shows marked morphological diversity among Drosophila species. In many Drosophila species including Drosophila melanogaster, the sex comb rotates 90° to a vertical position during development. Here we analyze the effect of changing D. melanogaster sex comb length on the process of rotation. We find that artificial selection changes the number of bristles per comb without a proportional change in the space available for rotation. As a result, when increasing sex comb length, rather than displaying a similar straight vertical shape observed in other Drosophila species, long sex combs bend because rotation is blocked by a neighboring row of bristles. Our results show ways in which morphologies that would be favored by natural selection are apparently impossible to achieve developmentally. These findings highlight the potential role of development in modifying selectable variation in the evolution of Drosophila sex comb length.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25197080      PMCID: PMC4191799          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1322342111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  25 in total

1.  How many processes are responsible for phenotypic evolution?

Authors:  G Fusco
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.930

2.  Developmental constraints versus flexibility in morphological evolution.

Authors:  Patricia Beldade; Kees Koops; Paul M Brakefield
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-04-25       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Developmental constraint and natural selection.

Authors:  Wallace Arthur
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.930

Review 4.  The developmental renaissance in adaptationism.

Authors:  Mark E Olson
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  Developmental Genetics of the Posterior Legs in Drosophila Melanogaster.

Authors:  A Hannah-Alava
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1958-09       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Combing evolution.

Authors:  John R True
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.930

7.  Digit loss in archosaur evolution and the interplay between selection and constraints.

Authors:  Merijn A G de Bakker; Donald A Fowler; Kelly den Oude; Esther M Dondorp; M Carmen Garrido Navas; Jaroslaw O Horbanczuk; Jean-Yves Sire; Danuta Szczerbińska; Michael K Richardson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-07-07       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Drosophila sex combs as a model of evolutionary innovations.

Authors:  Artyom Kopp
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.930

Review 9.  Evolution and development of shape: integrating quantitative approaches.

Authors:  Christian Peter Klingenberg
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 53.242

10.  Developmental constraints and convergent evolution in Drosophila sex comb formation.

Authors:  Joel Atallah; Nana Hou Liu; Peter Dennis; Andy Hon; Ellen W Larsen
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.930

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Genes and genomes and unnecessary complexity in precision medicine.

Authors:  Rama S Singh; Bhagwati P Gupta
Journal:  NPJ Genom Med       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 8.617

2.  Sex combs find middle ground in evolution debate.

Authors:  Ehab Abouheif; Ab Matteen Rafiqi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Modular tissue-specific regulation of doublesex underpins sexually dimorphic development in Drosophila.

Authors:  Gavin R Rice; Olga Barmina; David Luecke; Kevin Hu; Michelle Arbeitman; Artyom Kopp
Journal:  Development       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 6.868

4.  Evolution of Ovipositor Length in Drosophila suzukii Is Driven by Enhanced Cell Size Expansion and Anisotropic Tissue Reorganization.

Authors:  Jack E Green; Matthieu Cavey; Emmanuelle Médina Caturegli; Benoit Aigouy; Nicolas Gompel; Benjamin Prud'homme
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Sexual Selection Does Not Increase the Rate of Compensatory Adaptation to a Mutation Influencing a Secondary Sexual Trait in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Christopher H Chandler; Anna Mammel; Ian Dworkin
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 3.154

6.  Evolution of natural lifespan variation and molecular strategies of extended lifespan in yeast.

Authors:  Alaattin Kaya; Cheryl Zi Jin Phua; Mitchell Lee; Lu Wang; Alexander Tyshkovskiy; Siming Ma; Benjamin Barre; Weiqiang Liu; Benjamin R Harrison; Xiaqing Zhao; Xuming Zhou; Brian M Wasko; Theo K Bammler; Daniel El Promislow; Matt Kaeberlein; Vadim N Gladyshev
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Rotation of sex combs in Drosophila melanogaster requires precise and coordinated spatio-temporal dynamics from forces generated by epithelial cells.

Authors:  Ernest C Y Ho; Juan Nicolas Malagón; Abha Ahuja; Rama Singh; Ellen Larsen
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 8.  Genes and genomes and unnecessary complexity in precision medicine.

Authors:  Rama S Singh; Bhagwati P Gupta
Journal:  NPJ Genom Med       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 8.617

9.  Natural selection on sleep duration in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Caetano Souto-Maior; Yazmin L Serrano Negron; Susan T Harbison
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 4.996

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.