Literature DB >> 23016935

Drosophila sex combs as a model of evolutionary innovations.

Artyom Kopp1.   

Abstract

The diversity of animal and plant forms is shaped by nested evolutionary innovations. Understanding the genetic and molecular changes responsible for these innovations is therefore one of the key goals of evolutionary biology. From the genetic point of view, the origin of novel traits implies the origin of new regulatory pathways to control their development. To understand how these new pathways are assembled in the course of evolution, we need model systems that combine relatively recent innovations with a powerful set of genetic and molecular tools. One such model is provided by the Drosophila sex comb-a male-specific morphological structure that evolved in a relatively small lineage related to the model species D. melanogaster. Our extensive knowledge of sex comb development in D. melanogaster provides the basis for investigating the genetic changes responsible for sex comb origin and diversification. At the same time, sex combs can change on microevolutionary timescales and differ spectacularly among closely related species, providing opportunities for direct genetic analysis and for integrating developmental and population-genetic approaches. Sex comb evolution is associated with the origin of novel interactions between Hox and sex determination genes. Activity of the sex determination pathway was brought under the control of the Hox code to become segment-specific, while Hox gene expression became sexually dimorphic. At the same time, both Hox and sex determination genes were integrated into the intrasegmental spatial patterning network, and acquired new joint downstream targets. Phylogenetic analysis shows that similar sex comb morphologies evolved independently in different lineages. Convergent evolution at the phenotypic level reflects convergent changes in the expression of Hox and sex determination genes, involving both independent gains and losses of regulatory interactions. However, the downstream cell-differentiation programs have diverged between species, and in some lineages, similar adult morphologies are produced by different morphogenetic mechanisms. These features make the sex comb an excellent model for examining not only the genetic changes responsible for its evolution, but also the cellular processes that translate DNA sequence changes into morphological diversity. The origin and diversification of sex combs provides insights into the roles of modularity, cooption, and regulatory changes in evolutionary innovations, and can serve as a model for understanding the origin of the more drastic novelties that define higher order taxa.
© 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 23016935      PMCID: PMC3462374          DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2011.00507.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evol Dev        ISSN: 1520-541X            Impact factor:   1.930


  132 in total

1.  Multiple roles for four-jointed in planar polarity and limb patterning.

Authors:  M P Zeidler; N Perrimon; D I Strutt
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 3.582

2.  Control of compartment development by the engrailed gene in Drosophila.

Authors:  G Morata; P A Lawrence
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1975-06-19       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Analysis of the doublesex female protein in Drosophila melanogaster: role on sexual differentiation and behavior and dependence on intersex.

Authors:  J A Waterbury; L L Jackson; P Schedl
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Hedgehog signalling controls eye degeneration in blind cavefish.

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Yamamoto; David W Stock; William R Jeffery
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-10-14       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Bristles induce bracts via the EGFR pathway on Drosophila legs.

Authors:  Lewis I Held
Journal:  Mech Dev       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.882

6.  Developmental constraints and convergent evolution in Drosophila sex comb formation.

Authors:  Joel Atallah; Nana Hou Liu; Peter Dennis; Andy Hon; Ellen W Larsen
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.930

7.  Dual functions of wingless in the Drosophila leg imaginal disc.

Authors:  E L Wilder; N Perrimon
Journal:  Development       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 6.868

8.  dachshund encodes a nuclear protein required for normal eye and leg development in Drosophila.

Authors:  G Mardon; N M Solomon; G M Rubin
Journal:  Development       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 6.868

9.  Recruitment of a hedgehog regulatory circuit in butterfly eyespot evolution.

Authors:  D N Keys; D L Lewis; J E Selegue; B J Pearson; L V Goodrich; R L Johnson; J Gates; M P Scott; S B Carroll
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-01-22       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Generation of multiple antagonistic domains along the proximodistal axis during Drosophila leg development.

Authors:  M Abu-Shaar; R S Mann
Journal:  Development       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 6.868

View more
  27 in total

Review 1.  Dmrt genes in the development and evolution of sexual dimorphism.

Authors:  Artyom Kopp
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 11.639

2.  Sex combs find middle ground in evolution debate.

Authors:  Ehab Abouheif; Ab Matteen Rafiqi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Modular tissue-specific regulation of doublesex underpins sexually dimorphic development in Drosophila.

Authors:  Gavin R Rice; Olga Barmina; David Luecke; Kevin Hu; Michelle Arbeitman; Artyom Kopp
Journal:  Development       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 6.868

4.  Polymorphism and Divergence of Novel Gene Expression Patterns in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Julie M Cridland; Alex C Majane; Hayley K Sheehy; David J Begun
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Pupal development and pigmentation process of a polka-dotted fruit fly, Drosophila guttifera (Insecta, Diptera).

Authors:  Yuichi Fukutomi; Keiji Matsumoto; Kiyokazu Agata; Noriko Funayama; Shigeyuki Koshikawa
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 0.900

6.  Developmental origins of a novel gut morphology in frogs.

Authors:  Stephanie Bloom; Cris Ledon-Rettig; Carlos Infante; Anne Everly; James Hanken; Nanette Nascone-Yoder
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.930

7.  The role of doublesex in the evolution of exaggerated horns in the Japanese rhinoceros beetle.

Authors:  Yuta Ito; Ayane Harigai; Moe Nakata; Tadatsugu Hosoya; Kunio Araya; Yuichi Oba; Akinori Ito; Takahiro Ohde; Toshinobu Yaginuma; Teruyuki Niimi
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 8.807

8.  Male- and female-specific variants of doublesex gene products have different roles to play towards regulation of Sex combs reduced expression and sex comb morphogenesis in Drosophila.

Authors:  Thangjam Ranjita Devi; B V Shyamala
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.826

9.  Evolution of Drosophila sex comb length illustrates the inextricable interplay between selection and variation.

Authors:  Juan N Malagón; Abha Ahuja; Gabilan Sivapatham; Julian Hung; Jiwon Lee; Sergio A Muñoz-Gómez; Joel Atallah; Rama S Singh; Ellen Larsen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  A Distalless-responsive enhancer of the Hox gene Sex combs reduced is required for segment- and sex-specific sensory organ development in Drosophila.

Authors:  Sebnem Ece Eksi; Olga Barmina; Christopher L McCallough; Artyom Kopp; Teresa Vales Orenic
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.