Literature DB >> 11478525

How many processes are responsible for phenotypic evolution?

G Fusco1.   

Abstract

In addressing phenotypic evolution, this article reconsiders natural selection, random drift, developmental constraints, and internal selection in the new extended context of evolutionary developmental biology. The change of perspective from the "evolution of phenotypes" toward an "evolution of ontogenies" (evo-devo perspective) affects the reciprocal relationships among these different processes. Random drift and natural selection are sibling processes: two forms of post-productional sorting among alternative developmental trajectories, the former random, the latter nonrandom. Developmental constraint is a compound concept; it contains even some forms of natural ("external" and "internal") selection. A narrower definition ("reproductive constraints") is proposed. Internal selection is not a selection caused by an internal agent. It is a form of environment-independent selection depending on the level of the organism's internal developmental or functional coordination. Selection and constraints are the main deterministic processes in phenotypic evolution but they are not opposing forces. Indeed, they are continuously interacting processes of evolutionary change, but with different roles that should not be confused.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11478525     DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-142x.2001.003004279.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evol Dev        ISSN: 1520-541X            Impact factor:   1.930


  7 in total

Review 1.  The generation of variation and the developmental basis for evolutionary novelty.

Authors:  Benedikt Hallgrímsson; Heather A Jamniczky; Nathan M Young; Campbell Rolian; Urs Schmidt-Ott; Ralph S Marcucio
Journal:  J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 2.656

2.  Phenotypic plasticity in development and evolution: facts and concepts. Introduction.

Authors:  Giuseppe Fusco; Alessandro Minelli
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Higher-order phylogeny of modern birds (Theropoda, Aves: Neornithes) based on comparative anatomy. II. Analysis and discussion.

Authors:  Bradley C Livezey; Richard L Zusi
Journal:  Zool J Linn Soc       Date:  2007-01-01       Impact factor: 3.286

4.  Evolution of Drosophila sex comb length illustrates the inextricable interplay between selection and variation.

Authors:  Juan N Malagón; Abha Ahuja; Gabilan Sivapatham; Julian Hung; Jiwon Lee; Sergio A Muñoz-Gómez; Joel Atallah; Rama S Singh; Ellen Larsen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Nearly 200 years of sustained selection have not overcome the leaf area-stem size relationship in the poinsettia.

Authors:  Laura Trejo; Julieta A Rosell; Mark E Olson
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 5.183

6.  Are developmental shifts the main driver of phenotypic evolution in Diplodus spp. (Perciformes: Sparidae)?

Authors:  Paolo Colangelo; Daniele Ventura; Paolo Piras; Jacopo Pagani Guazzugli Bonaiuti; Giandomenico Ardizzone
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  Classification of transient behaviours in a time-dependent toggle switch model.

Authors:  Berta Verd; Anton Crombach; Johannes Jaeger
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2014-04-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.