Literature DB >> 25186758

Optimal combination of neural temporal envelope and fine structure cues to explain speech identification in background noise.

Il Joon Moon1, Jong Ho Won2, Min-Hyun Park3, D Timothy Ives4, Kaibao Nie5, Michael G Heinz6, Christian Lorenzi4, Jay T Rubinstein5.   

Abstract

The dichotomy between acoustic temporal envelope (ENV) and fine structure (TFS) cues has stimulated numerous studies over the past decade to understand the relative role of acoustic ENV and TFS in human speech perception. Such acoustic temporal speech cues produce distinct neural discharge patterns at the level of the auditory nerve, yet little is known about the central neural mechanisms underlying the dichotomy in speech perception between neural ENV and TFS cues. We explored the question of how the peripheral auditory system encodes neural ENV and TFS cues in steady or fluctuating background noise, and how the central auditory system combines these forms of neural information for speech identification. We sought to address this question by (1) measuring sentence identification in background noise for human subjects as a function of the degree of available acoustic TFS information and (2) examining the optimal combination of neural ENV and TFS cues to explain human speech perception performance using computational models of the peripheral auditory system and central neural observers. Speech-identification performance by human subjects decreased as the acoustic TFS information was degraded in the speech signals. The model predictions best matched human performance when a greater emphasis was placed on neural ENV coding rather than neural TFS. However, neural TFS cues were necessary to account for the full effect of background-noise modulations on human speech-identification performance.
Copyright © 2014 the authors 0270-6474/14/3412145-10$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  computational model; neural mechanism; speech perception; temporal cues

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25186758      PMCID: PMC4152611          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1025-14.2014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  34 in total

1.  Evaluating auditory performance limits: i. one-parameter discrimination using a computational model for the auditory nerve.

Authors:  M G Heinz; H S Colburn; L H Carney
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.026

2.  An auditory-periphery model of the effects of acoustic trauma on auditory nerve responses.

Authors:  Ian C Bruce; Murray B Sachs; Eric D Young
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  A phenomenological model for the responses of auditory-nerve fibers. II. Nonlinear tuning with a frequency glide.

Authors:  Qing Tan; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The use of confusion patterns to evaluate the neural basis for concurrent vowel identification.

Authors:  Ananthakrishna Chintanpalli; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effects of acoustic trauma on the representation of the vowel "eh" in cat auditory nerve fibers.

Authors:  R L Miller; J R Schilling; K R Franck; E D Young
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Perceptual restoration of missing speech sounds.

Authors:  R M Warren
Journal:  Science       Date:  1970-01-23       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues.

Authors:  R V Shannon; F G Zeng; V Kamath; J Wygonski; M Ekelid
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Speech processing in the auditory system. I: The representation of speech sounds in the responses of the auditory nerve.

Authors:  S A Shamma
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Effects of spectral smearing and temporal fine structure degradation on speech masking release.

Authors:  Dan Gnansia; Vincent Péan; Bernard Meyer; Christian Lorenzi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Ten(HL)-test results and psychophysical tuning curves for subjects with auditory neuropathy.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.117

View more
  13 in total

1.  Auditory midbrain representation of a break in interaural correlation.

Authors:  Qian Wang; Liang Li
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Relative contributions of acoustic temporal fine structure and envelope cues for lexical tone perception in noise.

Authors:  Beier Qi; Yitao Mao; Jiaxing Liu; Bo Liu; Li Xu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Factors Affecting Speech Reception in Background Noise with a Vocoder Implementation of the FAST Algorithm.

Authors:  Shaikat Hossain; Raymond L Goldsworthy
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-05-09

4.  Noise-Sensitive But More Precise Subcortical Representations Coexist with Robust Cortical Encoding of Natural Vocalizations.

Authors:  Samira Souffi; Christian Lorenzi; Léo Varnet; Chloé Huetz; Jean-Marc Edeline
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Understanding degraded speech leads to perceptual gating of a brainstem reflex in human listeners.

Authors:  Heivet Hernández-Pérez; Jason Mikiel-Hunter; David McAlpine; Sumitrajit Dhar; Sriram Boothalingam; Jessica J M Monaghan; Catherine M McMahon
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 8.029

6.  Effects of Physiological Internal Noise on Model Predictions of Concurrent Vowel Identification for Normal-Hearing Listeners.

Authors:  Mark S Hedrick; Il Joon Moon; Jihwan Woo; Jong Ho Won
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Focal versus distributed temporal cortex activity for speech sound category assignment.

Authors:  Sophie Bouton; Valérian Chambon; Rémi Tyrand; Adrian G Guggisberg; Margitta Seeck; Sami Karkar; Dimitri van de Ville; Anne-Lise Giraud
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Distorting temporal fine structure by phase shifting and its effects on speech intelligibility and neural phase locking.

Authors:  Yingyue Xu; Maxin Chen; Petrina LaFaire; Xiaodong Tan; Claus-Peter Richter
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Age Dependence of Thresholds for Speech in Noise in Normal-Hearing Adolescents.

Authors:  Irene Jacobi; Marya Sheikh Rashid; Jan A P M de Laat; Wouter A Dreschler
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2017 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

10.  A mechanoelectrical mechanism for detection of sound envelopes in the hearing organ.

Authors:  Alfred L Nuttall; Anthony J Ricci; George Burwood; James M Harte; Stefan Stenfelt; Per Cayé-Thomasen; Tianying Ren; Sripriya Ramamoorthy; Yuan Zhang; Teresa Wilson; Thomas Lunner; Brian C J Moore; Anders Fridberger
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.