Literature DB >> 25182181

What women want from women's reproductive health research: a qualitative study.

Shilpi Pandey1, Maureen Porter2, Siladitya Bhattacharya3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Researchers are being urged to involve patients in the design and conduct of studies in health care with limited insight at present into their needs, abilities or interests. This is particularly true in the field of reproductive health care where many conditions such as pregnancy, menopause and fertility problems involve women who are otherwise healthy.
OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the feasibility of involving patients and members of the public in research on women's reproductive health care (WRH).
SETTING: University and tertiary care hospital in north-east Scotland; 37 women aged 18-57.
METHOD: Four focus groups and one individual interview were audio-recorded and verbatim transcripts analysed thematically by two researchers using a grounded theory approach. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Most participants were interested in WRH, but some participated to promote a health issue of special concern to them. Priorities for research reflected women's personal concerns: endometriosis, polycystic ovary syndrome, menopause, fertility risks of delaying parenthood and early post-natal discharge from hospital. Women were initially enthusiastic about getting involved in research on WRH at the design or delivery stage, but after discussion in focus groups, some questioned their ability to do so or the time available to commit to research. None of the respondents expected payment for any involvement, believing that the experience would be rewarding enough in itself.
CONCLUSIONS: Involving patients and public in research would include different perspectives and priorities; however, recruiting for this purpose would be challenging.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  focus group; public involvement; women's health research

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25182181      PMCID: PMC5810697          DOI: 10.1111/hex.12233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Expect        ISSN: 1369-6513            Impact factor:   3.377


  20 in total

1.  Suggestions in maternal and child health for the National Technology Assessment Programme: a consideration of consumer and professional priorities.

Authors:  R Johanson; C Rigby; M Newburn; M Stewart; P Jones
Journal:  J R Soc Promot Health       Date:  2002-03

Review 2.  Consumer involvement in health research: a review and research agenda.

Authors:  Jonathan Boote; Rosemary Telford; Cindy Cooper
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 3.  Involving consumers in research and development agenda setting for the NHS: developing an evidence-based approach.

Authors:  S Oliver; L Clarke-Jones; R Rees; R Milne; P Buchanan; J Gabbay; G Gyte; A Oakley; K Stein
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.014

4.  Patients and professionals as research partners: challenges, practicalities, and benefits.

Authors:  Sarah Hewlett; Maarten de Wit; Pam Richards; Enid Quest; Rod Hughes; Turid Heiberg; John Kirwan
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2006-08-15

5.  Consumer involvement in setting the health services research agenda: persistent questions of value.

Authors:  Vikki Entwistle; Michael Calnan; Paul Dieppe
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  2008-10

Review 6.  Lay perspectives: advantages for health research.

Authors:  V A Entwistle; M J Renfrew; S Yearley; J Forrester; T Lamont
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-02-07

7.  Patients' priorities concerning health research: the case of asthma and COPD research in the Netherlands.

Authors:  J Francisca Caron-Flinterman; Jacqueline E W Broerse; Julia Teerling; Joske F G Bunders
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  What do I want from health research and researchers when I am a patient?

Authors:  I Chalmers
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-05-20

Review 9.  Lay participation in health care decision making: a conceptual framework.

Authors:  C Charles; S DeMaio
Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.265

10.  Patients' priorities for health research: focus group study of patients with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Allison Tong; Peter Sainsbury; Stacy M Carter; Bronwyn Hall; David C Harris; Rowan G Walker; Carmel M Hawley; Steven Chadban; Jonathan C Craig
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 5.992

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.