Literature DB >> 8120350

Lay participation in health care decision making: a conceptual framework.

C Charles1, S DeMaio.   

Abstract

Lay participation in health care decision making has attracted increasing interest in Canada, with numerous provincial government reports advocating this initiative. Interest stems from a number of factors. Among them is a growing recognition that patient preferences ought to be incorporated into decision making that involves individual treatment choices. Another factor is the desire to increase public accountability for decisions on the allocation of health care resources, in order to make providers more accountable to the communities they serve. There is, however, still considerable confusion over what lay participation really means. In addition, little consideration has been given to whether and how lay participation can lead to better decision making and the criteria by which it should be judged. This article presents a framework based on decision-making domains, role perspectives, and levels of participation and is intended as an initial step toward providing greater conceptual clarity regarding the key dimensions and goals of lay participation in health care decision making.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8120350     DOI: 10.1215/03616878-18-4-881

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law        ISSN: 0361-6878            Impact factor:   2.265


  74 in total

Review 1.  Healthcare rationing-are additional criteria needed for assessing evidence based clinical practice guidelines?

Authors:  O F Norheim
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-11-27

2.  Editorial: special conference issue.

Authors:  Cathy Charles; Amiram Gafni; Tim Whelan
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Regulated competition and citizen participation: lessons from Israel.

Authors:  David Chinitz
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  A systemic and value-based approach to strategic reform of the mental health system.

Authors:  M McCubbin; D Cohen
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  1999

Review 5.  Prostate cancer: 13. Whose prostate is it anyway? The view from the other side of the examining table.

Authors:  R E Gray; A Philbrook
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-03-23       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Clients or citizens? Some considerations for primary care organisations.

Authors:  Peter G Cawston; Rosaline S Barbour
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 7.  Patient compliance, client participation and lay reskilling: a review of some sociological work on lay participation in health care decision making.

Authors:  S D Short
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  1996-05

8.  Are elected health boards an effective mechanism for public participation in health service governance?

Authors:  Robin Gauld
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Do people want to be autonomous patients? Preferred roles in treatment decision-making in several patient populations.

Authors:  Raisa B Deber; Nancy Kraetschmer; Sara Urowitz; Natasha Sharpe
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  Community involvement in developing policies for genetic testing: assessing the interests and experiences of individuals affected by genetic conditions.

Authors:  Sarah E Gollust; Kira Apse; Barbara P Fuller; Paul Steven Miller; Barbara B Biesecker
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.