Literature DB >> 18806196

Consumer involvement in setting the health services research agenda: persistent questions of value.

Vikki Entwistle1, Michael Calnan, Paul Dieppe.   

Abstract

Interest in consumer involvement in health services research started to gain momentum at around the same time that the MRC Health Services Research Collaboration (HSRC) was established. Consumer involvement was not the focus of a formal research programme within the HSRC, but HSRC members took opportunities to conduct three projects relating to consumer involvement in research agenda-setting activities. These were: (1) a comparison of the focus of published research relating to the management of osteoarthritis of the knee with clinicians' and patients' ideas about research priorities; (2) a survey that examined the consumer involvement policies of public- and voluntary-sector organizations that fund health services research in the UK; and (3) a citizens' jury that was convened to develop priorities for research relating to primary health and social care in the Bristol area. This paper reviews the findings of these projects and highlights the continued need for attention to underlying values in the development and evaluation of future efforts to involve consumers in research agenda setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18806196     DOI: 10.1258/jhsrp.2008.007167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy        ISSN: 1355-8196


  15 in total

1.  Patient participation as dialogue: setting research agendas.

Authors:  Tineke A Abma; Jacqueline E W Broerse
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 2.  Consumer participation and organizational development in health care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Clemens B Tempfer; Peter Nowak
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 1.704

3.  A CTSA agenda to advance methods for comparative effectiveness research.

Authors:  Mark Helfand; Sean Tunis; Evelyn P Whitlock; Stephen G Pauker; Anirban Basu; Jon Chilingerian; Frank E Harrell; David O Meltzer; Victor M Montori; Donald S Shepard; David M Kent
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.689

4.  What women want from women's reproductive health research: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Shilpi Pandey; Maureen Porter; Siladitya Bhattacharya
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Community-based knowledge transfer and exchange: helping community-based organizations link research to action.

Authors:  Michael G Wilson; John N Lavis; Robb Travers; Sean B Rourke
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 7.327

6.  Including the public in pandemic planning: a deliberative approach.

Authors:  Annette J Braunack-Mayer; Jackie M Street; Wendy A Rogers; Rodney Givney; John R Moss; Janet E Hiller
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Prioritizing research needs based on a systematic evidence review: a pilot process for engaging stakeholders.

Authors:  Rachel Gold; Evelyn P Whitlock; Carrie D Patnode; Paul S McGinnis; David I Buckley; Cynthia Morris
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Disinvestment policy and the public funding of assisted reproductive technologies: outcomes of deliberative engagements with three key stakeholder groups.

Authors:  Katherine Hodgetts; Janet E Hiller; Jackie M Street; Drew Carter; Annette J Braunack-Mayer; Amber M Watt; John R Moss; Adam G Elshaug
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  How are European birth-cohort studies engaging and consulting with young cohort members?

Authors:  Patricia J Lucas; Debra Allnock; Tricia Jessiman
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Does funded research reflect the priorities of people living with type 1 diabetes? A secondary analysis of research questions.

Authors:  Kate Boddy; Katherine Cowan; Andy Gibson; Nicky Britten
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.