Literature DB >> 25181432

Force characterization of intracranial endovascular embolization: coil type, microcatheter placement, and insertion rate.

Jonathan B Lamano1, Grace G Bushnell, Hongyu Chen, Avanti Badrinathan, Najib E El Tecle, Bernard R Bendok, Matthew R Glucksberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative rupture (IOR) is a rare, but potentially morbid complication of endovascular aneurysm coil embolization. Yet, IOR predictors have remained relatively uninvestigated in relation to coil design.
OBJECTIVE: To develop a novel in vitro aneurysm model to characterize forces exerted by coils of different design on the aneurysm during endovascular embolization that are hypothesized to contribute to IOR.
METHODS: A 3-mm saccular aneurysm model was developed with flat latex membrane at the dome apex. Membrane deflection was observed throughout simulated embolization and converted to force measurement. Simultaneous coil insertion and force measurement were accomplished with a compression strength-testing machine. Membrane and insertion forces across coil type, microcatheter tip placement, and insertion rate were evaluated.
RESULTS: Insertion force and force directly on the aneurysm wall exhibited a difference, with framing coils exerting greatest force, followed by filling and finishing coils. Regarding microcatheter placement, a similar graded response in membrane and insertion forces was observed with positioning in the top-third of the aneurysm generating the greatest force compared with central and bottom-third placement. Insertion rate was also a factor with the slowest rate (10 mm/min) exhibiting the greatest membrane force, followed by lower forces at 30 and 50 mm/min. A multiple linear regression model was created to assess the contributions of each factor toward aneurysm forces.
CONCLUSION: Increased force on the aneurysm is associated with framing coil use, microcatheter placement proximal to aneurysm dome, and slow insertion rate. Further characterization remains necessary to reduce IOR risk, especially concerning the contributions of insertion rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25181432      PMCID: PMC4237704          DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000525

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  14 in total

1.  The mechanism of catheter kickback in the final stage of coil embolization for aneurysms: the straightening phenomenon.

Authors:  S Miyachi; T Izumi; N Matsubara; T Naito; K-I Haraguchi; T Wakabayashi
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 1.610

Review 2.  Coils in a nutshell: a review of coil physical properties.

Authors:  J B White; C G M Ken; H J Cloft; D F Kallmes
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Outcomes after aneurysm rupture during endovascular coil embolization.

Authors:  R P Tummala; R M Chu; M T Madison; M Myers; D Tubman; E S Nussbaum
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  Controlled pressure-volume factors in the enlargement of intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  G M Austin; W Schievink; R Williams
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 5.  Aneurysmal rupture during coiling: low incidence and good outcomes at a single large volume center.

Authors:  Jonathan L Brisman; Yasunari Niimi; Joon K Song; Alejandro Berenstein
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 6.  Cerebral aneurysm perforations complicating therapy with Guglielmi detachable coils: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Harry J Cloft; David F Kallmes
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Prevention and management of intraprocedural rupture of intracranial aneurysm with detachable coils during embolization.

Authors:  Ming-Hua Li; Bu-Lang Gao; Chun Fang; Ying-Sheng Cheng; Yong-Dong Li; Jue Wang; Guo-Ping Xu
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2006-09-27       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  Procedure-related haemorrhage in embolisation of intracranial aneurysms with Guglielmi detachable coils.

Authors:  B J Kwon; M H Han; C W Oh; K H Kim; K H Chang
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2003-07-08       Impact factor: 2.804

9.  A novel pressure sensor with an optical system for coil embolization of intracranial aneurysms. Laboratory investigation.

Authors:  Noriaki Matsubara; Shigeru Miyachi; Yoshitaka Nagano; Tomotaka Ohshima; Osamu Hososhima; Takashi Izumi; Arihito Tsurumi; Toshihiko Wakabayashi; Masamichi Sakaguchi; Akihito Sano; Hideo Fujimoto
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.115

10.  Predictors and outcomes of intraprocedural rupture in patients treated for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: the CARAT study.

Authors:  Lucas Elijovich; Randall T Higashida; Michael T Lawton; Gary Duckwiler; Steven Giannotta; S Claiborne Johnston
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 7.914

View more
  2 in total

1.  Evaluation of the characteristics of various types of finishing coils for the embolization of intracranial aneurysms in an experimental model with radiolucent coils.

Authors:  Keisuke Ota; Noriaki Matsubara; Shigeru Miyachi; Takashi Izumi; Masashi Ito; Takumi Asai; Takashi Yamanouchi; Toshihiko Wakabayashi
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 1.610

2.  3D Printing of Intracranial Aneurysms Using Fused Deposition Modeling Offers Highly Accurate Replications.

Authors:  A M J Frölich; J Spallek; L Brehmer; J-H Buhk; D Krause; J Fiehler; A Kemmling
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 3.825

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.