Literature DB >> 18417605

Coils in a nutshell: a review of coil physical properties.

J B White1, C G M Ken, H J Cloft, D F Kallmes.   

Abstract

Since its inception, endovascular coil technology has grown substantially as multiple manufacturers entered the market with an ever-increasing number of new products. Practitioners are now inundated with a choice of coils that vary on the basis of factors such as size, composition, stiffness, and detachment mechanism. The seasoned interventionalist had the benefit of evolving with this technology and, therefore, is likely to understand many of the practical nuances of coil development; for more junior practitioners, who did not experience the ongoing changes in technology, this review will provide a basic framework for the fundamentals of coil design.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18417605      PMCID: PMC8119172          DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  7 in total

1.  Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with matrix coils: immediate posttreatment results, clinical outcome and follow-up.

Authors:  T Jonas Kimchi; R A Willinsky; J Spears; S K Lee; K ter Brugge
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Dense packing of cerebral aneurysms: an in vitro study with detachable platinum coils.

Authors:  M Piotin; S Mandai; K J Murphy; K Sugiu; P Gailloud; J B Martin; D A Rüfenacht
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Endovascular occlusion of intracranial aneurysms with Guglielmi detachable coils: correlation between coil packing density and coil compaction.

Authors:  Y Kawanabe; A Sadato; W Taki; N Hashimoto
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.216

4.  Comparison of 2D and 3D digital subtraction angiography in evaluation of intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  Takeshi Sugahara; Yukunori Korogi; Kouji Nakashima; Satoshi Hamatake; Shin Honda; Mutsumasa Takahashi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Ellipsoid approximation versus 3D rotational angiography in the volumetric assessment of intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  M Piotin; B Daghman; C Mounayer; L Spelle; J Moret
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Relation between aneurysm volume, packing, and compaction in 145 cerebral aneurysms treated with coils.

Authors:  Menno Sluzewski; Willem Jan van Rooij; Marian J Slob; Javier Oliván Bescós; Cornelis H Slump; Douwe Wijnalda
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-04-29       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Aneurysm packing with HydroCoil Embolic System versus platinum coils: initial clinical experience.

Authors:  Harry J Cloft; David F Kallmes
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.825

  7 in total
  21 in total

1.  Neurological Changes with Abnormal Brain Reactivity Following Coiling of Cerebral Aneurysm. Possible Reactivity to Endovascular Devices and Material?

Authors:  Sanjeet S Grewal; Eric M López Del Valle; Vivek Gupta; Navarro Ramon; W David Freeman; Rabih G Tawk
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Neurol       Date:  2015-07

2.  How do coil configuration and packing density influence intra-aneurysmal hemodynamics?

Authors:  H G Morales; M Kim; E E Vivas; M-C Villa-Uriol; I Larrabide; T Sola; L Guimaraens; A F Frangi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Softness of endovascular coils.

Authors:  L-D Jou
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 4.  Advances in Biomaterials and Technologies for Vascular Embolization.

Authors:  Jingjie Hu; Hassan Albadawi; Brian W Chong; Amy R Deipolyi; Rahul A Sheth; Ali Khademhosseini; Rahmi Oklu
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 30.849

5.  Evaluation of the characteristics of various types of finishing coils for the embolization of intracranial aneurysms in an experimental model with radiolucent coils.

Authors:  Keisuke Ota; Noriaki Matsubara; Shigeru Miyachi; Takashi Izumi; Masashi Ito; Takumi Asai; Takashi Yamanouchi; Toshihiko Wakabayashi
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 1.610

6.  Evaluation of the characteristics of various types of coils for the embolization of intracranial aneurysms with an optical pressure sensor system.

Authors:  Noriaki Matsubara; Shigeru Miyachi; Yoshitaka Nagano; Tomotaka Ohshima; Osamu Hososhima; Takashi Izumi; Arihito Tsurumi; Toshihiko Wakabayashi; Akihito Sano; Hideo Fujimoto
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  In vitro study of near-wall flow in a cerebral aneurysm model with and without coils.

Authors:  L Goubergrits; B Thamsen; A Berthe; J Poethke; U Kertzscher; K Affeld; C Petz; H-C Hege; H Hoch; A Spuler
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Force characterization of intracranial endovascular embolization: coil type, microcatheter placement, and insertion rate.

Authors:  Jonathan B Lamano; Grace G Bushnell; Hongyu Chen; Avanti Badrinathan; Najib E El Tecle; Bernard R Bendok; Matthew R Glucksberg
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.654

9.  Use of a new soft and long coil reduces the number of coils to embolize a small aneurysm.

Authors:  Akiyo Sadato; Motoharu Hayakawa; Kazuhide Adachi; Yoko Kato; Yuichi Hirose
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 1.610

10.  Computational study for the effects of coil configuration on blood flow characteristics in coil-embolized cerebral aneurysm.

Authors:  Tomohiro Otani; Satoshi Ii; Tomoyoshi Shigematsu; Toshiyuki Fujinaka; Masayuki Hirata; Tomohiko Ozaki; Shigeo Wada
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 2.602

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.