Literature DB >> 18323484

Predictors and outcomes of intraprocedural rupture in patients treated for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: the CARAT study.

Lucas Elijovich1, Randall T Higashida, Michael T Lawton, Gary Duckwiler, Steven Giannotta, S Claiborne Johnston.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Intraprocedural rupture (IPR) is a well known complication of intracranial aneurysm treatment. Risks and predictors of IPR and its impact on outcome have not been clearly established.
METHODS: Potential predictors of IPR were evaluated in patients treated in the Cerebral Aneurysm Rerupture After Treatment (CARAT) study using multivariate logistic regression with stepwise elimination stratified by treatment modality. Periprocedural death or disability was defined as death or a change of >or=2 points on the Modified Rankin Scale at discharge compared to before treatment.
RESULTS: IPR occurred in 14.6% of 1010 patients (299 coiled, 711 clipped): 19% with clipping and 5% with coiling (P<0.001). Among those clipped, 31% with IPR had periprocedural death or disability compared to 18% without IPR (P=0.001); among those coiled, 63% with IPR had periprocedural death or disability compared to 15% without IPR (P<0.001). Overall, coronary artery disease and initial lower Hunt and Hess Grade were independent predictors of IPR. For those undergoing coiling, independent predictors of IPR were Asian race, black race, COPD, and lower initial Hunt and Hess Grade. Among those undergoing clipping, hyperlipidemia and lower initial Hunt and Hess Grade were both independent predictors of IPR.
CONCLUSIONS: IPR was common in patients undergoing treatment of ruptured aneurysms, particularly with surgical clipping. The frequency of IPR with new disability was similar in the surgical and endovascular treatment groups. Coronary artery disease, hyperlipidemia, race, COPD, and lower Hunt and Hess Grade were associated with greater risk of IPR, which may reflect differences in vessel fragility but requires further confirmation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18323484     DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.504670

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  40 in total

1.  In-hospital mortality and poor outcome after surgical clipping and endovascular coiling for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage using nationwide databases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fusao Ikawa; Nobuaki Michihata; Toshinori Matsushige; Masaru Abiko; Daizo Ishii; Jumpei Oshita; Takahito Okazaki; Shigeyuki Sakamoto; Ryota Kurogi; Koji Iihara; Kunihiro Nishimura; Akio Morita; Kiyohide Fushimi; Hideo Yasunaga; Kaoru Kurisu
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Stent-assisted coil embolization of intracranial aneurysms using the Solitaire™ AB Neurovascular Remodeling Device: initial and midterm follow-up results.

Authors:  Christin Clajus; Vojtech Sychra; Christoph Strasilla; Joachim Klisch
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Force characterization of intracranial endovascular embolization: coil type, microcatheter placement, and insertion rate.

Authors:  Jonathan B Lamano; Grace G Bushnell; Hongyu Chen; Avanti Badrinathan; Najib E El Tecle; Bernard R Bendok; Matthew R Glucksberg
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  Effect of metal artifact reduction software on image quality of C-arm cone-beam computed tomography during intracranial aneurysm treatment.

Authors:  Yukiko Enomoto; Keita Yamauchi; Takahiko Asano; Katharina Otani; Toru Iwama
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 1.610

Review 5.  Complications of endovascular treatment for intracranial aneurysms: Management and prevention.

Authors:  Yon Kwon Ihn; Shang Hun Shin; Seung Kug Baik; In Sup Choi
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 1.610

Review 6.  [Management of anesthesia in endovascular interventions].

Authors:  T Rössel; R Paul; T Richter; S Ludwig; T Hofmockel; A R Heller; T Koch
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.041

7.  Perioperative use of recombinant factor VII to prevent intraoperative aneurysm rupture in high risk patients: a preliminary safety evaluation.

Authors:  Eric S Nussbaum; Tariq M Janjua; Archie Defillo; Penny Sinner; Andrea Zelensky
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2008-09-26       Impact factor: 3.210

8.  Safety of stent-assisted coiling for the treatment of wide-necked ruptured aneurysm: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of prevalence.

Authors:  Shadi Bsat; Ayman Bsat; Hani Tamim; Hani Chanbour; Safwan Omar Alomari; Mohamad Nabih El Houshiemy; Charbel Moussalem; Ibrahim Omeis
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-08-02       Impact factor: 1.610

9.  Computerized Angiographic Occlusion Rating for Ruptured Clipped Aneurysms is Superior to Subjective Occlusion Rating.

Authors:  A R Al-Schameri; G Baltsavias; P Winkler; M Lunzer; M Kral; L Machegger; F Weymayr; S Emich; C Sherif; B Richling
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 10.  [Endovascular interventions in neuroradiology : New aspects].

Authors:  A Berlis
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.041

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.