Literature DB >> 25177631

Comparison of intrusion effects on maxillary incisors among mini implant anchorage, j-hook headgear and utility arch.

Ravindra Kumar Jain1, Sridhar Prem Kumar2, W S Manjula3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intrusion of maxillary incisors is one of the most important and difficult tooth movements to achieve as a part of orthodontic therapy. A variety of techniques were used in the past to intrude the maxillary incisors before the emergence of mini implants in Orthodontics. Mini implants are temporary anchorage devices used to produce various tooth movements. The research was carried out to evaluate and compare the efficiency of producing intrusion of maxillary incisors using mini implants, utility arch and j- hook headgear.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted on 30 subjects divided into 3 Groups equally. Group 1- mini implant anchorage, Group 2 - j- hooks headgear and Group 3- utility arch were used for intrusion of the maxillary incisors. Conventional lateral cephalograms were taken before treatment and at the end of intrusion. Five cephalometric parameters were used to measure the amount of intrusion attained in each Group. Intra Group comparisons were done using student t-test and inter Group comparisons were done using ANOVA The duration of intrusion was four months in all the three Groups.
RESULTS: In Group 1 the mean average intrusion attained was 2.1 mm, the mean average intrusion attained in Group 2 was 0.7 mm, and the mean average intrusion achieved in Group 3 was 1.4 mm with a side effect of 0.75 mm of molar extrusion.
CONCLUSION: Although, both mini implants and utility arch can be used to attain significant amounts of incisor intrusion but using mini implants will produce true intrusion without any other side effects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Incisor intrusion; J-hook headgear; Mini implants; Utility arch

Year:  2014        PMID: 25177631      PMCID: PMC4149137          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/8339.4554

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  10 in total

1.  A mini-implant for orthodontic anchorage in a deep overbite case.

Authors:  Hidetake Ohnishi; Takakazu Yagi; Yoshitaka Yasuda; Kenji Takada
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  A clinical evaluation of orthodontic mini-implants as intraoral anchorage for the intrusion of maxillary anterior teeth.

Authors:  Ruchi Saxena; Priyanka Sethi Kumar; Madhur Upadhyay; Vijay Naik
Journal:  World J Orthod       Date:  2010

3.  Mini-implants for en masse intrusion of maxillary anterior teeth in a severe Class II division 2 malocclusion.

Authors:  Madhur Upadhyay; K Nagaraj; Sumit Yadav; Ruchi Saxena
Journal:  J Orthod       Date:  2008-06

4.  Miniscrews for upper incisor intrusion.

Authors:  Omur Polat-Ozsoy; Ayca Arman-Ozcirpici; Firdevs Veziroglu
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Segmented approach to simultaneous intrusion and space closure: biomechanics of the three-piece base arch appliance.

Authors:  B Shroff; S J Lindauer; C J Burstone; J B Leiss
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  Mini-implant for orthodontic anchorage.

Authors:  R Kanomi
Journal:  J Clin Orthod       Date:  1997-11

Review 7.  Correction of deep overbite in adults.

Authors:  R Nanda
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  1997-01

8.  Deep overbite correction by intrusion.

Authors:  C R Burstone
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1977-07

9.  Comparison of the intrusion effects on the maxillary incisors between implant anchorage and J-hook headgear.

Authors:  Toru Deguchi; Takashi Murakami; Shingo Kuroda; Toshinori Yabuuchi; Hiroshi Kamioka; Teruko Takano-Yamamoto
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.650

10.  Temporomandibular disorders and psychological status in adult patients with a deep bite.

Authors:  Liselotte Sonnesen; Peter Svensson
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 3.075

  10 in total
  8 in total

1.  Effectiveness of miniscrew-supported maxillary incisor intrusion in deep-bite correction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rami Sosly; Hisham Mohammed; Mumen Z Rizk; Eias Jamous; Ahmad G Qaisi; David R Bearn
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Correlation between chronological age and skeletal age using cvmi and modified MP3 methods.

Authors:  Reshma Mohan; Ravindra Kumar Jain; Nivethigaa Balakrishnan
Journal:  Bioinformation       Date:  2020-12-31

3.  Palatal plane inclination on vertical growth pattern among Indians.

Authors:  Seerab Husain; Arvind Sivakumar; Sri Rengalakshmi
Journal:  Bioinformation       Date:  2021-12-31

4.  Maxillary Incisor Intrusion Using Mini-Implants and Conventional Intrusion Arch: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Prateek Shakti; Abhinav Singh; Abhishek Purohit; Nidhi Shah
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2022-06

5.  Bacteremia after Orthodontic Miniscrew Insertion.

Authors:  Masood Feizbakhsh; Pedram Daneshkazemi; Sina Mobasherizade; Niloofar Fallah
Journal:  Front Dent       Date:  2022-02-02

Review 6.  Effectiveness of Orthodontic Mini-Screw Implants in Adult Deep Bite Patients during Incisor Intrusion: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ahmed Ibrahim Atalla; Mai Hamdy AboulFotouh; Fady Hussein Fahim; Manal Yehia Foda
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2019 Apr-Jun

Review 7.  Orthodontic Intrusion Using Temporary Anchorage Devices Compared to Other Orthodontic Intrusion Methods: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Basma AlMaghlouth; Aqilah AlMubarak; Ibrahim Almaghlouth; Reem AlKhalifah; Amal Alsadah; Ali Hassan
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2021-01-11

Review 8.  A Mini-review on the Effect of Mini-implants on Contemporary Orthodontic Science.

Authors:  Saeid Nosouhian; Mansour Rismanchian; Roya Sabzian; Elham Shadmehr; Hamid Badrian; Amin Davoudi
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2015
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.