Literature DB >> 21491000

A clinical evaluation of orthodontic mini-implants as intraoral anchorage for the intrusion of maxillary anterior teeth.

Ruchi Saxena1, Priyanka Sethi Kumar, Madhur Upadhyay, Vijay Naik.   

Abstract

AIM: To determine the efficacy of mini-implants as intraoral anchorage during en masse intrusion of the six maxillary anterior teeth.
METHODS: Ten patients from the Department of Orthodontics, KLE University, Belgaum, India, who required intrusion of their anterior teeth were selected for this study. After initial alignment and leveling, the maxillary arch was divided into one anterior segment and two posterior segments. A 0.021 3 0.025-inch stainless steel wire was placed in all three segments. In all patients, one mini-implant was placed bilaterally between the lateral incisor and canine. An elastic chain was used to deliver an intrusive force of 45 cN; it was supplemented by a distal force of about 20 cN per side. Patient records were taken at the beginning and end of intrusion.
RESULTS: The amount of intrusion was statistically and clinically significant. The canines were more intruded (3.5 ± 0.9 mm) than the incisors (2.9 ± 1.0 mm). The axial inclination of the incisors did not significantly change. The average duration to accomplish this intrusion was 4.0 ± 1.5 months, with a mean rate of 0.9 mm per month for the canines and 0.7 mm per month for the incisors.
CONCLUSION: Mini-implants are an efficient and stable source of anchorage for the en masse intrusion of the six maxillary anterior teeth.
© 2010 BY QUINTESSENCE PUBLISHING CO, INC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21491000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Orthod        ISSN: 1530-5678


  8 in total

1.  Force changes associated with different intrusion strategies for deep-bite correction by clear aligners.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Wei Hu
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Comparison of intrusion effects on maxillary incisors among mini implant anchorage, j-hook headgear and utility arch.

Authors:  Ravindra Kumar Jain; Sridhar Prem Kumar; W S Manjula
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-07-20

3.  Effects of mandibular incisor intrusion obtained using a conventional utility arch vs bone anchorage.

Authors:  Esen Aydoğdu; Ömür Polat Özsoy
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Comparison of two treatment protocols for intrusion and retraction of maxillary anterior teeth using mini-implants : A prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  A Sumathi Felicita; Shabeena Abdul Khader
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 1.938

5.  Maxillary Incisor Intrusion Using Mini-Implants and Conventional Intrusion Arch: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Prateek Shakti; Abhinav Singh; Abhishek Purohit; Nidhi Shah
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2022-06

6.  Predictive Factors Affecting the Maxillary Alveolar Bone Thickness: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study.

Authors:  Amal Linjawi
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2020-09-15

7.  Three-dimensional evaluation of maxillary anterior alveolar bone for optimal placement of miniscrew implants.

Authors:  Jin Hwan Choi; Hyung Seog Yu; Kee Joon Lee; Young Chel Park
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 1.372

8.  Role of anatomical sites and correlated risk factors on the survival of orthodontic miniscrew implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hisham Mohammed; Khaled Wafaie; Mumen Z Rizk; Mohammed Almuzian; Rami Sosly; David R Bearn
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 2.750

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.