Literature DB >> 18456138

Comparison of the intrusion effects on the maxillary incisors between implant anchorage and J-hook headgear.

Toru Deguchi1, Takashi Murakami, Shingo Kuroda, Toshinori Yabuuchi, Hiroshi Kamioka, Teruko Takano-Yamamoto.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Recently, miniscrews have been used to provide anchorage during orthodontic treatment, especially for incisor intrusion. Miniscrews during incisor intrusion are commonly used in implant orthodontics. Traditionally, effective incisor intrusion has been accomplished with J-hook headgear. In this study, we compared the effect of incisor intrusion, force vector, and amount of root resorption between implant orthodontics and J-hook headgear.
METHODS: Lateral cephalometric radiographs from 8 patients in the implant group and 10 patients in the J-hook headgear group were analyzed for incisor retraction. The estimated force vector was analyzed in the horizontal and vertical directions in both groups. Root resorption was also measured on periapical radiographs.
RESULTS: In the implant group, significant reductions in overjet, overbite, maxillary incisor to palatal plane, and maxillary incisor to upper lip were observed after intrusion of the incisors. In the J-hook headgear group, significant reductions in overjet, overbite, maxillary incisor to upper lip, and maxillary incisor to SN plane were observed after intrusion of the incisors. There were significantly greater reductions in overbite, maxillary incisor to palatal plane, and maxillary incisor to upper lip in the implant group than in the J-hook headgear group. Estimated force analysis resulted in significantly more force in the vertical direction and less in the horizontal direction in the implant group. Furthermore, significantly less root resorption was observed in the implant group compared with the J-hook headgear group.
CONCLUSIONS: The maxillary incisors were effectively intruded by using miniscrews as orthodontic anchorage without patient cooperation. The amount of root resorption was not affected by activating the ligature wire from the miniscrew during incisor intrusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18456138     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.04.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  13 in total

1.  Apical root resorption in maxillary incisors when employing micro-implant and J-hook headgear anchorage: a 4-month radiographic study.

Authors:  Qingzhu Wang; Wenjing Chen; Roger J Smales; Hui Peng; Xiaokun Hu; Lu Yin
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2012-10-18

2.  Comparison of intrusion effects on maxillary incisors among mini implant anchorage, j-hook headgear and utility arch.

Authors:  Ravindra Kumar Jain; Sridhar Prem Kumar; W S Manjula
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-07-20

3.  Zygomatic mini-implant for Class II correction in growing patients.

Authors:  M M El-Dawlatly; A M Abou-El-Ezz; F A El-Sharaby; Y A Mostafa
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  Effectiveness of miniscrew-supported maxillary incisor intrusion in deep-bite correction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rami Sosly; Hisham Mohammed; Mumen Z Rizk; Eias Jamous; Ahmad G Qaisi; David R Bearn
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 5.  Reinforcement of anchorage during orthodontic brace treatment with implants or other surgical methods.

Authors:  Safa Jambi; Tanya Walsh; Jonathan Sandler; Philip E Benson; Richard M Skeggs; Kevin D O'Brien
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-08-19

6.  A comparative study of different intrusion methods and their effect on maxillary incisors.

Authors:  Prachi Goel; Ragni Tandon; Kaushal Kishor Agrawal
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2014-12-06

7.  Maxillary Incisor Intrusion Using Mini-Implants and Conventional Intrusion Arch: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Prateek Shakti; Abhinav Singh; Abhishek Purohit; Nidhi Shah
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2022-06

8.  Effective approach for improving a gummy smile : Upward movement of the maxillary occlusal plane using midpalatal miniscrews and a modified transpalatal arch.

Authors:  Ken Miyazawa; Yuka Tamada; Masako Tabuchi; Misuzu Kawaguchi; Momoko Shibata; Takuma Sato; Kyoko Okamoto; Natsuki Saito; Shigemi Goto
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 2.341

9.  Effect of large incisor retraction on upper airway morphology in adult bimaxillary protrusion patients.

Authors:  Yu Chen; Liu Hong; Chun-ling Wang; Shi-jie Zhang; Cong Cao; Fulan Wei; Tao Lv; Fan Zhang; Dong-xu Liu
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Occlusal plane canting reduction accompanies mandibular counterclockwise rotation in camouflaging treatment of hyperdivergent skeletal Class II malocclusion.

Authors:  Rui Ye; Yu Li; Xue Li; Juan Li; Jue Wang; Sen Zhao; Zhihe Zhao
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.