Literature DB >> 25174789

Systematic review and evidence based recommendations for the use of negative pressure wound therapy in the open abdomen.

A Bruhin1, F Ferreira2, M Chariker3, J Smith4, N Runkel5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) is widely used in the management of the open abdomen despite uncertainty regarding several aspects of usage. An expert panel was convened to develop evidence-based recommendations describing the use of NPWT in the open abdomen.
METHODS: A systematic review was carried out to investigate the efficacy of a range of Temporary Abdominal Closure methods including variants of NPWT. Evidence-based recommendations were developed by an International Expert Panel and graded according to the quality of supporting evidence.
RESULTS: Pooled results, in non-septic patients showed a 72% fascial closure rate following use of commercial NPWT kits in the open abdomen. This increased to 82% by the addition of a 'dynamic' closure method. Slightly lower rates were showed with use of Wittmann Patch (68%) and home-made NPWT (vac-pack) (58%). Patients with septic complications achieved a lower rate of fascial closure than non-septic patients but NPWT with dynamic closure remained the best option to achieve fascial closure. Mortality rates were consistent and seemed to be related to the underlying medical condition rather than being influenced by the choice of dressing, Treatment goals for open abdomen were defined prior to developing eleven specific evidence-based recommendations suitable for different stages and grades of open abdomen. DISCUSSION AND
CONCLUSION: The most efficient temporary abdominal closure techniques are NPWT kits with or without a dynamic closure procedure. Evidence-based recommendations will help to tailor its use in a complex treatment pathway for the individual patient.
Copyright © 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Evidence-based recommendations; Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT); Open abdomen; Systematic review; Temporary abdominal closure

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25174789     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.08.396

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Surg        ISSN: 1743-9159            Impact factor:   6.071


  38 in total

1.  Novel method for delayed primary closure and incisional hernia prevention in open abdomen: COmbined and MOdified Definitive Abdominal wall closure (COMODA).

Authors:  R Villalobos Mori; Y Maestre González; Mª Mias Carballal; C Gas Ruiz; G Protti Ruiz; A Escartin Arias; J J Olsina Kissler
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 2.  Classification, prevention and management of entero-atmospheric fistula: a state-of-the-art review.

Authors:  Salomone Di Saverio; Antonio Tarasconi; Dominik A Walczak; Roberto Cirocchi; Matteo Mandrioli; Arianna Birindelli; Gregorio Tugnoli
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Enteroatmospheric fistula management by endoscopic gastrostomy PEG tube.

Authors:  Luiz Ec Miranda; Ana Cg Miranda
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  The impact of standardized protocol implementation for surgical damage control and temporary abdominal closure after emergent laparotomy.

Authors:  Tyler J Loftus; Philip A Efron; Trina M Bala; Martin D Rosenthal; Chasen A Croft; Michael S Walters; R Stephen Smith; Frederick A Moore; Alicia M Mohr; Scott C Brakenridge
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.313

5.  Hypertonic saline resuscitation after emergent laparotomy and temporary abdominal closure.

Authors:  Tyler J Loftus; Philip A Efron; Trina M Bala; Martin D Rosenthal; Chasen A Croft; R Stephen Smith; Frederick A Moore; Alicia M Mohr; Scott C Brakenridge
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.313

6.  High risk of fistula formation in vacuum-assisted closure therapy in patients with open abdomen due to secondary peritonitis-a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Ioannis Mintziras; Michael Miligkos; Detlef Klaus Bartsch
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Open abdomen in gastrointestinal surgery: Which technique is the best for temporary closure during damage control?

Authors:  Marcelo A F Ribeiro Junior; Emily Alves Barros; Sabrina Marques de Carvalho; Vinicius Pereira Nascimento; José Cruvinel Neto; Alexandre Zanchenko Fonseca
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-08-27

8.  The Open Abdomen Route by EuraHS: introduction of the data set and initial results of procedures and procedure-related complications.

Authors:  A Willms; F Muysoms; C Güsgen; R Schwab; J Lock; S Schaaf; C Germer; I Richardsen; U Dietz
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 4.739

9.  Abdominal wall integrity after open abdomen: long-term results of vacuum-assisted wound closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction (VAWCM).

Authors:  A Willms; S Schaaf; R Schwab; I Richardsen; D Bieler; B Wagner; C Güsgen
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 4.739

10.  Quality of life and hernia development 5 years after open abdomen treatment with vacuum-assisted wound closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction.

Authors:  U Petersson; T Bjarnason; M Björck; A Montgomery; P Rogmark; M Svensson; K Sörelius; S Acosta
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 4.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.