Literature DB >> 27150438

High risk of fistula formation in vacuum-assisted closure therapy in patients with open abdomen due to secondary peritonitis-a retrospective analysis.

Ioannis Mintziras1, Michael Miligkos2, Detlef Klaus Bartsch3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of vacuum-assisted closure therapy in patients with open abdomen due to secondary peritonitis and to identify possible risk factors of fistula formation.
METHODS: The hospital OPS-database (time period 2005-2014) was searched to identify patients treated with an open abdomen due to secondary peritonitis, who underwent vacuum-assisted closure therapy. Medical records were retrospectively analyzed for patients' characteristics, cause of peritonitis, duration of vacuum therapy, number of relaparotomies, fascial closure rates, and risk factors of fistula formation.
RESULTS: Forty-three patients (19 male, 24 female) with a median age of 65 years (range 24-90 years) were identified. The major cause of secondary peritonitis was anastomotic leakage after intestinal anastomosis or bowel perforation, the median APACHE II score was 11. Median duration of VAC treatment was 12 days (range 3-88 days). Twenty of 43 (47 %) patients died from septic complications. Delayed fascial closure was obtained by suturing in 20 of 43 patients (47 %). Overall 16 of 43 (37 %) patients developed enteroatmospheric fistulas. Re-explorations after starting VAC treatment and duration of VAC therapy were significantly associated with the occurrence of enteroatmospheric fistulas (p < 0.001). ROC curve analysis determined the optimal duration of VAC therapy to reduce the risk of fistula formation at 13 days.
CONCLUSIONS: Long-term VAC treatment of patients with an open abdomen due to secondary peritonitis results in a relatively low fascial closure rate and a high risk of fistula formation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Enterocutaneous fistula; Open abdomen; Peritonitis; Vacuum-assisted closure therapy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27150438     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-016-1443-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   3.445


  29 in total

1.  The value of vacuum-assisted closure in septic patients treated with laparostomy.

Authors:  Ioannis Pliakos; Theodossis S Papavramidis; Nick Michalopoulos; Nickolaos Deligiannidis; Isaak Kesisoglou; Konstantinos Sapalidis; Spiros Papavramidis
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 0.688

2.  Open management of the abdomen and planned reoperations in severe bacterial peritonitis.

Authors:  K Bosscha; P F Hulstaert; M R Visser; T J van Vroonhoven; C van der Werken
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  2000-01

3.  Late fascial closure in lieu of ventral hernia: the next step in open abdomen management.

Authors:  Preston R Miller; James T Thompson; Byron J Faler; J Wayne Meredith; Michael C Chang
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2002-11

4.  Factors affecting primary fascial closure of the open abdomen in the nontrauma patient.

Authors:  Naeem Goussous; Brian D Kim; Donald H Jenkins; Martin D Zielinski
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 5.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of the open abdomen and temporary abdominal closure techniques in non-trauma patients.

Authors:  J J Atema; S L Gans; M A Boermeester
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Fluid volume overload negatively influences delayed primary facial closure in open abdomen management.

Authors:  Qian Huang; Risheng Zhao; Chao Yue; Wei Wang; Yunzhao Zhao; Jianan Ren; Ning Li; Jie shou Li
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2013-09-28       Impact factor: 2.192

Review 7.  Systematic review and evidence based recommendations for the use of negative pressure wound therapy in the open abdomen.

Authors:  A Bruhin; F Ferreira; M Chariker; J Smith; N Runkel
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 6.071

8.  Damage-control laparotomy in nontrauma patients: review of indications and outcomes.

Authors:  Afrasyab Khan; Li Hsee; Sachin Mathur; Ian Civil
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.313

Review 9.  Open abdomen management: a review of its history and a proposed management algorithm.

Authors:  Barbara E Kreis; Alexander Jc de Mol van Otterloo; Robert W Kreis
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2013-07-03

10.  Negative pressure wound therapy for the treatment of the open abdomen and incidence of enteral fistulas: a retrospective bicentre analysis.

Authors:  Sven Richter; Stefan Dold; Johannes P Doberauer; Peter Mai; Jochen Schuld
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 2.260

View more
  3 in total

1.  Vacuum-assisted closure versus on-demand relaparotomy in patients with secondary peritonitis-the VACOR trial: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Pooya Rajabaleyan; Jens Michelsen; Uffe Tange Holst; Sören Möller; Palle Toft; Jan Luxhøi; Musa Buyukuslu; Aske Mathias Bohm; Lars Borly; Gabriel Sandblom; Martin Kobborg; Kristian Aagaard Poulsen; Uffe Schou Løve; Sophie Ovesen; Christoffer Grant Sølling; Birgitte Mørch Søndergaard; Marianne Lund Lomholt; Dorthe Ritz Møller; Niels Qvist; Mark Bremholm Ellebæk
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 8.165

2.  Chinese Trauma Surgeon Association for management guidelines of vacuum sealing drainage application in abdominal surgeries-Update and systematic review.

Authors:  Yang Li; Pei-Yuan Li; Shi-Jing Sun; Yuan-Zhang Yao; Zhan-Fei Li; Tao Liu; Fan Yang; Lian-Yang Zhang; Xiang-Jun Bai; Jing-Shan Huo; Wu-Bing He; Jun Ouyang; Lei Peng; Ping Hu; Yan-An Zhu; Ping Jin; Qi-Feng Shao; Yan-Feng Wang; Rui-Wu Dai; Pei-Yang Hu; Hai-Ming Chen; Ge-Fei Wang; Yong-Gao Wang; Hong-Xu Jin; Chang-Ju Zhu; Qi-Yong Zhang; Biao Shao; Xi-Guang Sang; Chang-Lin Yin
Journal:  Chin J Traumatol       Date:  2019-02-14

3.  Outcome in patients with open abdomen treatment for peritonitis: a multidomain approach outperforms single domain predictions.

Authors:  Sven Petersen; Markus Huber; Federico Storni; Gero Puhl; Alice Deder; Axel Prause; Joerg C Schefold; Dietrich Doll; Patrick Schober; Markus M Luedi
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 1.977

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.