Literature DB >> 25173845

Hybrid incompatibility arises in a sequence-based bioenergetic model of transcription factor binding.

Alexander Y Tulchinsky1, Norman A Johnson2, Ward B Watt3, Adam H Porter4.   

Abstract

Postzygotic isolation between incipient species results from the accumulation of incompatibilities that arise as a consequence of genetic divergence. When phenotypes are determined by regulatory interactions, hybrid incompatibility can evolve even as a consequence of parallel adaptation in parental populations because interacting genes can produce the same phenotype through incompatible allelic combinations. We explore the evolutionary conditions that promote and constrain hybrid incompatibility in regulatory networks using a bioenergetic model (combining thermodynamics and kinetics) of transcriptional regulation, considering the bioenergetic basis of molecular interactions between transcription factors (TFs) and their binding sites. The bioenergetic parameters consider the free energy of formation of the bond between the TF and its binding site and the availability of TFs in the intracellular environment. Together these determine fractional occupancy of the TF on the promoter site, the degree of subsequent gene expression and in diploids, and the degree of dominance among allelic interactions. This results in a sigmoid genotype-phenotype map and fitness landscape, with the details of the shape determining the degree of bioenergetic evolutionary constraint on hybrid incompatibility. Using individual-based simulations, we subjected two allopatric populations to parallel directional or stabilizing selection. Misregulation of hybrid gene expression occurred under either type of selection, although it evolved faster under directional selection. Under directional selection, the extent of hybrid incompatibility increased with the slope of the genotype-phenotype map near the derived parental expression level. Under stabilizing selection, hybrid incompatibility arose from compensatory mutations and was greater when the bioenergetic properties of the interaction caused the space of nearly neutral genotypes around the stable expression level to be wide. F2's showed higher hybrid incompatibility than F1's to the extent that the bioenergetic properties favored dominant regulatory interactions. The present model is a mechanistically explicit case of the Bateson-Dobzhansky-Muller model, connecting environmental selective pressure to hybrid incompatibility through the molecular mechanism of regulatory divergence. The bioenergetic parameters that determine expression represent measurable properties of transcriptional regulation, providing a predictive framework for empirical studies of how phenotypic evolution results in epistatic incompatibility at the molecular level in hybrids.
Copyright © 2014 by the Genetics Society of America.

Keywords:  Dobzhansky–Muller interactions; adaptive landscape; cis–trans coevolution; genotype–phenotype map; regulatory evolution; speciation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25173845      PMCID: PMC4224158          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.114.168112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  51 in total

1.  Physical constraints and functional characteristics of transcription factor-DNA interaction.

Authors:  Ulrich Gerland; J David Moroz; Terence Hwa
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-09-06       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Evolution of branched regulatory genetic pathways: directional selection on pleiotropic loci accelerates developmental system drift.

Authors:  Norman A Johnson; Adam H Porter
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2006-08-16       Impact factor: 1.082

Review 3.  The evolutionary significance of cis-regulatory mutations.

Authors:  Gregory A Wray
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  Allelic imbalance in Drosophila hybrid heads: exons, isoforms, and evolution.

Authors:  R M Graze; L L Novelo; V Amin; J M Fear; G Casella; S V Nuzhdin; L M McIntyre
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2012-01-07       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  Between "design" and "bricolage": genetic networks, levels of selection, and adaptive evolution.

Authors:  Adam S Wilkins
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Evidence for ecological speciation and its alternative.

Authors:  Dolph Schluter
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  Ecological explanations for (incomplete) speciation.

Authors:  Patrik Nosil; Luke J Harmon; Ole Seehausen
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 17.712

8.  Rapid sequence evolution of transcription factors controlling neuron differentiation in Caenorhabditis.

Authors:  Richard Jovelin
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  Evaluating thermodynamic models of enhancer activity on cellular resolution gene expression data.

Authors:  Abul Hassan Samee; Saurabh Sinha
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 3.608

10.  Compensatory cis-trans evolution and the dysregulation of gene expression in interspecific hybrids of Drosophila.

Authors:  Christian R Landry; Patricia J Wittkopp; Clifford H Taubes; Jose M Ranz; Andrew G Clark; Daniel L Hartl
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-09-02       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  17 in total

1.  Neighboring genes for DNA-binding proteins rescue male sterility in Drosophila hybrids.

Authors:  Marjorie A Liénard; Luciana O Araripe; Daniel L Hartl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Hybrid incompatibility despite pleiotropic constraint in a sequence-based bioenergetic model of transcription factor binding.

Authors:  Alexander Y Tulchinsky; Norman A Johnson; Adam H Porter
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Spiraling Complexity: A Test of the Snowball Effect in a Computational Model of RNA Folding.

Authors:  Ata Kalirad; Ricardo B R Azevedo
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  A New Mechanism for Mendelian Dominance in Regulatory Genetic Pathways: Competitive Binding by Transcription Factors.

Authors:  Adam H Porter; Norman A Johnson; Alexander Y Tulchinsky
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  The Pace of Hybrid Incompatibility Evolution in House Mice.

Authors:  Richard J Wang; Michael A White; Bret A Payseur
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  Gene Regulation and Speciation.

Authors:  Katya L Mack; Michael W Nachman
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 11.639

7.  A coarse-grained biophysical model of sequence evolution and the population size dependence of the speciation rate.

Authors:  Bhavin S Khatri; Richard A Goldstein
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 2.691

8.  Simple Biophysical Model Predicts Faster Accumulation of Hybrid Incompatibilities in Small Populations Under Stabilizing Selection.

Authors:  Bhavin S Khatri; Richard A Goldstein
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-10-04       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Divergence in gene expression within and between two closely related flycatcher species.

Authors:  Severin Uebbing; Axel Künstner; Hannu Mäkinen; Niclas Backström; Paulina Bolivar; Reto Burri; Ludovic Dutoit; Carina F Mugal; Alexander Nater; Bronwen Aken; Paul Flicek; Fergal J Martin; Stephen M J Searle; Hans Ellegren
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2016-04-02       Impact factor: 6.185

10.  Gene regulation and speciation in house mice.

Authors:  Katya L Mack; Polly Campbell; Michael W Nachman
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 9.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.