Literature DB >> 25313130

Hybrid incompatibility despite pleiotropic constraint in a sequence-based bioenergetic model of transcription factor binding.

Alexander Y Tulchinsky1, Norman A Johnson2, Adam H Porter3.   

Abstract

Hybrid incompatibility can result from gene misregulation produced by divergence in trans-acting regulatory factors and their cis-regulatory targets. However, change in trans-acting factors may be constrained by pleiotropy, which would in turn limit the evolution of incompatibility. We employed a mechanistically explicit bioenergetic model of gene expression wherein parameter combinations (number of transcription factor molecules, energetic properties of binding to the regulatory site, and genomic background size) determine the shape of the genotype-phenotype (G-P) map, and interacting allelic variants of mutable cis and trans sites determine the phenotype along that map. Misregulation occurs when the phenotype differs from its optimal value. We simulated a pleiotropic regulatory pathway involving a positively selected and a conserved trait regulated by a shared transcription factor (TF), with two populations evolving in parallel. Pleiotropic constraints shifted evolution in the positively selected trait to its cis-regulatory locus. We nevertheless found that the TF genotypes often evolved, accompanied by compensatory evolution in the conserved trait, and both traits contributed to hybrid misregulation. Compensatory evolution resulted in "developmental system drift," whereby the regulatory basis of the conserved phenotype changed although the phenotype itself did not. Pleiotropic constraints became stronger and in some cases prohibitive when the bioenergetic properties of the molecular interaction produced a G-P map that was too steep. Likewise, compensatory evolution slowed and hybrid misregulation was not evident when the G-P map was too shallow. A broad pleiotropic "sweet spot" nevertheless existed where evolutionary constraints were moderate to weak, permitting substantial hybrid misregulation in both traits. None of these pleiotropic constraints manifested when the TF contained nonrecombining domains independently regulating the respective traits.
Copyright © 2014 by the Genetics Society of America.

Keywords:  Dobzhansky–Muller interaction; evolutionary constraint; regulatory evolution; speciation; statistical thermodynamics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25313130      PMCID: PMC4256777          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.114.171397

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  37 in total

1.  Repeated morphological evolution through cis-regulatory changes in a pleiotropic gene.

Authors:  Benjamin Prud'homme; Nicolas Gompel; Antonis Rokas; Victoria A Kassner; Thomas M Williams; Shu-Dan Yeh; John R True; Sean B Carroll
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-04-20       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Gene expression divergence and the origin of hybrid dysfunctions.

Authors:  Daniel Ortíz-Barrientos; Brian A Counterman; Mohamed A F Noor
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2006-10-17       Impact factor: 1.082

3.  Compensatory vs. pseudocompensatory evolution in molecular and developmental interactions.

Authors:  Eric S Haag
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 1.082

Review 4.  The evolutionary significance of cis-regulatory mutations.

Authors:  Gregory A Wray
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  Emerging principles of regulatory evolution.

Authors:  Benjamin Prud'homme; Nicolas Gompel; Sean B Carroll
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Genome clashes in hybrids: insights from gene expression.

Authors:  C R Landry; D L Hartl; J M Ranz
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 3.821

7.  Evo-devo and an expanding evolutionary synthesis: a genetic theory of morphological evolution.

Authors:  Sean B Carroll
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 8.  The gene regulatory logic of transcription factor evolution.

Authors:  Günter P Wagner; Vincent J Lynch
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 17.712

9.  Compensatory cis-trans evolution and the dysregulation of gene expression in interspecific hybrids of Drosophila.

Authors:  Christian R Landry; Patricia J Wittkopp; Clifford H Taubes; Jose M Ranz; Andrew G Clark; Daniel L Hartl
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-09-02       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Regulatory changes underlying expression differences within and between Drosophila species.

Authors:  Patricia J Wittkopp; Belinda K Haerum; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2008-02-17       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  6 in total

1.  Neighboring genes for DNA-binding proteins rescue male sterility in Drosophila hybrids.

Authors:  Marjorie A Liénard; Luciana O Araripe; Daniel L Hartl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Multi-locus interactions and the build-up of reproductive isolation.

Authors:  I Satokangas; S H Martin; H Helanterä; J Saramäki; J Kulmuni
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Gene Regulation and Speciation.

Authors:  Katya L Mack; Michael W Nachman
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 11.639

4.  Simple Biophysical Model Predicts Faster Accumulation of Hybrid Incompatibilities in Small Populations Under Stabilizing Selection.

Authors:  Bhavin S Khatri; Richard A Goldstein
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-10-04       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Divergence in gene expression within and between two closely related flycatcher species.

Authors:  Severin Uebbing; Axel Künstner; Hannu Mäkinen; Niclas Backström; Paulina Bolivar; Reto Burri; Ludovic Dutoit; Carina F Mugal; Alexander Nater; Bronwen Aken; Paul Flicek; Fergal J Martin; Stephen M J Searle; Hans Ellegren
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2016-04-02       Impact factor: 6.185

Review 6.  Speciation and the developmental alarm clock.

Authors:  Asher D Cutter; Joanna D Bundus
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 8.140

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.