Literature DB >> 25165595

Mesoscale fronts as foraging habitats: composite front mapping reveals oceanographic drivers of habitat use for a pelagic seabird.

Kylie L Scales1, Peter I Miller2, Clare B Embling3, Simon N Ingram3, Enrico Pirotta4, Stephen C Votier5.   

Abstract

The oceanographic drivers of marine vertebrate habitat use are poorly understood yet fundamental to our knowledge of marine ecosystem functioning. Here, we use composite front mapping and high-resolution GPS tracking to determine the significance of mesoscale oceanographic fronts as physical drivers of foraging habitat selection in northern gannets Morus bassanus. We tracked 66 breeding gannets from a Celtic Sea colony over 2 years and used residence time to identify area-restricted search (ARS) behaviour. Composite front maps identified thermal and chlorophyll-a mesoscale fronts at two different temporal scales-(i) contemporaneous fronts and (ii) seasonally persistent frontal zones. Using generalized additive models (GAMs), with generalized estimating equations (GEE-GAMs) to account for serial autocorrelation in tracking data, we found that gannets do not adjust their behaviour in response to contemporaneous fronts. However, ARS was more likely to occur within spatially predictable, seasonally persistent frontal zones (GAMs). Our results provide proof of concept that composite front mapping is a useful tool for studying the influence of oceanographic features on animal movements. Moreover, we highlight that frontal persistence is a crucial element of the formation of pelagic foraging hotspots for mobile marine vertebrates.
© 2014 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  foraging; habitat use; marine vertebrate; oceanographic front; remote sensing; seabird

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25165595      PMCID: PMC4191095          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2014.0679

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  21 in total

1.  Hierarchical patch dynamics and animal movement pattern.

Authors:  Per Fauchald; Torkild Tveraa
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-06-23       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Encounter success of free-ranging marine predator movements across a dynamic prey landscape.

Authors:  David W Sims; Matthew J Witt; Anthony J Richardson; Emily J Southall; Julian D Metcalfe
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Top marine predators track Lagrangian coherent structures.

Authors:  Emilie Tew Kai; Vincent Rossi; Joel Sudre; Henri Weimerskirch; Cristobal Lopez; Emilio Hernandez-Garcia; Francis Marsac; Veronique Garçon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Animal movements in heterogeneous landscapes: identifying profitable places and homogeneous movement bouts.

Authors:  Frédéric Barraquand; Simon Benhamou
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.499

5.  Tracking apex marine predator movements in a dynamic ocean.

Authors:  B A Block; I D Jonsen; S J Jorgensen; A J Winship; S A Shaffer; S J Bograd; E L Hazen; D G Foley; G A Breed; A-L Harrison; J E Ganong; A Swithenbank; M Castleton; H Dewar; B R Mate; G L Shillinger; K M Schaefer; S R Benson; M J Weise; R W Henry; D P Costa
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Sensitivity to dimethyl sulphide suggests a mechanism for olfactory navigation by seabirds.

Authors:  Gabrielle A Nevitt; Francesco Bonadonna
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2005-09-22       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  At-sea distribution and scale-dependent foraging behaviour of petrels and albatrosses: a comparative study.

Authors:  David Pinaud; Henri Weimerskirch
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.091

8.  Northern gannets anticipate the spatio-temporal occurrence of their prey.

Authors:  E Pettex; F Bonadonna; M R Enstipp; F Siorat; D Grémillet
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Fidelity and over-wintering of sea turtles.

Authors:  Annette C Broderick; Michael S Coyne; Wayne J Fuller; Fiona Glen; Brendan J Godley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Fine-scale foraging behaviour of a medium-ranging marine predator.

Authors:  K C Hamer; E M Humphreys; M C Magalhães; S Garthe; J Hennicke; G Peters; D Grémillet; H Skov; S Wanless
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 5.091

View more
  17 in total

1.  Recent prey capture experience and dynamic habitat quality mediate short-term foraging site fidelity in a seabird.

Authors:  Gemma Carroll; Robert Harcourt; Benjamin J Pitcher; David Slip; Ian Jonsen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Dual foraging and pair coordination during chick provisioning by Manx shearwaters: empirical evidence supported by a simple model.

Authors:  Akiko Shoji; Stéphane Aris-Brosou; Annette Fayet; Oliver Padget; Christopher Perrins; Tim Guilford
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Seabird diving behaviour reveals the functional significance of shelf-sea fronts as foraging hotspots.

Authors:  S L Cox; P I Miller; C B Embling; K L Scales; A W J Bicknell; P J Hosegood; G Morgan; S N Ingram; S C Votier
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 2.963

4.  Modeling Nonresident Seabird Foraging Distributions to Inform Ocean Zoning in Central California.

Authors:  Anna J Studwell; Ellen Hines; Meredith L Elliott; Julie Howar; Barbara Holzman; Nadav Nur; Jaime Jahncke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Effects of age and reproductive status on individual foraging site fidelity in a long-lived marine predator.

Authors:  Stephen C Votier; Annette L Fayet; Stuart Bearhop; Thomas W Bodey; Bethany L Clark; James Grecian; Tim Guilford; Keith C Hamer; Jana W E Jeglinski; Greg Morgan; Ewan Wakefield; Samantha C Patrick
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Dynamic oceanography determines fine scale foraging behavior of Masked Boobies in the Gulf of Mexico.

Authors:  Caroline L Poli; Autumn-Lynn Harrison; Adriana Vallarino; Patrick D Gerard; Patrick G R Jodice
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Navigating uncertain waters: a critical review of inferring foraging behaviour from location and dive data in pinnipeds.

Authors:  Matt Ian Daniel Carter; Kimberley A Bennett; Clare B Embling; Philip J Hosegood; Debbie J F Russell
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 3.600

8.  Understanding the ontogeny of foraging behaviour: insights from combining marine predator bio-logging with satellite-derived oceanography in hidden Markov models.

Authors:  W James Grecian; Jude V Lane; Théo Michelot; Helen M Wade; Keith C Hamer
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  Predictive Modelling to Identify Near-Shore, Fine-Scale Seabird Distributions during the Breeding Season.

Authors:  Victoria C Warwick-Evans; Philip W Atkinson; Leonie A Robinson; Jonathan A Green
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Wintering North Pacific black-legged kittiwakes balance spatial flexibility and consistency.

Authors:  Rachael A Orben; Rosana Paredes; Daniel D Roby; David B Irons; Scott A Shaffer
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 3.600

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.