Literature DB >> 17184348

At-sea distribution and scale-dependent foraging behaviour of petrels and albatrosses: a comparative study.

David Pinaud1, Henri Weimerskirch.   

Abstract

1. In order to study and predict population distribution, it is crucial to identify and understand factors affecting individual movement decisions at different scales. Movements of foraging animals should be adjusted to the hierarchical spatial distribution of resources in the environment and this scale-dependent response to environmental heterogeneity should differ according to the forager's characteristics and exploited habitats. 2. Using First-Passage Time analysis, we studied scales of search effort and habitat used by individuals of seven sympatric Indian Ocean Procellariiform species fitted with satellite transmitters. We characterized their search effort distribution and examined whether species differ in scale-dependent adjustments of their movements according to the marine environment exploited. 3. All species and almost all individuals (91% of 122 individuals) exhibited an Area-Restricted Search (ARS) during foraging. At a regional scale (1000s km), foraging ranges showed a large spatial overlap between species. At a smaller scale (100s km, at which an increase in search effort occurred), a segregation in environmental characteristics of ARS zones (where search effort is high) was found between species. 4. Spatial scales at which individuals increased their search effort differed between species and also between exploited habitats, indicating a similar movement adjustment for predators foraging in the same habitat. ARS zones of the two populations of wandering albatross Diomedea exulans (Crozet and Kerguelen) were similar in their adjustments (i.e. same ARS scale) as well as in their environmental characteristics. These two populations showed a weak spatial overlap in their foraging distribution, with males foraging in more southerly waters than females in both populations. 5. This study demonstrates that predators of several species adjust their foraging behaviour to the heterogeneous environment and these scale-dependent movement adjustments depend on both forager and environment characteristics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17184348     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01186.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  29 in total

1.  Stable isotopes reveal individual variation in migration strategies and habitat preferences in a suite of seabirds during the nonbreeding period.

Authors:  Richard A Phillips; Stuart Bearhop; Rona A R McGill; Deborah A Dawson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-04-18       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Survival and local recruitment are driven by environmental carry-over effects from the wintering area in a migratory seabird.

Authors:  K Lesley Szostek; Peter H Becker
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-04-12       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Black Petrels (Procellaria parkinsoni) patrol the ocean shelf-break: GPS tracking of a vulnerable procellariiform seabird.

Authors:  Robin Freeman; Todd Dennis; Todd Landers; David Thompson; Elizabeth Bell; Mike Walker; Tim Guilford
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Mesoscale fronts as foraging habitats: composite front mapping reveals oceanographic drivers of habitat use for a pelagic seabird.

Authors:  Kylie L Scales; Peter I Miller; Clare B Embling; Simon N Ingram; Enrico Pirotta; Stephen C Votier
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Different location sampling frequencies by satellite tags yield different estimates of migration performance: pooling data requires a common protocol.

Authors:  Alessandro Tanferna; Lidia López-Jiménez; Julio Blas; Fernando Hiraldo; Fabrizio Sergio
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Should I stay or should I go? A habitat-dependent dispersal kernel improves prediction of movement.

Authors:  Fabrice Vinatier; Françoise Lescourret; Pierre-François Duyck; Olivier Martin; Rachid Senoussi; Philippe Tixier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Seascape genetics of a globally distributed, highly mobile marine mammal: the short-beaked common dolphin (genus Delphinus).

Authors:  Ana R Amaral; Luciano B Beheregaray; Kerstin Bilgmann; Dmitri Boutov; Luís Freitas; Kelly M Robertson; Marina Sequeira; Karen A Stockin; M Manuela Coelho; Luciana M Möller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Bringing home the trash: do colony-based differences in foraging distribution lead to increased plastic ingestion in Laysan albatrosses?

Authors:  Lindsay C Young; Cynthia Vanderlip; David C Duffy; Vsevolod Afanasyev; Scott A Shaffer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Foraging parameters influencing the detection and interpretation of area-restricted search behaviour in marine predators: a case study with the masked booby.

Authors:  Julia Sommerfeld; Akiko Kato; Yan Ropert-Coudert; Stefan Garthe; Mark A Hindell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  How predictability of feeding patches affects home range and foraging habitat selection in avian social scavengers?

Authors:  Sophie Monsarrat; Simon Benhamou; François Sarrazin; Carmen Bessa-Gomes; Willem Bouten; Olivier Duriez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.