Literature DB >> 19426254

Fine-scale foraging behaviour of a medium-ranging marine predator.

K C Hamer1, E M Humphreys, M C Magalhães, S Garthe, J Hennicke, G Peters, D Grémillet, H Skov, S Wanless.   

Abstract

1. Movement patterns of predators should allow them to detect and respond to prey patches at different spatial scales, particularly through the adoption of area-restricted search (ARS) behaviour. Here we use fine-scale movement and activity data combined with first-passage time (FPT) analysis to examine the foraging strategy of northern gannets Morus bassanus in the western North Sea, and to test the following hypotheses: (i) birds adopt a hierarchical foraging strategy characterized by nested ARS behaviour; (ii) the locations and characteristics of ARS zones are strongly influenced by physical oceanography; (iii) the initiation of ARS behaviour is triggered by the detection and pursuit of prey; (iv) ARS behaviour is strongly linked to increased foraging effort, particularly within nested ARS areas. 2. Birds on 13 of 15 foraging trips adopted ARS behaviour at a scale of 9.1 +/- 1.9 km, and birds on 10 of these 13 trips adopted a second, nested ARS scale of 1.5 +/- 0.8 km, supporting hypothesis 1 above. ARS zones were located 117 +/- 55 km from the colony and over half were within 5 km of a tidal mixing front ~50 km offshore, supporting hypothesis 2 above. 3. The initiation of ARS behaviour was usually followed after only a short time interval (typically ~5 min) by the commencement of diving. Gannets do not dive until after they have located prey, and so this pattern strongly suggests that ARS behaviour was triggered by prey detection, supporting hypothesis 3 above. However, ~33% of dives in mixed coastal water and 16% of dives in stratified water were not associated with any detectable ARS behaviour. Hence, while ARS behaviour resulted from the detection and pursuit of prey, encounters with prey species did not inevitably induce ARS behaviour. 4. Following the initiation of ARS behaviour, dive rates were almost four times higher within ARS zones than elsewhere and almost three times higher in zones with nested ARS behaviour than in those without, supporting hypothesis 4 above and suggesting that the foraging success of birds was linked to their ability to match the hierarchical distribution of prey.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19426254     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01549.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  19 in total

1.  Tidal drift removes the need for area-restricted search in foraging Atlantic puffins.

Authors:  Ashley Bennison; John L Quinn; Alison Debney; Mark Jessopp
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Prey encounters and spatial memory influence use of foraging patches in a marine central place forager.

Authors:  Virginia Iorio-Merlo; Isla M Graham; Rebecca C Hewitt; Geert Aarts; Enrico Pirotta; Gordon D Hastie; Paul M Thompson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Mesoscale fronts as foraging habitats: composite front mapping reveals oceanographic drivers of habitat use for a pelagic seabird.

Authors:  Kylie L Scales; Peter I Miller; Clare B Embling; Simon N Ingram; Enrico Pirotta; Stephen C Votier
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  The Foraging Ecology of the Endangered Cape Verde Shearwater, a Sentinel Species for Marine Conservation off West Africa.

Authors:  Vitor H Paiva; Pedro Geraldes; Isabel Rodrigues; Tommy Melo; José Melo; Jaime A Ramos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Excess baggage for birds: inappropriate placement of tags on gannets changes flight patterns.

Authors:  Sylvie P Vandenabeele; Edward Grundy; Michael I Friswell; Adam Grogan; Stephen C Votier; Rory P Wilson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Modelling foraging movements of diving predators: a theoretical study exploring the effect of heterogeneous landscapes on foraging efficiency.

Authors:  Marianna Chimienti; Kamil A Bartoń; Beth E Scott; Justin M J Travis
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Foraging parameters influencing the detection and interpretation of area-restricted search behaviour in marine predators: a case study with the masked booby.

Authors:  Julia Sommerfeld; Akiko Kato; Yan Ropert-Coudert; Stefan Garthe; Mark A Hindell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A bird's eye view of discard reforms: bird-borne cameras reveal seabird/fishery interactions.

Authors:  Stephen C Votier; Anthony Bicknell; Samantha L Cox; Kylie L Scales; Samantha C Patrick
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Steady as he goes: at-sea movement of adult male Australian sea lions in a dynamic marine environment.

Authors:  Andrew D Lowther; Robert G Harcourt; Bradley Page; Simon D Goldsworthy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Phenology and cover of plant growth forms predict herbivore habitat selection in a high latitude ecosystem.

Authors:  Marianne Iversen; Per Fauchald; Knut Langeland; Rolf A Ims; Nigel G Yoccoz; Kari Anne Bråthen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.