| Literature DB >> 25165478 |
Weiru Xu1, Guowang Yang1, Yongmei Xu1, Qing Zhang1, Qi Fu1, Jie Yu1, Mingwei Yu1, Wenshuo Zhao1, Zhong Yang1, Fengshan Hu1, Dong Han1, Xiaomin Wang1.
Abstract
Lung cancer has become the leading cause of cancer deaths, with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounting for around 80% of lung cancer cases. Chemotherapy is the main conventional therapy for advanced NSCLC. However, the disease control achieved with classical chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC is usually restricted to only a few months. Thus, sustaining the therapeutic effect of first-line chemotherapy is an important problem that requires study. Maintenance therapy is given for patients with advanced NSCLC if three is no tumor progression after four to six cycles of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. However, selection of appropriate maintenance therapy depends on several factors, while traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) as maintenance therapy is recommended for all kinds of patients. It has been demonstrated that TCM can prolong the survival time, improve the quality of life (QOL), and reduce the side effects for advanced NSCLC. Although the trials we searched about TCM serving as maintenance therapy is only 9 studies, the results indicate TCM can prolong the progression free survival (PFS) and improve the QOL. So it is possible for TCM to be as maintenance therapy for advanced NSCLC. More rigorous trials are required to further verify its efficacy.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25165478 PMCID: PMC4137694 DOI: 10.1155/2014/278917
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
The characteristics of the trials for TCM as maintenance therapy in the treatment of advanced NSCLC.
| Authors | TNM stage of NSCLC | Design of study | Patients ( | Intervention | Measurements | PFS, OS, MST, and TTP (m) | Results/conclusion | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment group | Control group | Treatment group | Control group | ||||||
| Liu et al., 2009 [ | Nonoperatable IIIA-IV | RCT | 31 | 31 |
| — | FACT-L, KPS, clinical symptoms | — |
|
| Chai et al., 2011 [ | IIIB-IV | RCT | 32 | 32 |
| — | MST, PFS | PFS: 5.1 versus 2.5 ( |
|
| Jiang et al., 2011 [ | IIIB-IV | RCT | 25 | 25 | Comprehensive TCM therapy | Gemcitabine/P | TTP, QOL(EORTC QLQ-LC43) | TTP: 2.9 versus 2.13 ( | The TCM comprehensive regimen had equivalent efficacy on TTP but better QOL when compared with single-agent chemotherapy. |
| Xi et al., 2011 [ | III-IV | RCT | 44 | 34 |
| — | PFS, clinical symptoms | median PFS: 5.67 versus 4.12 ( |
|
| Zeng et al., 2013 [ | IV | RCT | 34 | 35 |
| — | Medin PFS, KPS, immune function (T-lymphocyte subtypes) | median PFS: 6.5 versus 6.2 ( |
|
|
Yang 2013 [ | III-IV | RCT | 40 | 40 |
| — | PFS | PFS: 7.5 versus 4.8 ( |
|
| Liang and Zhang 2013 [ | IIIB-IV | RCT | 38 | 36 |
| — | MST, PFS | PFS: 4.8 versus 2.37 ( |
|
| Wang et al., 2013 [ | IV | RCT | 39 | 37 | TCM therapy based on syndrome differentiation | — | PFS, QOL(EORTC-QLQ-C30), clinical symptoms | PFS: 7.2 versus 4.4 ( | TCM therapy based on syndrome differentiation can improve the QOL, clinical symptoms and prolong the PFS. |
| Wu et al., 2014 [ | IIIB-IV | Nonrandomized controlled trial | 20 | 20 |
| — | DCR, PFS, OS | PFS: 4.35 versus 2.67 ( |
|
RCT: randomized controlled trial; FACT-L: functional assessment of cancer therapy-lung; MST: median survival time; PFS: progression free survival; TTP: time to progression; QOL: quality of life; EORTC: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer; KPS: Karnofsky performance status; TCM: traditional Chinese medicine; DCR: disease control rate; OS: overall survival.