Literature DB >> 22336221

Quality of life in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer given maintenance treatment with pemetrexed versus placebo (H3E-MC-JMEN): results from a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 study.

Chandra P Belani1, Thomas Brodowicz, Tudor E Ciuleanu, Maciej Krzakowski, Sung Hyun Yang, Fábio Franke, Branka Cucevic, Jayaprakash Madhavan, Armando Santoro, Rodryg Ramlau, Astra M Liepa, Carla Visseren-Grul, Patrick Peterson, William J John, Christoph C Zielinski.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pemetrexed maintenance therapy significantly improved overall survival and progression-free survival compared with placebo, and had a good safety profile in a phase 3 placebo-controlled study in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Results for quality of life, symptom palliation, and tolerability are presented here.
METHODS: After four cycles of platinum-based induction therapy, 663 patients with stage IIIB or stage IV NSCLC and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 were randomly assigned (in a 2:1 ratio) from March 15, 2005, to July 20, 2007, using the Pocock and Simon minimisation method to receive pemetrexed (500 mg/m(2) every 21 days; n=441) or placebo (n=222) plus best supportive care until disease progression. The primary efficacy data have been reported previously. Patients completed the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) at baseline, after each cycle, and post-discontinuation. Worsening of symptoms was defined as an increase of 15 mm or more from baseline on a 100 mm scale for each LCSS item. The primary outcome for these quality-of-life analyses was time to worsening of symptoms, analysed for all randomised patients. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00102804.
FINDINGS: Baseline characteristics, including LCSS scores, were well balanced between groups. Baseline LCSS scores were low, indicating low symptom burden for patients without disease progression after completion of first-line treatment. Longer time to worsening was recorded for pain (hazard ratio [HR] 0·76, 95% CI 0·59-0·99; p=0·041) and haemoptysis (HR 0·58, 95% CI 0·34-0·97; p=0·038) with pemetrexed than with placebo; no other significant differences in analyses of time to worsening were noted. Additional longitudinal analyses showed a greater increase in loss of appetite in the pemetrexed group than in the placebo group (4·3 mm vs 0·2 mm; p=0·028). Rates of resource use were statistically higher for pemetrexed than for placebo: admissions to hospital for drug-related adverse events (19 [4%] vs none; p=0·001), transfusions (42 [10%] vs seven [3%]; p=0·003), and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (26 [6%] vs four [2%]; p=0·017).
INTERPRETATION: Quality of life during maintenance therapy with pemetrexed is similar to placebo, except for a small increase in loss of appetite, and significantly delayed worsening of pain and haemoptysis. In view of the improvements in overall and progression-free survival noted with pemetrexed maintenance therapy, such treatment is an option for patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC who have not progressed after platinum-based induction therapy. FUNDING: Eli Lilly.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22336221     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70339-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  24 in total

1.  Lung cancer: Maintenance chemotherapy--a stitch in time saves nine?

Authors:  Rebecca Kirk
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 2.  Maintenance chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: new life for an old idea.

Authors:  David E Gerber; Joan H Schiller
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Physician Agency and Patient Survival.

Authors:  Mireille G Jacobson; Tom Y Chang; Craig C Earle; Joseph P Newhouse
Journal:  J Econ Behav Organ       Date:  2016-12-02

Review 4.  Maintenance treatment after induction therapy in non-small cell lung cancer: latest evidence and clinical implications.

Authors:  Ryan D Gentzler; Jyoti D Patel
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 8.168

5.  Advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): maintenance therapy for all?

Authors:  Nooshin Hashemi-Sadraei; Nathan A Pennell
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2012-12

Review 6.  Pemetrexed for advanced stage nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer: latest evidence about its extended use and outcomes.

Authors:  Pascale Tomasini; Fabrice Barlesi; Celine Mascaux; Laurent Greillier
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 8.168

7.  Efficacy and safety of capecitabine as maintenance treatment after first-line chemotherapy using oxaliplatin and capecitabine in advanced gastric adenocarcinoma patients: a prospective observation.

Authors:  Miao-zhen Qiu; Xiao-li Wei; Dong-sheng Zhang; Ying Jin; Yi-xin Zhou; De-shen Wang; Chao Ren; Long Bai; Hui-yan Luo; Zhi-qiang Wang; Feng-hua Wang; Yu-hong Li; Da-jun Yang; Rui-hua Xu
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-02-11

Review 8.  Systematic review of efficacy and safety of pemetrexed in non-small-cell-lung cancer.

Authors:  Maria Antonia Pérez-Moreno; Mercedes Galván-Banqueri; Sandra Flores-Moreno; Angela Villalba-Moreno; Jesús Cotrina-Luque; Francisco Javier Bautista-Paloma
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2014-03-04

Review 9.  The continuing role of chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the targeted therapy era.

Authors:  Zarnie Lwin; Jonathan W Riess; David Gandara
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.895

10.  Treatment of stage IV non-small cell lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Mark A Socinski; Tracey Evans; Scott Gettinger; Thomas A Hensing; Lecia VanDam Sequist; Belinda Ireland; Thomas E Stinchcombe
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 9.410

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.