Literature DB >> 22949150

Randomized, phase III study of gemcitabine or erlotinib maintenance therapy versus observation, with predefined second-line treatment, after cisplatin-gemcitabine induction chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Maurice Pérol1, Christos Chouaid, David Pérol, Fabrice Barlési, Radj Gervais, Virginie Westeel, Jacky Crequit, Hervé Léna, Alain Vergnenègre, Gérard Zalcman, Isabelle Monnet, Hervé Le Caer, Pierre Fournel, Lionel Falchero, Michel Poudenx, Fabien Vaylet, Céline Ségura-Ferlay, Mojgan Devouassoux-Shisheboran, Miquel Taron, Bernard Milleron.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This phase III study investigated whether continuation maintenance with gemcitabine or switch maintenance with erlotinib improves clinical outcome compared with observation in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose disease was controlled after cisplatin-gemcitabine induction chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred sixty-four patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC without tumor progression after four cycles of cisplatin-gemcitabine were randomly assigned to observation or to gemcitabine (1,250 mg/m(2) days 1 and 8 of a 3-week cycle) or daily erlotinib (150 mg/day) study arms. On disease progression, patients in all three arms received pemetrexed (500 mg/m(2) once every 21 days) as predefined second-line therapy. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS).
RESULTS: PFS was significantly prolonged by gemcitabine (median, 3.8 v 1.9 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.56; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.72; log-rank P < .001) and erlotinib (median, 2.9 v 1.9 months; HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.88; log-rank P = .003) versus observation; this benefit was consistent across all clinical subgroups. Both maintenance strategies resulted in a nonsignificant improvement in overall survival (OS); patients who received second-line pemetrexed or with a performance status of 0 appeared to derive greater benefit. Exploratory analysis showed that magnitude of response to induction chemotherapy may affect the OS benefit as a result of gemcitabine maintenance. Maintenance gemcitabine and erlotinib were well tolerated with no unexpected adverse events.
CONCLUSION: Gemcitabine continuation maintenance or erlotinib switch maintenance significantly reduces disease progression in patients with advanced NSCLC treated with cisplatin-gemcitabine as first-line chemotherapy. Response to induction chemotherapy may affect OS only for continuation maintenance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22949150     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.9782

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  89 in total

1.  Predictors and impact of second-line chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the United States: real-world considerations for maintenance therapy.

Authors:  David E Gerber; Drew W Rasco; Phat Le; Jingsheng Yan; Jonathan E Dowell; Yang Xie
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 15.609

Review 2.  Complex decisions for first-line and maintenance treatment of advanced wild-type non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Ryan D Gentzler; Melissa L Johnson
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-02-06

3.  A phase II randomized trial evaluating gefitinib intercalated with pemetrexed/platinum chemotherapy or pemetrexed/platinum chemotherapy alone in unselected patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Hui Yu; Jian Zhang; Xianghua Wu; Zhiguo Luo; Huijie Wang; Si Sun; Wei Peng; Jie Qiao; Yu Feng; Jialei Wang; Jianhua Chang
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 4.742

Review 4.  Squamous cell lung cancer: from tumor genomics to cancer therapeutics.

Authors:  David R Gandara; Peter S Hammerman; Martin L Sos; Primo N Lara; Fred R Hirsch
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 5.  Standard of care in immunotherapy trials: Challenges and considerations.

Authors:  Gareth Rivalland; Andrew M Scott; Thomas John
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  Clinical meta-analyses of targeted therapies in adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Emilio Bria; Maria Bonomi; Sara Pilotto; Francesco Massari; Silvia Novello; Matteo Giaj Levra; Giampaolo Tortora; Giorgio Scagliotti
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 4.493

Review 7.  Maintenance chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: new life for an old idea.

Authors:  David E Gerber; Joan H Schiller
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Maintenance treatment with gemcitabine have a promising activity on metastatic bladder cancer survival.

Authors:  Tülay Kuş; Gökmen Aktaş
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-07-31

9.  Switch maintenance therapy with docetaxel and bevacizumab after induction therapy with cisplatin, pemetrexed, and bevacizumab in advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II study.

Authors:  Koji Nishimoto; Masato Karayama; Naoki Inui; Hideki Yasui; Hironao Hozumi; Yuzo Suzuki; Kazuki Furuhashi; Tomoyuki Fujisawa; Noriyuki Enomoto; Yutaro Nakamura; Nao Inami; Shun Matsuura; Yusuke Kaida; Takashi Matsui; Kazuhiro Asada; Hiroyuki Matsuda; Masato Fujii; Mikio Toyoshima; Shiro Imokawa; Takafumi Suda
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2018-06-16       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 10.  The efficacy and safety of EGFR inhibitor monotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  XiongWen Yang; Ke Yang; KangYu Kuang
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 5.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.