Literature DB >> 25163826

[Radical prostatectomy in a certified prostate cancer center: medical treatment and outcome].

J Kranz1, O Deserno, K Fischer, P Anheuser, B Reisch, J Steffens.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Open radical prostatectomy (RPE) is a standardized surgical technique with good oncologic/functional results. Nevertheless, the postoperative quality of life can be affected significantly by urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction. Consequently, data of postoperative health-related quality of life come increasingly into public interest.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This paper aims to evaluate the quality of care after radical RPE at a certified prostate cancer center. The oncological outcome, rate of complications, reintervention and transfusions as well as the rate of continence and potency of a total collective of nearly 400 patients was obtained in a standardized manner between January 2008 and June 2012 using the clinic's internal tumor documentation system and commonly used, validated questionnaires. Due to consistent methodology, partial results can finally be compared with data prior to establishment of the prostate cancer center.
RESULTS: This study is the first German report demonstrating an improvement of treatment results in a certified prostate cancer center. The rate of complications, reintervention, transfusions, and R1 status were significantly lower than in the precenter era. The evaluation of potency is sobering compared to current published literature, whereas satisfactory results were obtained for continency. DISCUSSION: Evaluation of the data contributes to the quality of treatment and outcome of certified prostate cancer centers and allows reliable decision-making and honest patient education in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25163826     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-014-3604-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  31 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic and robotic assisted radical prostatectomy--critical analysis of the results.

Authors:  Jens Rassweiler; Marcel Hruza; Dogu Teber; Li-Ming Su
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Factors associated with initial therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer: prostate cancer outcomes study.

Authors:  L C Harlan; A Potosky; F D Gilliland; R Hoffman; P C Albertsen; A S Hamilton; J W Eley; J L Stanford; R A Stephenson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-12-19       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Does a nerve-sparing technique or potency affect continence after open radical retropubic prostatectomy?

Authors:  Tracy P Marien; Herbert Lepor
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 4.  A systematic review of the volume-outcome relationship for radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Quoc-Dien Trinh; Anders Bjartell; Stephen J Freedland; Brent K Hollenbeck; Jim C Hu; Shahrokh F Shariat; Maxine Sun; Andrew J Vickers
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Recovery of urinary function after radical prostatectomy: identification of trajectory cluster groups.

Authors:  Christopher B Anderson; Melissa R Kaufman; Mary S Dietrich; Daniel A Barocas; Sam S Chang; Michael S Cookson; Joseph A Smith; Peter E Clark; S Duke Herrell
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Health-related quality of life for men with prostate cancer--an evaluation of outcomes 12-24 months after treatment.

Authors:  Stephen A Brassell; Sally I Elsamanoudi; Jennifer Cullen; Molly E Williams; David G McLeod
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 3.498

7.  Pentafecta: a new concept for reporting outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Vipul R Patel; Ananthakrishnan Sivaraman; Rafael F Coelho; Sanket Chauhan; Kenneth J Palmer; Marcelo A Orvieto; Ignacio Camacho; Geoff Coughlin; Bernardo Rocco
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Potency, continence and complication rates in 1,870 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies.

Authors:  W J Catalona; G F Carvalhal; D E Mager; D S Smith
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Urinary outcomes are significantly affected by nerve sparing quality during radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Deborah R Kaye; M Eric Hyndman; Robert L Segal; Lynda Z Mettee; Bruce J Trock; Zhaoyong Feng; Li-Ming Su; Trinity J Bivalacqua; Christian P Pavlovich
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Surgeon variation in patient quality of life after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Arthur Hartz; Tao He; Seth Strope; D Richard Cutler; Gerald Andriole; Christopher Dechet
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  2 in total

1.  [Improved prostate cancer treatment in certified centers : Is the strategic vision realistic?].

Authors:  J Steffens; J Kranz; P Albers
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  [Urethral stricture rate after prostate cancer radiotherapy : Five-year data of a certified prostate cancer center].

Authors:  J Kranz; G Maurer; U Maurer; O Deserno; S Schulte; J Steffens
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 0.639

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.