Literature DB >> 23123548

Surgeon variation in patient quality of life after radical prostatectomy.

Arthur Hartz1, Tao He, Seth Strope, D Richard Cutler, Gerald Andriole, Christopher Dechet.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We assessed variation among surgeons in patient quality of life outcomes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey of standard questions used to examine current urinary and sexual function was mailed to 1,500 randomly selected patients from the Utah Cancer Registry who met certain criteria, including prostatectomy for cancer cure more than 1 year previously, current age 70 years or less and no metastatic disease or other cancer therapy. Questionnaire information was linked to cancer registry and hospital discharge abstract information. Hierarchical mixed models were used to examine whether surgeons varied with respect to risk adjusted outcomes.
RESULTS: The cooperation rate was 64%. Of the 678 qualifying responders 22% reported leaking urine more than once per day, 7% used more than 1 pad per day and 40% reported no erection without medication. Surgeon variation was significant for 3 patient outcomes, including erectile strength, urine leakage and length of hospital stay (each p <0.001). Surgeon risk adjusted erectile outcomes significantly correlated with leakage outcomes (r = 0.84, p <0.0001) and length of stay (r = -0.55, p = 0.0004). Annual surgeon volume significantly correlated with less leakage and shorter length of stay (r = 0.34 and -0.36, respectively, each p = 0.05). Compared to open retropubic surgery, robotic surgery was associated with a shorter stay. The perineal approach was associated with shorter stay, less urine leakage and weaker erection.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient quality of life outcomes after prostatectomy varies substantially among surgeons. Administering patient surveys through cancer registries may provide valuable data for improving prostatectomy outcomes statewide.
Copyright © 2013 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23123548     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.10.118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  4 in total

Review 1.  [Radical prostatectomy in a certified prostate cancer center: medical treatment and outcome].

Authors:  J Kranz; O Deserno; K Fischer; P Anheuser; B Reisch; J Steffens
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Flexibility in Men's Sexual Practices in Response to Iatrogenic Erectile Dysfunction after Prostate Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Gary W Dowsett; Anthony Lyons; Duane Duncan; Richard J Wassersug
Journal:  Sex Med       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.491

Review 3.  The past, present, and future of urological quality improvement collaboratives.

Authors:  Adam C Reese; Serge Ginzburg
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-05

4.  Determinants of self-reported functional status (EPIC-26) in prostate cancer patients prior to treatment.

Authors:  Rebecca Roth; Sebastian Dieng; Alisa Oesterle; Günter Feick; Günther Carl; Andreas Hinkel; Thomas Steiner; Björn Theodor Kaftan; Frank Kunath; Boris Hadaschik; Simba-Joshua Oostdam; Rein Jüri Palisaar; Mateusz Koralewski; Burkhard Beyer; Björn Haben; Igor Tsaur; Simone Wesselmann; Christoph Kowalski
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 4.226

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.